Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: A qualitative and systematic review of the literature

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Reininga, Inge H F ^a   Zijlstra, Wiebren ^a   Wagenmakers, Robert ^a   Boerboom, Alexander L ^a   Huijbers, Bregtje P ^a   Groothoff, Johan W ^a   Bulstra, Sjoerd K ^a   Stevens, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; EMBASE; GAIT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; SAFETY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; STATISTICS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LENGTH OF STAY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77952214707     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-92     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up. JJ Callaghan JC Albright DD Goetz JP Olejniczak RC Johnston, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000 82 487 497 10761939
2. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. LI Havelin LB Engesaeter B Espehaug O Furnes SA Lie SE Vollset, Acta Orthop Scand 2000 71 337 353 10.1080/000164700317393321 11028881
3. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. ID Learmonth C Young C Rorabeck, Lancet 2007 370 1508 1519 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 17964352
4. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. GF Chimento V Pavone N Sharrock B Kahn J Cahill TP Sculco, J Arthroplasty 2005 20 139 144 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.061 15902851
5. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. JR Howell BA Masri CP Duncan, Orthop Clin North Am 2004 35 153 162 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00137-8 15062701
6. Skeptical perspectives on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Callaghan, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 85 A 2242 2243
7. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. MW Pagnano J Leone DG Lewallen AD Hanssen, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005 441 86 90 10.1097/01.blo.0000191275.80527.d6 16330989
8. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. ST Woolson CS Mow JF Syquia JV Lannin DJ Schurman, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86-A 1353 1358 15252080
9. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. JG Kennedy WB Rogers KE Soffe RJ Sullivan DG Griffen LJ Sheehan, J Arthroplasty 1998 13 530 534 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90052-3 9726318
10. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. GE Lewinnek JL Lewis R Tarr CL Compere JR Zimmerman, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978 60 217 220 641088
11. Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty. TC Kelley ML Swank, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009 91 Suppl 1 153 158 10.2106/JBJS.H.01463 19182044
12. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS? JM Sikorski S Chauhan, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003 85 319 323 10.1302/0301-620X.85B3.14212 12729101
13. Navigation in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty. M Hafez M Seel B Jaramaz A DiGioia III, Oper Tech Orthop 2006 16 207 210 10.1053/j.oto.2006.06.004 (Pubitemid 44283646)
14. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. AM DiGioia B Jaramaz M Blackwell DA Simon F Morgan JE Moody C Nikou BD Colgan CA Aston RS Labarca, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 8 22
15. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? T Kalteis M Handel H Bathis L Perlick M Tingart J Grifka, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006 88 163 167 10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17163 16434517
16. Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. T Leenders D Vandevelde G Mahieu R Nuyts, Comput Aided Surg 2002 7 99 106 10.3109/10929080209146021 12112719
17. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. AM DiGioia III AY Plakseychuk TJ Levison B Jaramaz, J Arthroplasty 2003 18 123 128 10.1054/arth.2003.50025 12629599
18. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. RL Wixson MA MacDonald, J Arthroplasty 2005 20 51 56 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.024 16214003
19. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. N Bellamy J Kirwan M Boers P Brooks V Strand P Tugwell R Altman K Brandt M Dougados M Lequesne, J Rheumatol 1997 24 799 802 9101522
20. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. M van Tulder A Furlan C Bombardier L Bouter, Spine 2003 28 1290 1299 10.1097/00007632-200306150-00014 12811274
21. J Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988
22. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. D Bennett L Ogonda D Elliott L Humphreys DE Beverland, Gait & Posture 2006 23 374 382
23. Mini-incision total hip replacement-surgical technique and early results. WK Chung D Liu LS Foo, J Orthop Surg 2004 12 19 24
24. Total hip arthroplasty: is small incision better? M Ciminiello J Parvizi PF Sharkey A Eslampour RH Rothman, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 484 488 10.1016/j.arth.2005.09.003 16781398 (Pubitemid 43866407)
25. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J de Beer D Petruccelli P Zalzal MJ Winemaker, J Arthroplasty 2004 19 945 950 15586328
26. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, blinded study. LD Dorr AV Maheshwari WT Long Z Wan LE Sirianni, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 1153 1160 10.2106/JBJS.F.00940 17545416
27. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive lateral approach-our experience and early results. J Dutka P Sosin M Libura P Skowronek, Ortop Traumatol Rehab 2007 9 39 45
28. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. R Hart V Stipcak M Janecek P Visna, Acta Orthop Belg 2005 71 60 64 15792209
29. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty: description of a new technique. RJ Khan D Fick P Khoo F Yao B Nivbrant D Wood, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 1038 1046 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.010 17027549
30. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study. YH Kim, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 1092 1098 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.015 17162166
31. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. M Lawlor P Humphreys E Morrow L Ogonda D Bennett D Elliott D Beverland, Clin Rehabil 2005 19 465 474 10.1191/0269215505cr890oa 16119401
32. Retrospective Comparison of Two-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Standard Direct Lateral Approach: A Single Surgeon's Experience. MJ Levine K West J Michelson P Manner, Semin Arthroplasty 2007 18 268 271
33. Gustatory sweating due to autonomic neuropathy in a patient with amyloidosis secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. T Nakamura K Tomoda M Tsukano Y Yamamura S Baba, Mod Rheumatol 2004 14 498 501 10.1007/s10165-004-0349-7 (Pubitemid 40028678)
34. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. L Ogonda R Wilson P Archbold M Lawlor P Humphreys S O'Brien D Beverland, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 87 701 710 10.2106/JBJS.D.02645 15805196
35. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach. M Rittmeister A Peters, Orthopade 2006 35 716 722 10.1007/s00132-006-0963-5 16688429
36. A lateral minimal-incision technique in total hip replacement: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. A Speranza R Iorio M Ferretti C D'Arrigo A Ferretti, HIP Int 2007 17 4 8 19197836
37. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled prospective trial. F Mazoochian P Weber S Schramm S Utzschneider A Fottner V Jansson, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009 19424709
38. Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system. T Kalteis M Handel T Herold L Perlick H Baethis J Grifka, Int Orthop 2005 29 272 276 10.1007/s00264-005-0671-5 16082540
39. Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods. BC Najarian JE Kilgore DC Markel, J Arthroplasty 2009 24 15 21 10.1016/j.arth.2008. 01.004 18534411
40. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. S Parratte JN Argenson, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 494 499 10.2106/JBJS.F.00529 17332097
41. Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. N Sugano T Nishii H Miki H Yoshikawa Y Sato S Tamura, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007 89 455 460 10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18458 17463111
42. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. HL Hoeksma CH Van Den Ende HK Ronday A Heering FC Breedveld, Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62 935 938 10.1136/ard.62.10.935 12972470
43. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. JM Quintana A Escobar A Bilbao I Arostegui I Lafuente I Vidaurreta, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005 13 1076 1083 10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012 16154777
44. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. MS Madsen MA Ritter HH Morris JB Meding ME Berend PM Faris VG Vardaxis, J Orthop Res 2004 22 44 50 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00151-7 14656658
45. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. MA Ritter LD Harty ME Keating PM Faris JB Meding, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 95 99 10.1097/00003086-200104000-00016 11302333
46. Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: the posterior and direct lateral approaches. GM Whatling HV Dabke CA Holt L Jones J Madete PM Alderman P Roberts, Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2008 222 897 905 10.1243/09544119JEIM396 18935806
47. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. AP Wines D McNicol, J Arthroplasty 2006 21 696 701 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.008 16877155
48. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. MJ Archibeck RE White Jr, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 232 238 10.1097/01.blo.0000150272.75831. 2f 15577493
49. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles. I Shrier JF Boivin RJ Steele RW Platt A Furlan R Kakuma J Brophy M Rossignol, Am J Epidemiol 2007 166 1203 1209 10.1093/aje/kwm189 17712019
50. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? RW Poolman PA Struijs R Krips IN Sierevelt KH Lutz M Bhandari, BMC Med Res Methodol 2006 6 44 10.1186/1471-2288-6-44 16965628