Erratum (DOI:10.1053/j.oto.2006.06.004);Navigation in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroscopy

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 207-210

  Hafez, Mahmoud A ^a   Seel, Michael J ^a   Jaramaz, Branislav ^a   DiGioia III, Anthony M ^b  

^a WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

arthroplasty; computer assisted; hip; knee; MIS; navigation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTHROSCOPY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EXPERIENCE; FLUOROSCOPY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON; SURGICAL ERROR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 33747846548     PISSN: 10486666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.oto.2006.10.002     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Paul H.A., Bargar W.L., Mettelstadt B.D., et al. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 285 (1992) 57-66
2. DiGioia A., and Jaramaz B. Closing the loop in surgical practice. Lancet 354 (1999) siv46
3. Nogler M., Kessler O., Prassl A., et al. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Rel Res 426 (2004) 159-163
4. Amiot L.-P., and Poulin F. Computed tomography-based navigation for hip, knee, and spine surgery. Clin Orthop Rel Res 421 (2004) 77-86
5. DiGioia III A.M., Jaramaz B., Plakseychuk A.Y., et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 359-364
6. Jaramaz B., DiGioia III A.M., Blackwell M., et al. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res 354 (1998) 70-81
7. Jolles B.M., Genoud III P., and Hoffmeyer P. Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Rel Res 426 (2004) 174-179
8. Saxler G., Marx A., Vandevelde D., et al. The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning-a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop (SICOT) 28 (2004) 198-201
9. Laskin R.S. Instrumentation pitfalls: you just can't go on autopilot!. J Arthroplasty 181 suppl (2003) 18-22
10. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg 86B (2004) 372-377
11. Delp S.L., Stulberg S.D., Davies B., et al. Computer-assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res 354 (1998) 49-56
12. Jenny J.-Y., Clemens U., Kohler S., et al. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system-a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 832-839
13. Perlick L., Bathis H., Tingart M., et al. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthrop Scand 75 (2004) 464-470
14. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 830-835
15. Stulberg S.D. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?. Clin Orthop Rel Res 416 (2003) 177-184
16. DiGioia III A.M., Blendea S., Jaramaz B., et al. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty using navigational tools. Instr Course Lect 53 (2004) 157-164
17. DiGioia III A.M., Blendea S., and Jaramaz B. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery; minimally invasive hip and knee reconstruction. Orthp Clin N Am 35 (2004) 183-189
18. Nogler M., Krismer M., Rachbauer F., et al. Minimally invasive hip surgery with imageless navigation. In: Stiehl J.B., Konermann W.H., and Haaker R.G. (Eds). Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery (2003), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 110-115
19. Perlick L., Bathis H., Tingart M., et al. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system. Int Orthop (SICOT) 28 (2004) 193-197
20. Stulberg S.D. The rationale for using computer navigation with minimally invasive THA. Orthopedics 27 (2004) 942-945
21. Wixson R.L., and MacDonald M.A. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J Arthroplasty 20 suppl (2005) 51-56
22. DiGioia III A.M., Jaramaz B., Blackwell M., et al. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment-The Otto Aufranc Award. Clin Orthop Rel Res 355 (1998) 8-22
23. Hube R., Birke A., Hein W., et al. CT-based and fluoroscopy-based navigation for cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Surg Technol Int 11 (2003) 275-280
24. Leenders T., Vandevelde D., Mahieu G., et al. Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg 7 (2002) 99-106
25. Grutzner P., Zheng G., Langlotz U., et al. C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience. Injury 35 suppl (2004) 90-95
26. Dorr L., Hishiki Y., Wan Z., et al. Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement. Iowa Orthop J 25 (2005) 1-9
27. Kiefer H. OrthoPilot cup navigation-how to optimise cup positioning?. Int Orthop 27 suppl (2003) S37-S42
28. Seel M.J., Hafez M.A., Eckman K., et al. 3-D planning and virtual X-ray in revision hip arthroplasty for instability. Clin Orthop Rel Res 442 (2006) 35-38
29. Krackow K.A., Serpe L., Phillips M.J., et al. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics 22 (1999) 698-702
30. Picard F., Leitner F., Raoult O., et al. Clinical Evaluation of Computer Aassisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (1998) Paper presented at Proceedings of the Second Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA
31. Saragaglia D., Picard F., Chaussard E., et al. Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of a 50 case prospective randomized study (2001) Paper presented at First Annual Meeting of Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery, Davos, Switzerland
32. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 618-626
33. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 282-288
34. Victor J., and Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 (2004) 131-139
35. Stockl B., Nogler M., Rosiek R., et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 (2004) 180-186
36. Nabeyama R., Matsuda S., Miura H., et al. The accuracy of image guided knee replacement based on computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg 86B (2003) 366-371
37. Perlick L., Bathis H., Tingart M., et al. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthrop Scand 75 (2004) 464-470
38. Bolognesi M., and Hoffman A. Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 (2005) 162-169
39. Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., and Markel D.C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 20 suppl 3 (2005) 132-138
40. Kim S.J., MacDonald M., Hernandez J., et al. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 20 suppl 3 (2005) 123-131
41. Haaker R.G., Stockheim M., Kamp M., et al. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433 (2005) 152-159
42. DiGioia III A.M., Plakseychuk A.Y., and Jaramaz B. Mini-incision techniques and navigation for total hip. In: Stiehl J.B., Konermann W.H., and Haaker R.G. (Eds). Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery (2003), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 62-69
43. Hafez M.A., Jaramaz B., and DiGioia III A.M. Computer assisted surgery of the knee: An overview. In: Insall J.N., and Scott N. (Eds). Surgery of the Knee. (ed 4) (2006), Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, PA 1655-1674
44. Li Q., Zamorano L., Jiang Z., et al. Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system-a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and FlashPoint Tracking Systems. Computer Aided Surg 4 (1999) 314-321
45. Sugano N., Sasama T., Sato Y., et al. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Computer Aided Surg 6 (2001) 195-203
46. Hafez M.A., Chelule K.L., and Seedhom B.B. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Rel Res 444 (2006) 184-192
47. Brisson G, Kanade T III AD, et al: Precision handheld sculpting of bone. Paper presented at: CAOS, 2003; Marbella, Spain
48. Wolf A., Jaramaz B., and DiGioia III A.M. MBARS: mini bone-attached robotic system for joint arthroplasty. Int J Medical Robotics Computer Assisted Surg 1 (2005) 101-121