Evaluation of Component Positioning in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Imageless Navigation Device Compared With Traditional Methods

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 15-21

  Najarian, Brian C ^a   Kilgore, John E ^b   Markel, David C ^c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Morton Plant Hospital   (United States)

^c PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

acetabular; component positioning; navigation; total hip arthroplasty; traditional methods

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 57649111549     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kennedy J.G., Rogers W.B., Soffe K.E., et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethelene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 530
2. Schmalzried T.P., Guttmann D., Grecula M., et al. The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 (1994) 677
3. Williamson J.A., and Reckling F.W. Limb length discrepancy and related problems following total hip joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 134 (1978) 135
4. Dobzyniak M., Fehring T.K., and Odum S. Early failure in total hip arthroplasty. CORR 447 (2006) 76
5. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 60 (1978) 217
6. DiGioia A.M., Jaramasz B., Blackwell M., et al. The Otto Aufranc award: image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. CORR 355 (1998) 8
7. DiGioia A.M., and Jaramaz B. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 359
8. DiGioia A.M., and Jaramasz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18 (2004) 123
9. Nogler M.A. Navigated minimal invasive total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int 12 (2004) 259
10. Noble P.C., and Sugano N. Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position?. CORR 417 (2003) 242
11. Murray D.W. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 (1993) 228
12. Nogler M.A. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. CORR 426 (2004) 159
13. Kiefer H. Orthopilot cup navigation-how to optimize cup positioning?. Int Orthop 27 (2003) S37
14. Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 (1999) 431
15. Widmer K.H. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 387
16. Kalteis T., Handel M., Herold T., et al. Position of the acetabular cup-accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 58 (2006) 294
17. Haaker R.G., Tiedjen K., Ottersbach A., et al. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 151
18. Parratte S., and Argenson J.N. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 (2007) 494
19. Widmner K.H., and Grutzner P.A. Joint replacement-total hip with CT-based navigation. Injury 35 (2004) S-A84