Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: The posterior and direct lateral approaches

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 222, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 897-905

  Whatling, G M ^a   Dabke, H V ^b   Holt, C A ^a   Jones, L ^a   Madete, J ^a   Alderman, P M ^b   Roberts, P ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL GWENT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Classification; Joint replacement; Motion analysis

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL DATUM; CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION TOOLS; COMMON PROBLEMS; CONTRIBUTING FACTORS; FUNCTIONAL ABILITIES; JOINT REPLACEMENT; MOTION ANALYSIS; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; BIOMECHANICAL DATA; CLASSIFICATION TOOL; CONTRIBUTING FACTOR; MOTION ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); JOINT PROSTHESES; MOTION ANALYSIS; ORTHOPEDICS; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

JOINT PROSTHESES; ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 58149164560     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM396     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. McFarland, B. and Osborne, G. Approach to the hip: a suggested improvement on Kocher's method. J. Bone Jt Surg. Br., 1954, 36, 364-367.
2. Baker, A. and Bitounis, V. Abductor function after total hip replacement: an electromyographic and clinical review. J. Bone Jt Surg. Br., 1989, 71, 47-50.
3. Kenny, P., O'Brien, C., Synnott, K., and Walsh, M. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after two different approaches to the hip. J. Bone Jt Surg. Br., 1999, 81(6), 979-981.
4. Jolles, B. and Bogoch, E. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev., 2004, (1), CD003828.
5. Zimmerman, S., Hawkes, W. G., Hudson, J. I., Magaziner, J., Hebel, J. R., Towheed, T., Gardner, J., Provenzano, G., and Kenzora, J. E. Outcomes of surgical management of total hip replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach. J. Orthop. Res., 2002, 20(2), 182-191.
6. Woo, R. and Morrey, B. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg. Am., 1982, 64(9), 1295-1306.
7. Ritter, M., Harty, L., Keating, M., Faris, P., and Meding, J. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin. Orthop. Related Res., 2001, 385, 95-99.
8. Masonis, J. and Bourne, R. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin. Orthop. Related Res., 2002, 405, 46-53.
9. Phillips, A., Howie, C., and Pankaj, P. Biomechanical evaluation of anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to hip joint arthroplasty. In Proceedings of the British Hip Society, J. Bone Jt Surg. Br.
10. Bergmann, G., Deuretzbacher, G., Heller, M., Graicher, F., Rohlmann, A., Strauss, J., and Duda, G. N. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomechanics, 2001, 34, 859-871.
11. Madsen, M. S., Ritter, M. A., Morris, H. H., Meding, J. B., Berend, M. E., Farrs, P. M., and Vardoxis, V. G. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J. Orthop. Res., 2004, 22, 44-50.
12. Gore, D., Murray, M., Sepic, S., and Gardner, G. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength and hip motion. Clin. Orthop. Related Res., 1982, 165, 180-187.
13. Downing, N., Clark, D., Hutchinson, J., Colclough, K., and Howard, P. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 2001, 72(3), 215-220.
14. Jones, L., Beynon, M., Holt, C., and Roy, S. An application of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence to the classification of knee function and detection of improvement due to total knee replacement surgery. J. Biomechanics, 2006, 39, 2512-2520.