Correlation of signal attenuation-based quantitative magnetic resonance imaging with quantitative computed tomographic measurements of subchondral bone mineral density in metacarpophalangeal joints of horses

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 412-420

  Olive, Julien ^a,b   D'Anjou, Marc André ^a   Alexander, Kate ^a   Beauchamp, Guy ^a   Theoret, Christine L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE PLATE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HORSE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY;

EQUIDAE;

EID: 77952208547     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.71.4.412     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Young BD, Samii VF, Mattoon JS, et al. Subchondral bone density and cartilage degeneration patterns in osteoarthritic metacarpal condyles of horses. Am J Vet Res 2007;68:841-849.
2. Blumenkrantz G, Lindsey CT, Dunn TC, et al. A pilot, two-year longitudinal study of the interrelationship between trabecular bone and articular cartilage in the osteoarthritic knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12:997-1005. (Pubitemid 39618455)
3. Lindsey CT, Narasimhan A, Adolfo JM, et al. Magnetic resonance evaluation of the interrelationship between articular cartilage and trabecular bone of the osteoarthritic knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12:86-96. (Pubitemid 38181116)
4. Barr ED, Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, et al. Post mortem evaluation of palmar osteochondral disease (traumatic osteochondrosis) of the metacarpo/ metatarsophalangeal joint in Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2009;41:366-371.
5. Riggs CM, Whitehouse GH, Boyde A. Pathology of the distal condyles of the third metacarpal and third metatarsal bones of the horse. Equine Vet J 1999;31:140-148. (Pubitemid 129571979)
6. Norrdin RW, Kawcak CE, Capwell BA, et al. Subchondral bone failure in an equine model of overload arthrosis. Bone 1998;22:133-139.
7. Karsdal MA, Leeming DJ, Dam EB, et al. Should subchondral bone turnover be targeted when treating osteoarthritis? Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16.638-646.
8. Rubio-Martínez LM, Cruz AM, Gordon K, et al. Structural characterization of subchondral bone in the distal aspect of third metacarpal bones from Thoroughbred racehorses via microcomputed tomography. Am J Vet Res 2008;69:1413-1422.
9. Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, et al. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 2008;11:123-162.
10. Lewis CW, Williamson AK, Chen AC, et al. Evaluation of subchondral bone mineral density associated with articular cartilage structure and integrity in healthy equine joints with different functional demands. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1823-1829.
11. Guglielmi G, Grimston SK, Fischer KC, et al. Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology 1994;192:845-850. (Pubitemid 24266808)
12. Adams J, Alsop C, Harrison E, et al. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT): the forgotten gold standard? J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:169.
13. Drum MG, Les CM, Park RD, et al. Correlation of quantitative computed tomographic subchondral bone density and ash density in horses. Bone 2009;44:316-319.
14. Phan CM, Matsuura M, Bauer JS, et al. Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: comparison of MR imaging at 3.0 and 1.5 T with micro-CT as the standard of reference. Radiology 2006;239:488-496.
15. Brismar TB. MR relaxometry of lumbar spine, hip, and calcaneus in healthy premenopausal women: relationship with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1215-1221.
16. Chung H, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, et al. Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:10250-10254. (Pubitemid 23328290)
17. Fernandez-Seara MA, Song HK, Wehrli FW. Trabecular bone volume fraction mapping by low-resolution MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:103-113.
18. Hatipoglu HG, Selvi A, Ciliz D, et al. Quantitative and diffusion MR imaging as a new method to assess osteoporosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1934-1937. (Pubitemid 350174738)
19. Hong J, Hipp JA, Mulkern RV, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of bone density and cross-sectional geometry. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;66:74-78.
20. Kröger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J. Estimation of spinal bone density using conventional MRI. Comparison between MRI and DXA in 32 subjects. Acta Orthop Scand 1995;66:532-534.
21. Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt AJ, et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:653-661.
22. Link TM, Majumdar S, Augat P, et al. In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:1175-1182.
23. Machann J, Raible A, Schnatterbeck P, et al. Osteodensitometry of human heel bones by MR spin-echo imaging: comparison with MR gradient-echo imaging and quantitative computed tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:147-155. (Pubitemid 32709474)
24. Majumdar S, Genant HK. A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:79-92.
25. Wehrli FW, Hwang SN, Ma J, et al. Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology 1998;206:347-357. (Pubitemid 28112947)
26. Yablonskiy DA, Reinus WR, Stark H, et al. Quantitation of T2' anisotropic effects on magnetic resonance bone mineral density measurement. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:214-221. (Pubitemid 27045393)
27. Wehrli FW. Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:390-409. (Pubitemid 46204587)
28. Wehrli FW, Song HK, Saha PK, et al. Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function. NMR Biomed 2006;19:731-764. (Pubitemid 44811541)
29. Majumdar S, Thomasson D, Shimakawa A, et al. Quantitation of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: experimental studies. Magn Reson Med 1991;22:111-127.
30. Beuf O, Ghosh S, Newitt DC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of normal and osteoarthritic trabecular bone structure in the human knee. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:385-393. (Pubitemid 34136576)
31. Bolbos RI, Zuo J, Banerjee S, et al. Relationship between trabecular bone structure and articular cartilage morphology and relaxation times in early OA of the knee joint using parallel MRI at 3T. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:1150-1159.
32. Lammentausta E, Hakulinen MA, Jurvelin JS, et al. Prediction of mechanical properties of trabecular bone using quantitative MRI. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:6187-6198. (Pubitemid 46217658)
33. van Harreveld PD, Lillich JD, Kawcak CE, et al. Effects of immobilization followed by remobilization on mineral density, histomorphometric features, and formation of the bones of the metacarpophalangeal joint in horses. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:276-281.
34. Walker JE, Lewis CW, MacLeay JM, et al. Assessment of subchondral bone mineral density in equine metacarpophalangeal and stifle joints. Biomed Sci Instrum 2004;40:272-276.
35. Comelissen BP, van Weeren PR, Ederveen AG, et al. Influence of exercise on bone mineral density of immature cortical and trabecular bone of the equine metacarpus and proximal sesamoid bone. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999;(31):79-85.
36. Drum MG, Kawcak CE, Norrdin RW, et al. Comparison of gross and histopathologic findings with quantitative computed tomographic bone density in the distal third metacarpal bone of race-horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:518-527.
37. Kawcak CE, Mcllwraith CW, Norrdin RW, et al. Clinical effects of exercise on subchondral bone of carpal and metacarpophalangeal joints in horses. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:1252-1258.
38. Spriet MP, Girard CA, Foster SF, et al. Validation of a 40 MHz B-scan ultrasound biomicroscope for the evaluation of osteoarthritis lesions in an animal model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13:171-179.
39. Noyes FR, Stabler CL. A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:505-513.
40. McGibbon CA, Trahan CA. Measurement accuracy of focal cartilage defects from MRI and correlation of MRI graded lesions with histology: a preliminary study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003;11:483-493.
41. CT Calibration Phantom user's guide. San Francisco: Mindways Software, 2002.
42. Bouchgua M, Alexander K, Carmel EN, et al. Use of routine clinical multimodality imaging in a rabbit model of osteoarthritis - part II: bone mineral density assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:197-204.
43. Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld JP, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006;14(suppl A):A46-A75. (Pubitemid 43899398)
44. Peterfy CG, Gold G, Eckstein F, et al. MRI protocols for whole-organ assessment of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006;14(suppl A):A95-A111. (Pubitemid 43899403)
45. Wehrli FW, Hilaire L, Fernandez-Seara M, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the calcaneus and femur of women with varying degrees of osteopenia and vertebral deformity status. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:2265-2273. (Pubitemid 35416761)
46. Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC. Computed tomography. In: Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC. Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1990;19:289-322.
47. Riggs CM, Whitehouse GH, Boyde A. Structural variation of the distal condyles of the third metacarpal and third metatarsal bones in the horse. Equine Vet J 1999;31:130-139. (Pubitemid 129571978)
48. Martig S, Boisclair J, Konar M, et al. MRI characteristics and histology of bone marrow lesions in dogs with experimentally induced osteoarthritis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:105-112. (Pubitemid 46376363)
49. Murray RC, Blunden TS, Schramme MC, et al. How does magnetic resonance imaging represent histologic findings in the equine digit? Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006;47:17-31.
50. Zanetti M, Bruder E, Romero J, et al. Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology 2000;215:835-840. (Pubitemid 30346026)
51. d'Anjou MA, Troncy E, Moreau M, et al. Temporal assessment of bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in a canine model of knee osteoarthritis: impact of sequence selection. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:1307-1311.
52. Olive J, d'Anjou MA, Alexander K, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and radiography for assessment of noncartilaginous changes in equine metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis [published online ahead of print Jan 29, 2010]. Vet Radiol Ultrasound doi:10.1111/j.1740- 8261.2009.01653.x.
53. Machann J, Schnatterbeck P, Raible A, et al. Magnetic resonance osteodensitometry in human heel bones: correlation with quantitative computed tomography using different measuring parameters. Invest Radiol 2000;35:393-400. (Pubitemid 30448166)
54. Becker C, Baltzer AW, Schneppenheim M, et al. Experimental validation of DXA and MRI-based bone density measurement by ash-method [in German]. Zentralbl Chir 2001;126:402-406 (Pubitemid 32441000)
55. Hopkins JA, Wehrli FW. Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:494-500.
56. Cann CE. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 1988;166:509-522. (Pubitemid 18030768)
57. Nazarian A, Snyder BD, Zurakowski D, et al. Quantitative micro-computed tomography: a non-invasive method to assess equivalent bone mineral density. Bone 2008;43:302-311.
58. Samii VF, Les Clifford M, Schulz KS, et al. Computed tomographic osteoabsorptiometry of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:1159-1166.
59. Sanada S, Kawahara K, Yamamoto T, et al. New tissue substitutes representing cortical bone and adipose tissue in quantitative radiology. Phys Med Biol 1999;44:N107-N112. (Pubitemid 129505090)
60. Faulkner KG, Gluer CC, Grampp S, et al. Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data. Osteoporos Int 1993;3:36-42. (Pubitemid 23041208)
61. Boyde A, Firth EC. Musculoskeletal responses of 2-year-old Thoroughbred horses to early training. 8. Quantitative back-scattered electron scanning electron microscopy and confocal fluorescence microscopy of the epiphysis of the third metacarpal bone. N Z Vet J 2005;53:123-132.