Computed tomographic osteoabsorptiometry of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1159-1166

  Samii, Valeria F ^a   Les, Clifford M ^a   Schulz, Kurt S ^a   Keyak, Joyce H ^a   Stover, Susan M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIPOTASSIUM HYDROGEN PHOSPHATE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRUCTURE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; ELBOW; FORELIMB; IMAGE DISPLAY; JOINT SCINTISCANNING; NONHUMAN;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 0036702239     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1159     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Grondalen J, Lingaas F. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs: a genetic investigation. J Small Anim Pract 1991;32:460-464.
2. Studdert VP, Lavelle B, Beilharz RG, et al. Clinical features and heritability of osteochondrosis of the elbow in Labrador retrievers. J Small Anim Pract 1991;32:557-563.
3. Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: part I. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986;22:711-724.
4. Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow diseases in the dog: part II. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986;22:725-730.
5. Olsson SE. General and etiologic factors in canine osteochondrosis. Vet Q 1987;9:268-278.
6. Paatsama S, Rokkanen P, Jussila J. Etiologic factors in osteochondritis dissecans. Acta Ortho Scandinavica 1975;46:906-918.
7. Olsson SE. Osteochondrosis-a growing problem to dog breeders. Gaines Progress 1976; Summer: 1-11.
8. Olsson SE. Pathophysiology, morphology and clinical signs of osteochondrosis in the dog. In: Bojrab MJ, ed. Pathophysiology in small animal surgery. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1981;604-617
9. Olsson SE. The early diagnosis of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the canine elbow joint. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983;19:616-626.
10. Mason TA, Lavelle RB, Skipper SC, et al, Osteochondrosis of the elbow joint in young dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1980;21:641-656.
11. Guthrie S. Use of a radiographic scoring technique for the assessment of dogs with elbow osteochondrosis. J Small Anim Pract 1989;30:639-644.
12. Berry CR. Evaluation of the canine elbow for fragmented medial coronoid process. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1992;33-273-276.
13. Guthrie S, Buckland-Wright JC, Vaughan LC. Microfocal radiography as an aid to the diagnosis of canine elbow osteochondrosis. J Small Anim Pract 1991;32:503-508.
14. Lowry JE, Carpenter LG, Park RD, et al. Radiographic anatomy and technique for arthrography of the cubital joint in clinically normal dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:72-77.
15. Lewis DD, Parker RB, Hager DA. Fragmented medial coronoid process of the canine elbow. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1989;11:703-715.
16. Fox SM, Roberts RE. Linear tomography in diagnosing fragmented coronoid processes in canine elbows. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1987;9:60-65.
17. Carpenter LG, Schwarz PD, Lowry JE, et al. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented medial coronoid process of the cubital joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:78-83.
18. Hornof WJ, Wind AP, Wallack ST, et al. Canine elbow dysplasia. The early radiographic detection of fragmentation of the coronoid process. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000;30:257-266.
19. Korbel J, Matis U, Maierl J, et al. CT-osteoabsorptiometry in dogs with elbow disease, in Proceedings. 10th Congr Eur Soc Vet Orthop Traumatol 2000;91-92.
20. Muller-Gerbl M. The subchondral bone plate. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 1998;141:1-134.
21. Radin EL. Subchondral bone changes and cartilage damage. Equine Vet J 1999;31:94-95.
22. Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp N, et al. Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical adaptation in individual joints. Skeletal Radiol 1989;18:507-512.
23. Cann CE. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 1988;166:509-522.
24. Chen X, Lam YM. Technical note: CT determination of the mineral density of dry bone specimens using the dipotassium phosphate phantom. Am J Phys Anthropol 1997;103:557-560.
25. Eckstein F, Lohe F, Muller-Gerbl M, et al. Stress distribution in the trochlear notch. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:647-653.
26. Eckstein F, Merz B, Muller-Gerbl M, et al. Morphomechanics of the humero-ulnar joint: II. Concave incongruity determines the distribution of load and subchondral, mineralization. Anat Rec 1995;243:327-335.
27. Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Kenn R. Demonstration of subchondral bone density patterns by three-dimensional CT osteoabsorptiometry as a noninvasive method for in vivo assessment of individual long-term stresses in joints. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7: S411-S418.
28. Les CM, Keyak JH, Stover SM, et al. Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography. J Orthop Res 1994;12:822-833.