Web-site as an educational tool in biology education: A case of nutrition issue

Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 907-921

  Fančovičová, Jana ^a   Prokop, Pavol ^a   Uşak, Muhammet ^b  

^a TRNAVA UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

^b ZIRVE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ICT; Nutrition education; Website

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952154946     PISSN: 13030485     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bahar, M., Aydin, F., & Karakirik, E. (2009). A diagnostic study of computer application of structural communication grid. Th e Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 8(2), 5-19. Retrieved 12 February 2010, from http://www.tojet.net/articles/821.pdf
2. Baser, M. & Durmus, S (2010). Th e eff ectiveness of computer supported versus real laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 47-61.
3. Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A Review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.
4. Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., Stevens, V., Vandelanotte, C., & Brug, J. (2007). Evaluation of an interactive computer-tailored nutrition intervention in a real-life setting. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 39-48.
5. Brosman, M. J. (1998). Th e role of psychological gender in the computer-related attitudes and attainments of primary school children (aged 6-11). Computers education, 30(3-4), 203-208.
6. Brug, J., Campbell, M. K., & Van Assema, P. (1999). Th e application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 145-156.
7. Brug, J., Oenema, A., Kroeze, W., & Raat, H. (2005). Th e internet and nutrition education: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59(Suppl 1), 130-139.
8. Camnalbur, M., Erdogan, Y. (2008). A meta analysis on the eff ectiveness of computer-assisted instruction: Turkey sample. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri (KUYEB), 8(2), 497-505.
9. Cepni, S. (2009). Eff ects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing students misconceptions about concepts: "Light, light source and seeing". Energy Education Science And Technology: Part B-Social and Educational Studies, 1, 51-83.
10. Çepni, S., Tas, E., & Köse, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students' cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers & Education,46(2), 192-205.
11. De Vries, H., & Brug, J. (1999). Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adpt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Education and Counseling, 36, 99-105.
12. Erdogan, Y. (2009). Paper-based and computer-based concept mappings: Th e eff ects on computer achievement, computer anxiety and computer attitude. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 821-836.
13. Fancov̌ičová, J. & Prokop, P. (2008). Students' attitudes toward computer use in Slovakia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 255-262.
14. Graff , M. (2003). Cognitive style and attitudes towards using online learning and assessment methods. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 1, 21-28.
15. Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Maija, A., & Meisalo, V. (2009). Adoption of ICT in science education: A case study of communication channels in a teachers' professional development Project. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(2), 103-118.
16. Kiboss, J. K., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. W. (2004). Eff ectiveness of a computermediated simulations program in school biology on pupils' learning outcomes in cell theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 207-213.
17. Kreisel, K. (2004). Evaluation of a computer-based nutrition education tool. Public Health Nutrition, 7(2), 271-277.
18. Kroeze, W., Werkman, A., & Brug, J. (2006). A systematic review of randomized trials on the eff ectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(3), 205-223.
19. Kubiatko, M. & Haláková, Z. (2009). Slovak high school students' attitudes to ICT using in biology lesson. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 743-748.
20. Markauskaite, L. (2006). Gender issues in pre-service teachers' training: ICT literacy and on-line learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 1-20.
21. Millett, K. & Lock, R. (1992). GCSE student's attitudes towards animal use: Some implications for biology/science teacher. Journal of Biological Education, 26, 204-206.
22. Ng, W. & Gunstone, R. (2002). Students' perceptions of the eff ectiveness of theworldwide web as a research and teaching tool in science learning. Research in Science Education, 32, 489-510.
23. Oenema, A., Brug, J., & Tan, F. (2005). Short term impact of a web-based tailored nutrition intervention, main eff ects and mediators. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 54-63.
24. Ogilvie, R. W., Trusk, T. C., & Blue, A. V. (1999). Students'attitudes towards computer testing in a basic science course. Medical education, 33, 828-831.
25. Palaigeorgiou, G. E., Siozos P. D., Konstantakis N. I., & Tsoukalas I. A. (2005). A computer attitude scale for computer science freshmen and its educational implications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 330-342.
26. Paris, P. G. (2004). E-learning: A study on secondary students' attitudes towards online web assisted learning. International Education Journal, 5, 98-112.
27. Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliff e, S. D. (2007). Is biology boring? Students' attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 36-39.
28. Romi, S., Hansenson, G., Hansenson, A., & Gan, R. (2002). E-learning: A comparison between expected and observed attitudes of normative and dropout adolescents. Education Media International, 39(1), 47-54.
29. Rosen, L. D. & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer availability, computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behaviour, 11(1), 9-31.
30. Sharpe, M. E. (2004). Chapter 2. adolescents' attitudestoward the computer. Russian Education and Society, 46(6), 39-55.
31. Sorgo, A. & Kocijancic, S. (2006). Demonstration of biological processes in lakes and fishponds through computerised laboratory practice. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(6), 1224-1230.
32. Sorgo, A., Hajdinjak, Z., & Briski, D. (2008). Th e journey of a sandwich: Computerbased laboratory experiments about the human digestive system in high school biology teaching. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(1), 92-99.
33. Sorgo, A., Verčkovnik, T. & Kocijancic, S. (2010). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in biology teaching in Slovenian secondary schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 39-46.
34. Spernjak, A. & Sorgo, A. (2009). Comparison of attitudinal diff erences with three diff erent styles of biological laboratory exercises among elementary school students.Didactica Slovenica-Pedagoska Obzorja, 24(3-4), 68-86.
35. Spicer, J. I. & Stratford, J. (2001). Student perceptions of avirtual field trip to replace a real field trip. Journal of ComputerAssisted Learning, 17, 345-354.