A diagnostic study of computer application of structural communication grid

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 5-19

  Bahar, Mehmet ^a   Aydin, Fatih ^b   Karakirik, Erol ^a  

^a ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Measurement and evaluation; Software evaluation questionnaire; Structured communication grid

Indexed keywords

EID: 71749108329     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akpinar, Y. (1999). Bilgisayar destekli öǧretim ve uygulamalar. Ani{dotless} Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k, Ankara.
2. Bahar, M. (2001). Çoktan seçmeli testlere eleştirel bir yaklaşi{dotless}m ve alternatif metotlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eǧitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 23-38.
3. Bahar, M. & Hansell, M. H. (2000). The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association test. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 349-364.
4. Bahar, M. (2006). 4-8. si{dotless}ni{dotless}flar fen ve teknoloji öǧretim programi{dotless}na genel bir baki{dotless}ş (Ed.) M. Bahar Fen ve teknoloji öǧretimi içinde (s. 433-450). Ankara, PegemA Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
5. Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Biçak, B. & Durmuş, S. (2006). Geleneksel ve alternatif ölçme ve deǧerlendirme öǧretmen el kitabi{dotless}, 1. Baski{dotless}. Ankara: Pegem A yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k.
6. Bennett, R. E. (1998). Reinventing asessment: speculations on the future of large-scale educational testing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
7. Bond, D. (1995). Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
8. Burke, M.J. & Normand, A.L. (1987) Computerized psychological testing: overview and critique. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 18, 42-51.
9. Can G. (2000). Ünite 13. Eǧitimde ölçme ve deǧerlendirme (Ed.) M. Gültekin. öǧretimde planlama ve deǧerlendirme içinde (s.207-222). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. Routledge Falmer.
11. Chung, G. K. W. K. & Baker, E. L. (1997). Technology in action/Year 1 technology studies: implications for technology in assessment (CSE Technical Report No. 459). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
12. Dillon, G.F. & Clyman, S.G. (1992). The computerisation of clinical science examinations and its effect on the performance of third year medical students, Academic Medicine, 67, 66-68.
13. Dimock, P.H. & Cormier, P. (1991). The effects of format differences and computer differences on performance. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 24, 119-126.
14. Egan, K. (1972). Structural communication - A new contribution to pedagogy. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1, 63-78.
15. Finegan, J.E. & Allen, N.J. (1994). Computerised and written questionnaires: are they equivalent?, Computers in Human Behaviour, 10, 483-496.
16. Hicken, S. (1993). Administering comprehensive examinations using computers, Collegiate Microcomputer, 11, 194-198.
17. Johnson, D., & White, C. (1980). Effects of training on computerized test performance in the elderly. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 357-358.
18. Johnstone, A. H., Bahar, M., Hansell, M. H. (2000). Structural communication grids: A valuable assessment and diagnostic tool for science teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 87-89.
19. Kapes, J.T. & Vansickle, T.R. (1992). Comparing paper and pencil and computer-based versions of the Harrington O'Shea career decision making model. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 25, 5-13.
20. Lee, J. (1986). The effects of past computer experience on computerized aptitude test performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 727-733.
21. Levine, T., & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1997). Commitment to learning: effects of computer experience, confidence and attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 83-105.
22. Leutner, D. & Weinsier, P.D. (1994). Attitudes towards computers and information technology at three universities in Germany, Belgium and US. Computers in Human Behaviour, 10, 569-591.
23. Lien, A. J. (1976). Measurement and evaluation of learning, Third Edition, Wm. C. Brown. Company Publisher, USA.
24. Maurer, M.M. (1994). Computer anxiety correlates and what they tell us: a literature review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 10, 369-376.
25. Mazzeo, J. (1991). Comparability of computer and paper and pencil scores for two CLEP general examinations. College Board report no. 91-95 (New York, College Board Publications).
26. Mazzeo, J. & Harvey, A. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests: A Review of the Literature. College Board Report 88-8 (New York, College Entrance Examination Board).
27. Mazzeo, J., Druesne, B., Raffeld, P., Checketts, K., & Muhlstein, A. (1991). Comparability of computer and paper-and pencil scores for two CLEP general examinations (College Board report No. 91-5). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
28. Milli Eǧitim Bakanliǧi (2004). İlköǧretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öǧretim programi{dotless} ve ki{dotless}lavuzu (4-5. Si{dotless}ni{dotless}flar). Ankara. MEB yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}.
29. Mooney, G. A., Bligh, J. G., Leinster, S. J. (1998). Some techniques for computer based assessment in medical education. Medical Teacher, 20(6), 560-566.
30. Ogunkola, B. J. (2008). Computer attitude, ownership and use as predictors of computer literacy of science teachers in Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, (inpress), 3(2), 53-57.
31. Özatli, N. S. (2006). Öǧrencilerin biyoloji derslerinde zor olarak algi{dotless}ladi{dotless}klari{dotless} konulari{dotless}n tespiti ve boşalti{dotless}m sistemi konusundaki bilişsel yapi{dotless}lari{dotless}ni{dotless}n yeni teknikler ile ortaya konmasi{dotless}. Doktora Tezi, Bali{dotless}kesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
32. Schacter, J., Herl, H. E., Chung, G. K. W. K., & O'Neil, H. F. (1999). Next generation performance assessments: Reporting performance and process data together using computationally designed assessments [Special issue]. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15(3-4), 403-418.
33. Schwid, H.A. & O'Donnell, D. (1992). Anaestheologists' management of simulated critical incidents. Anaesthiology, 76, 495-501.
34. Stevens, R., Ikeda, J., Casillas, A., Palacio-Cayetano, J., & Clyman, S. (1999). Artificial neural network-based performance assessments. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15(3-4), 295-313.
35. Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F. and Moerkerke, G. (1998). Creating a learning environment by using self-peer and co-assessment. Learning Environment Research, 1(3), 293-319.
36. Thewall, M. (2000). Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool. Computers & Education, 34, 37-49.
37. Underwood, J. D. M., & Brown, J. (1997). Integrated learning systems: potential into practice. London: Heineman.
38. Vansickle, T.R. & Kapes, J.T. (1993) Comparing paper-pencil and computer based versions of the Strong-Campbell interest inventory. Computers in Human Behaviour, 9, 441-449.
39. Yildirim, A., & Şimşek, H. (2000). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araşti{dotless}rma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k, Ankara.