Exploring the effects of changes in future time perspective and perceived instrumentality on graded performance;Exploración de los efectos de cambios en la perspectiva del tiempo futuro, y de la instrumentalidad percibida, sobre rendimiento cualificado

Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1217-1248

  Eren, Altay ^a  

^a ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Future time perspective; Graded performance; Perceived instrumentality; Undergraduate students

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952110557     PISSN: 16995880     EISSN: 16962095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adelabu, D. H. (2007). Time perspective and school membership as correlates to academic achievement among African American adolescents. Adolescence, 42(167), 525-538.
2. Apostolidis, T., Fieulaine, N., & Soulé, (2006). Future time perspective as predictor of cannabis use: Exploring the role of substance perception among French adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 2339-2343.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
4. Bembenutty, H. (2009). Academic delay of gratification, self-regulation of learning, gender differences, and expectancy-value. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 347-352.
5. Bentley, A. M. (1983). Personal and global futurity in Scottish and Swazi students. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 223-229.
6. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
7. Cate, R. A., & John, O. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 186-201.
8. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. Creten, H., Lens, W., & Simons, J. (2001). The role of perceived instrumentality instrumentality in students motivation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 37-45), New York, NY: Kluwer.
10. Daltrey, M. H., & Langer, P. (1984). Development and evaluation of a measure of future time perspective. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(3), 719-725.
11. De Volder, M., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time pesrpective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
12. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. III, pp. 1017-1095). New York: Wiley.
13. Eren, A. (2007). Gelecek zaman perspektifi ölçeǧi (The future time perspective scale). Eǧitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama Dergisi-Educational Sciences and Practice Journal, 6(12), 79-96.
14. Farris, P. J. (1996). Teaching, bearing the torch. Chicago: Brown & Benchmark.
15. Ferrari, J. R., & Diaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Procrastination: Different time orientations reflect different motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 707-714.
16. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17. Fryer, J W., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). Stability and change in achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 700-714.
18. Gjesme, T. (1983). On the concept of future time orientation: Considerations of some functions and measurements' implications. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 443-461.
19. Greene, B. A., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). Gender and orientations toward the future: Links to motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 91-120.
20. Hoogstra, M. A., & Schanz, H. (2008). The future orientation of foresters: An exploratory research among Dutch foresters into the prerequisite for strategic planning in forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 10(4), 220-229.
21. Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703-718.
22. Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 166-175.
23. Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 113-125.
24. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
25. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
26. Kauffman, D. F., & Husman, J. (2004). Effects of time perspective on students motivation: Introduction to a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 1-7.
27. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125-139.
28. Lens, W. (2001). How to combine intrinsic task-motivation with the motivational effects of the instrumentality of present tasks for future goals. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 23-36), New York, NY: Kluwer.
29. Leonardi, A. (2007). Future time perspective, possible selves, and academic achievement. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 114, 17-26.
30. Levy-Tossman, I., Kaplan, A., & Assor, A. (2007). Academic goal orientations, multiple goal profiles, and friendship intimacy among early adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(2), 231-252.
31. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
32. Malka, A., & Covington, M. V. (2005). Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future attainment: Effects on graded performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 60-80.
33. Meade, R. D. (1972). Future time perspectives of Americans and sub-cultures in India. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 93-99.
34. Miller, R. B., DeBacker, T. K., & Grene, B. A. (1999). Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, 250-260.
35. Moé, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2006). Following the instructions!: Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(4), 369-377.
36. Moore, C., & Lemmon, K. (2001). The self in time: Developmental perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. th edition). New York, NY: Pearson.
38. Padawer, E. A., Lawson, J. M. J., Hershey, D. A., & Thomas, D. G. (2007). Demographic indicators as predictors of future time perspective. Current Psychology, 26, 102-108.
39. Pagano, R. R. (2007). Understanding statistics in the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
40. Peetsma, T. T. D. (2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(2), 177-192.
41. Phan, H. P. (2009). Future time perspective in sociocultural contexts: A discussion paper. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 761-778.
42. Ramsden, P. (1993). Learning to teach in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
43. Seginer, R., & Mahajna, S. (2004). How the future orientation of traditional Israeli Palestenian girls links beliefs about women's roles and academic achievement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 122-135.
44. Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 154-168.
45. Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective in achievement and studying. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 481-506.
46. Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2008). Control, motivation, affect, and strategic self-regulation in the college classroom: A multidimensional phenomenon, Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 443-459.
47. Slavin, R. (2003). Educational Psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48. Simons, J., Dewite, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 343-360.
49. Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 121-139.
50. Stouthard, M. E. A., Peetsma, T. D. (1999). Future-time perspective: Analysis of a facetdesigned questionnnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(2), 99-105.
51. th edition). New York, NY: Pearson.
52. Teahan, J. E. (1958). Future time perspective, optimism, and academic achievement. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 57(3), 379-380.
53. Toda, M. (1983). Future time perspective and human cognition: An evolutional view. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 351-365.
54. Ullman, J. B. (2007). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Pearson.
55. Van Calster, K., Lens, W., & Nuttin, J. R. (1987). Affective attitude toward the personal future: Impact on motivation in high school boys. American Journal of Psychology, 100(1), 1-13.
56. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
57. Wallace, M. (1956). Future time perspective in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 240-245.
58. Weinberg, S. L., & Abramowitz, S. K. (2002). Data analysis for the behavioral sciences using SPSS. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
59. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
60. Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. Berkshire, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
61. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.
62. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: the new psychology of time. London: Rider.