An auto-ethnographic perspective on academic entrepreneursnip: Implications for research in the socia sciences and humanities

Academy of Management Perspectives

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 46-61

  Pilegaard, Morten ^a   Moroz, Peter W ^b   Neergaard, Helle ^a  

^a AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

^b Australian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952021892     PISSN: 15589080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2010.50304416     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akerlind, G. S., & Kayrooz, C. (2003). Understanding academic freedom: The views of social scientists. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(3), 327-344-344
2. Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173.
3. Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., & Warning, S. (2004)- University spillovers: Does the kind of science matter? industry & Innovation, 11(3), 193-206.
4. Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2008). Do patents perform like property? Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 8-20.
5. Bygrave, B. (1989). The entrepreneurship paradigm (I): A philosophical look at its research methodologies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 7-26.
6. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696-706.
8. Giddens, A. (1994). The structuration of society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
9. Harman, G. (2005). Australian social scientists and transition to a more commercial university environment. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 79-94.
10. Harrison, R., & Leitch, C. M. (2008). Dynamics of university spin-out companies: Entrepreneurial ventures or technology lifestyle businesses? In B. Clarysse, J. Roure, & T. Schamp (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the financial community (pp. 149-160). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
11. Hindle, K. (2010a, in press). Skilful dreaming: Testing a general model of entrepreneurial process with a "unique" narrative of business formation. Entrepreneurial Narrative: Theory, Epistemology and Research (EN:TER).
12. Hindle, K. (2010b, in press). How community factors affect entrepreneurial process: A diagnostic framework. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development (Special Issue on Social Entrepreneurship).
13. Hindle, K., & Lansdowne, M. (2005). Brave spirits on new paths: Toward a globally relevant paradigm of indigenous entrepreneurship research. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 131-142.
14. Hindle, K., & Yencken, J. (2004). Public research commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: An integrated model. Technovation, 24(10), 793803.
15. Kayrooz, C., Kinnear, P., & Preston, P. (2001). Academic freedom and commercialisation of Australian universities: Perceptions and experiences of social scientists. Canberra: Australia Institute.
16. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710.
17. McDonald, S., Gan, B. C., & Anderson, A. (2004, November 24-26). Studying entrepreneurship: A review of methods employed in entrepreneurship research 1985-2004- Paper presented at the Proceedings of RENT XVIII, LOK Research Center, Copenhagen.
18. Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the BayhDole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99-119. (Pubitemid 33676869)
19. Nelson, A. J. (2005). Cacophony or harmony? Multivocal logics and technology licensing by the Stanford University department of music. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(1), 93-118.
20. North, D. (1987). Institutions, transaction costs and economic growth. Economic Inquiry, 25, 419-428.
21. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Pilegaard, M. (2009). Collaborative repositories: An organisational and technological response to current challenges in specialized knowledge communication? Revue Francaise de Linguistique Appliqué, 14(2), 57-72.
23. O'Shea, R. P., Chevalier, A., Roche, F., & Allen, T. J. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1007.
24. Rothaermel, F., Agung, S., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature, industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791. (Pubitemid 47323947)
25. Sarason, Y., Dean, T., & Dillard, J. F. (2006). Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286-305. (Pubitemid 43467701)
26. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-288.
27. Shane, S. (2002). Executive forum: University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 537-552.
28. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
29. Shane, S. (2007). The illusion of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Stephan, P. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199-1235.
31. Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.
32. Thursby, J., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 59-72. (Pubitemid 33809465)
33. Trochim, W. (2005). Research methods: The concise knowledge base. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.
34. Van de Ven, A. H., & Engleman, R. M. (2004). Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 343-358.
35. Wallerstein, I. (1996). Open the social sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the restructuring of the social sciences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. Ziedonis, R. H. (2008). On the apparent failure of patents: A response to Bessen and Meurer. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 21-29.