Executive forum: University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 537-552

  Shane, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurship; Technology transfer; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036791111     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00084-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blumenthal, D., 1992. Academic-industry relationships in the life sciences. JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 268 (3), 3344-3349.
2. Brooks, H., Randazze, L., 1998. University-industry relations: the next four years and beyond. In: Branscomb, L., Keller, J. (Eds.), Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy that Works. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 361-399.
3. Business-Higher Education Forum, 1988. Beyond the Rhetoric: Evaluating University-Industry Cooperation in Research and Technology Exchange. Business-Higher Education Forum, Washington.
4. Cohen, W., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., Walsh, J., 1998. Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In: Noll, R. (Ed.), Challenges to Research Universities. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 171-200.
5. Etzkowitz, H., 1989. Entrepreneurial science in the academy: a case of the transformation of norms. Soc. Probl. 36 (1), 14-29.
6. Etzkowitz, H., 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Res. Policy 27, 823-833.
7. Florida, R., Kenney, M., 1990. The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America's Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production. Basic Books, New York.
8. Government University Industry Research Roundtable, 1990. Survey to Assess the Usefulness of Two Model Agreements for University-Industry Cooperative Research. Government University Industry Research Round-table, Washington, DC.
9. Government University Industry Research Roundtable, 1991. Industrial Perspectives on Interactions with Universities: Summary of Interviews with Senior Industrial Officials. National Academy Press, Washington.
10. Harmon, B., Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, R., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., Raghian, M., Smith, D., 1997. Mapping the university technology transfer process. J. Bus. Venturing 12 (1), 423-434.
11. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., 1988. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Rev. Econ. Stat. 65, 119-127.
12. Jensen, R., Thursby, M., 2001. Proofs and prototypes for sale: the tale of university licensing. Am. Econ. Rev. 91 (1), 240-257.
13. Lee, Y., 1996. Technological transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Res. Policy 25, 843-863.
14. Lee, Y., 1999. University-industry collaboration on technological innovation: assessing behavioral outcomes. Final Report to the National Science Foundation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
15. Mansfield, E., Lee, Y., 1996. The modern university: contributions to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Res. Policy 25, 1047-1058.
16. Mowery, D., 1998, Fall. Collaborative R&D: how effective is it? Issues Sci. Technol., 37-44.
17. Postlewait, A., Parker, D., Zilberman, D., 1993. The advent of biotechnology and technology transfer in agriculture. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 43, 271-287.
18. Pressman, L., 1997. The strategic use of patents: The M.I.T. experience. Working Paper, Massachusets Institute of Technology.
19. Pressman, L., Guterman, S., Abrams, I., Geist, D., Nelsen, L., 1995. Pre-production investment and jobs induced by MIT exclusive patent licenses: a preliminary model to measure the economic impact of university licensing. J. Assoc. Univ. Technol. Managers 7, 49-82.
20. Rosenberg, N., Nelson, R., 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Res. Policy 23, 323-348.
21. Shane, S., 2001a. Technology opportunity and firm formation. Manage. Sci. 47 (2), 205-220.
22. Shane, S., 2001b. Technology regimes and firm formation. Manage. Sci. 47 (9), 1173-1190.
23. Shane, S., Cable, D., forthcoming. Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Manage. Sci.
24. Shane, S., Khurana, R., 2001. Best Papers Proceedings of the Academy of Management 2001 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 6-8.
25. Tornatzky, L., Waugaman, P., Casson, L., 1995. Benchmarking Best Practices For University-Industry Technology Transfer: Working with Start-Up Companies. Southern Technology Council, Research Triangle, NC.
26. Tornatzky, L., Waugaman, P., Gray, D., 1999. Industry-University Technology Transfer: Models of Alternative Practice, Policy and Program. Southern Technology Council, Research Triangle, NC.
27. Vedovello, C., 1997. Science parks and university-industry interaction: geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation 17 (9), 491-502.
28. Wallmark, J., 1997. Inventions and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers Institute of Technology. Technovation 17 (3), 127-139.
29. Woolgar, S., 1998. Abilities and competencies required, particularly by small firms to identify and acquire new technology. Technovation 18 (8/9), 575-584.
30. Zucker, L., Darby, M., Armstrong, J., 1998. Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets? Econ. Inquiry 36, 65-86.