Analysis of protein-protein docking decoys using interaction fingerprints: Application to the reconstruction of CaM-ligand complexes

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Uchikoga, Nobuyuki ^a,b   Hirokawa, Takatsugu ^b  

^a Koto ku   (Japan)

^b Japan Biological Information Research Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE; CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE; FINGERPRINT METHOD; MEASURING SIMILARITIES; PROTEIN STRUCTURES; PROTEIN-PROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY;

CAMS; CELL MEMBRANES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPLEXATION; ENZYMES; LIGANDS;

CALMODULIN;

CALMODULIN; LIGAND; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEOMICS;

BINDING SITES; CALMODULIN; LIGANDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 77951965443     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-236     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dunker AK, Cortese MS, Romero P, Iakoucheva LM, Uversky VN. Flexible nets: the roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. FEBS Journal 2005, 272:5129-5148. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04948.x, 16218947.
2. Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, BarabaÂsi AL. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407:651-654. 10.1038/35036627, 11034217.
3. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411:41-42. 10.1038/35075138, 11333967.
4. Patil A, Nakamura H. Disordered domains and high surface charge confer hubs with the ability to interact with multiple proteins in interaction networks. FEBS Letter 2006, 580:2041-2045.
5. Higurashi M, Ishida T, Kinoshita K. Identification of transient hub proteins and the possible structural basis for their multiple interactions. Protein Sci 2008, 17:72-78. 10.1110/ps.073196308, 2144588, 18156468.
6. May A, Zacharias M. Accounting for global protein deformability during protein-protein and protein-ligand docking. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005, 1754:225-231.
7. Król M, Chaleil RAG, Tournier AL, Bates PA. Implicit flexibility in protein docking: cross-docking and local refinement. Proteins 2007, 69:750-757. 10.1002/prot.21698, 17671977.
8. Lensink MF, Méndez R, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins 2007, 69:704-718. 10.1002/prot.21804, 17918726.
9. May A, Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility. Proteins 2007, 69:774-780. 10.1002/prot.21735, 17803217.
10. May A, Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008, 70:794-809. 10.1002/prot.21579, 17729269.
11. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-porotein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005, 347:1077-1101. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.058, 15784265.
12. Heifetz A, Eisenstein M. Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Protein Engineering 2003, 16:179-185. 10.1093/proeng/gzg021, 12702797.
13. Carter P, Lesk VI, Islam SA, Sternberg MJE. Protein-protein docking using 3D-Dock in rounds 3, 4, and 5 of CAPRI. Proteins 2006, 60:281-288.
14. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acid Research 2003, 31:3370-3374.
15. Deng Z, Chuaqui C, Singh J. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. J Med Chem 2004, 47:337-344. 10.1021/jm030331x, 14711306.
16. Marcou G, Rognan D. Optimizing fragment and scaffold docking by use of molecular interaction fingerprints. J Chem Inf Model 2007, 47:195-207. 10.1021/ci600342e, 17238265.
17. Contessa GM, Orsale M, Melino S, Torre V, Paci M, Desideri A, Cicero DO. Structure of calmodulin comlexed with an olfactory CNG channel fragment and role of central linker: residual dipolar couplings to evaluate calmodulin binding modes outside the kinase family. J Biomol NMR 2005, 31:185-199. 10.1007/s10858-005-0165-1, 15803393.
18. Osawa M, Tokumitsu H, Swindells MB, Kurihara H, Orita M, Shibanuma T, Furuya T, Ikura M. A novel target recognition revealed by calmodulin in complex with Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase. Nat Struct Biol 1999, 6:819-924. 10.1038/12271, 10467092.
19. Elshorst B, Hennig M, Foeresterling H, Diener A, Maurer M, Schulte P, Schwalbe H, Griesinger C, Jrebs J, Schmid H, Vorherr T, Carafoli E. NMR solution structure of a complex of calmodulin with a binding peptide of the Ca2+ pump. Biochemistry 1999, 38:12320-12332. 10.1021/bi9908235, 10493800.
20. Zhang M, Tanaka T, Ikura M. Calcium-induced conformational transition revealed by the solution structure of apo calmodulin. Nat struct biol 1995, 2:758-767. 10.1038/nsb0995-758, 7552747.
21. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: and initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003, 52:80-87. 10.1002/prot.10389, 12784371.
22. Chen R, Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 2002, 47:281-294. 10.1002/prot.10092, 11948782.
23. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003, 12:2001-2014. 10.1110/ps.03154503, 2323997, 12930999.
24. Pierce B, Weng Z. ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins 2007, 67:1078-1086. 10.1002/prot.21373, 17373710.
25. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 1995, 8:127-134. 10.1093/protein/8.2.127, 7630882.
26. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychol Rev 1977, 84:327-352.
27. Holliday JD, Salim N, Whittle M, Willet P. Analysis and display of the size dependence of chemical similarity coefficients. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003, 43:819-828.