Sexual conflict and reproductive isolation in flies

Biology Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 697-699

  Hosken, D J ^a   Martin, O Y ^b   Wigby, S ^c   Chapman, T ^d   Hodgson, D J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diptera; Divergence; Prezygotic isolation; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DIVERGENCE; FLY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FLY; MALE; NONHUMAN; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEPSIS CYNIPSEA; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; SEPSIS CYNIPSEA;

EID: 70349275285     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0066     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allen, G. R. & Simmons, L. W. 1996 Coercive mating, fluctuating asymmetry, and male mating success in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Anim. Behav. 52, 737-741. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0218)
2. Bacigalupe, L. D., Crudgington, H. S., Hunter, F., Moore, A. J. & Snook, R. R. 2007 Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1763-1771. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01389.x)
3. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Costs of mating in Drosophila females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241-244. (doi:10.1038/373241a0)
4. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. 2004 Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
5. Gavrilets, S. 2000 Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403, 886-888. (doi:10.1038/35002564)
6. Hosken, D. J., Taylor, M. L., Hoyle, K., Higgins, S. & Wedell, N. 2008 Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 18, R553-R554. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.028)
7. Lande, R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic characters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725. (doi:10.1073/pnas.78.6. 3721)
8. Lessells, C. M. 2006 The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 301-317. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1795)
9. Martin, O. Y. & Hosken, D. J. 2003a The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423, 979-982. (doi:10.1038/ nature01752)
10. Martin, O. Y. & Hosken, D. J. 2003b Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy. Evolution 57, 2765-2772. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01518.x)
11. Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (eds M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum), pp. 123-166. London, UK: Academic Press.
12. Parker, G. A. 2006 Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 235-259. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1785)
13. Parker, G. A. & Partridge, L. 1998 Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 261-274. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0208)
14. Pitnick, S. & García-González, F. 2002 Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1821-1828. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2090)
15. Powell, J. R. 1997 Progress and prospects in evolutionary biology: the Drosophila model. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Rice, W. R. 1996 Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381, 232-234. (doi:10.1038/381232a0)
17. Rice, W. R. 1998 Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonisic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In Endless forms: species and speciation (eds D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher), pp. 261-270. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2004 Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict. Evolution 58, 1028-1037. (doi:10.1554/03-568)
19. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2005 Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15, 316-321. (doi:10.1016/j.cub. 2005.01.051)
20. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2006 No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1033-1039. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2006.01107.x)