Respect for persons in the intergroup context: Self-other overlap and intergroup emotions as mediators of the impact of respect on action tendencies

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 301-317

  Laham, Simon M ^a   Tam, Tania ^b   Lalljee, Mansur ^c   Hewstone, Miles ^c   Voci, Alberto ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b Legal Services Commission   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Action tendencies; Intergroup emotions; Respect for persons; Self other overlap

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951645570     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430209344606     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
2. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103, 411-423.
3. Arbuckle, J.L. (2005). Amos 6 [Computer Software]. Chicago: SmallWaters Corp.
4. Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63, 596-612.
5. Aron, A., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2001). Including others in the self: Extensions to own and partner's group memberships. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 89-108). New York: Psychology Press.
6. Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S.C., & Aron, E.N. (2004). Including others in the self. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 101-132). Hove: Psychology Press.
7. Branscombe, N., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28, 744-753.
8. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Scale construction. In R. Christie & F. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 388-400). New York: Academic Press.
9. Cialdini, R.B., Brown, S.L., Lewis, B.P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S.L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy- altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481-494.
10. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cottrell, C.A., & Neuberg, S.L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,88,770-789.
12. Crisp, R.J., Heuston, S., Farr, M.J., & Turner, R.N. (2007). Seeing red or feeling blue: Differentiated intergroup emotions and ingroup identification in soccer fans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,10, 9-26.
13. Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648.
14. Davis, M.H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
15. Dillon, R.S. (2007). Respect: A philosophical perspective. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung [Group dynamics and organisation consulting], 38, 201-212.
16. Ekehammar, B., & Akrami, N. (2003). The relation between personality and prejudice: A variable-versus a person-centred approach. European Journal of Personality, 17, 449-464.
17. Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172.
18. Frey, F.E., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review,10, 265-280.
19. Frijda, N.H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Anastasio, P.A., Bachman, B.A., & Rust, M.C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). New York: Wiley.
21. Galinsky, A.D., & Ku, G. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: The moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,30, 594-604.
22. Galinsky, A.D., Ku, G., & Wang, C.S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,8, 109-124.
23. Galinsky, A.D., & Moskowitz, G.B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78,708-724.
24. Goldberg, L.R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
25. Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R.,et al.(2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality,40, 84-96.
26. Hamilton, D.L., & Fallot, R.D. (1974). Information salience as a weighting factor in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 444-448.
27. Heaven, P.C.L., & Bucci, S. (2001). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the ipip measure. European Journal of Personality,15, 49-56.
28. International Personality Item Pool (IPIP). http://1ipip.ori.org/newNEOKey.htm#Agreeableness (accessed 4 November, 2009).
29. Kant, I. (1785/1997). Grundlegung zu Metaphysik der Sitten, translated as Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals, by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Kant, I. (1797/1996). Metaphysik der Sitten[Metaphysics of morals] (Trans. Mary Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). London: Guilford Press.
32. Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Lalljee, M., Laham, S. & Tam, T. (2007). Unconditional respect for persons: A social psychological analysis. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung [Group dynamics and organisation consulting],38, 451-464.
34. Lalljee, M., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Laham, S.M., & Lee, J. (2009). Unconditional respect for persons and the prediction of intergroup action tendencies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 666-683.
35. Lippa, R., & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463-493.
36. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling,9, 151-173.
37. MacCallum, R.C., & Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modelling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology,51, 201-226.
38. Mackie, D.M., Devos, T., & Smith, E.R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79,602-616.
39. Mackie, D.M., & Smith, E.R. (2002). Intergroup emotions and the social self: Prejudice reconceptualized as differentiated reactions to outgroups. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives (pp. 309-326). New York: Psychology Press.
40. Miller, D.A., Smith, E.R., & Mackie, D.M. (2004). Effects of intergroup contact and political predispositions on prejudice: Role of intergroup emotions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,7,221-237.
41. Monteith, M.J., & Walters, G.L. (1998). Egalitarianism, moral obligation and prejudice-related personal standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 186-199.
42. Moskowitz, G.B., Gollwitzer, P.M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77, 167-184.
43. Pervin, L., Cervone, D., & Oliver, J. (2005). Theories of personality (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
44. Pettigrew, T.F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,23, 173-185.
45. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
46. Prestwich, A., & Lalljee, M. (in press). The determinants and consequences of intragroup respect: An examination within a sporting context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
47. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
48. Roseman, I.J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology,5, 11-36.
49. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P.S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,9, 283-294.
50. Scherer, K.R. (1988). Criteria for emotion-antecedent appraisal: A review. In. V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation(pp. 89-126). New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers.
51. Schubert, T.W., & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of self, ingroup and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self and Identity,1, 353-376.
52. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67,998-1011.
53. Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29, 183-193.
54. Smith, C.A., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48, 813-838.
55. Smith, E.R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception(pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
56. Smith, E.R., Seger, C.R., & Mackie, D.M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group-level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93, 431-446.
57. Smith, H.J., & Tyler, T.R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,33, 146-170.
58. Smyth, M., & Hamilton, J. (2003). The human costs of The Troubles. In O. Hargie & D. Dickson (Eds.), Researching the troubles: Social science perspectives on the Northern Ireland conflict(pp. 15-36). London: Oxford University Press.
59. Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Tausch, N., Maio, G., & Kenworthy, J. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions of forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,10, 119-135.
60. Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., Voci, A., & Cairns, E., (2006). Positive emotions in intergroup conflict? The mediational role of intergroup emotions and empathy in contact between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland. Unpublished Manuscript.
61. Turner, R.N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,95, 843-860.
62. Wohl, M.J.A., & Branscombe, N.R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,88, 288-303.
63. Wright, S.C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S.A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73,73-90.
64. Wright, S.C., Aron, A., & Tropp, L.R. (2002). Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives (pp. 343-363). New York: Psychology Press.