Gender, Personality, and Prejudice: The Display of Authoritarianism and Social Dominance in Interviews with College Men and Women

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 463-493

  Lippa, Richard ^a   Arad, Sara ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001483425     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.1999.2266     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adorno T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D. J., Sanford R. N. The authoritarian personality. 1950;Harper & Row, New York.
2. Altemeyer B. Right-wing authoritarianism. 1981;University of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg.
3. Altemeyer B. Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. 1988;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
4. Altemeyer B. The other "authoritarian personality." Zanna M. P. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1998;47-92 Academic Press, San Diego.
5. Beck A. T., Ward C. H., Medelson M., Mock J., Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry. 4:1961;53-63.
6. Brown R. Social psychology. 1965;Free Press, New York.
7. Buss A. H., Perry M. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 62:1992;452-459.
8. Christie R., Jahoda M. Studies in the scope and method of "The authoritarian personality." 1954;Free Press, New York.
9. Doty R. M., Peterson B. E., Winter D. G. Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61:1991;629-640.
10. Duckitt J. Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology. 10:1989;63-84.
11. Duncan L. E., Peterson B. E., Winter D. G. Authoritarianism and gender roles: Toward a psychological analysis of hegemonic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 23:1997;41-49.
12. Eagly A. H., Mladinic A., Otto S. Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 15:1991;203-216.
13. Funder D. C. On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review. 102:1995;652-670.
14. Funder D. C., Dobroth K. M. Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52:1987;409-418.
15. Herek G. M. The instrumentality of attitudes: Toward a neofunctional theory. Journal of Social Issues. 42:1986;99-114.
16. Herek G. M. Can functions be measures? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly. 50:1987;285-503.
17. Horowitz L. M., Rosenberg S. E., Bauer B. A., Ureno G., Billasenor V. S. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 56:1988;885-892.
18. John O. P. The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language. Pervin L. A. Handbood of personality: Theory and research. 1990;66-100 Guilford, New York.
19. John O. P., Robins R. W. Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality. 61:1993;521-551.
20. Kenny D. A. Interpersonal perception. 1994;Guilford, New York.
21. Kite M. E., Whitley B. E. Jr. Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? Herek G. M. Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay issues. 1998;Sage, Thousand Oaks.
22. Lippa R. Some psychometric characteristics of gender diagnosticity measures: Reliability, validity, consistency across domains, and relationship to the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61:1991;1000-1011.
23. Lippa R. Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the Big Five and circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 69:1995;1184-1202.
24. Lippa R. Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the "People-Things" dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74:1998;996-1009.
25. Lippa R., Connelly S. C. Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59:1990;1051-1065.
26. McCrae R. R., Costa P. T. Validation of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52:1987;81-90.
27. McCrae R. R., Costa P. T. Jr. Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. Hogan R., Johnson J., Briggs S. Handbook of personality psychology. 1997;825-847 Academic Press, San Diego.
28. McFarland, S. G, &, Adelson, S. 1997, An omnibus study of individual differences and prejudice. Unpublished manuscript, Western Kentucky University.
29. Meloen J. D. The F Scale as a predictor of fascism: An overview of 40 years of authoritarianism research. Stone W. F., Lederer G., Christie R. Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today. 1993;47-69 Springer-Verlag, New York.
30. Peterson B. E., Doty R. M., Winter D. G. Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 19:1993;174-184.
31. Pratto F. The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. Zanna M. P. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1999;191-263 Academic Press, San Diego.
32. Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L., Malle B. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67:1994;741-763.
33. Pratto F., Stallworth L. M., Sidanius J., Siers B. The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 72:1997;37-53.
34. Rokeach M. Beliefs, attitudes, and values. 1968;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
35. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. 1965;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
36. Rosenthal R. Methodology. Tesser A. Advanced social psychology. 1995;17-49 McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Shils E. A. Authoritarianism: "Right" and "left." Christie R., Jahoda M. Studies in the scope and method of "The authoritarian personality." 1954;Free Press, New York.
38. Sidanius J., Pratto R. The inevitability of prejudice and the dynamics of social dominance. Sniderman P., Tetlock P. E. Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma. 1993;173-210 Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford.
39. Sidanius J., Pratto F., Bobo L. Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67:1994;998-1011.
40. Sidanius J., Pratto F., Brief D. Group dominance and the political psychology of gender: a cross-cultural comparison. Political Psychology. 16:1994;381-396.
41. Sidanius J., Pratto R., Mitchell M. Group identity, social dominance orientation, and intergroup discrimination: Some implications of social dominance theory. Journal of Social Psychology. 134:1994;151-167.
42. Spence J. T., Helmreich R. L. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. 1978;Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.
43. Stone W. R. The myth of left-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology. 2:1980;3-19.
44. Stone W. F., Lederer G., Christie R. Strength and weakness: The authoritarian personality today. 1993;Springer-Verlag, New York.
45. Storms M. D. Sex role identity and its relationship to sex role attributions and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37:1979;1779-1789.
46. Whitley B. E. Jr. Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77:1999;126-134.