Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 744-753

  Branscombe, Nyla R ^a   Spears, Russell ^b   Ellemers, Naomi ^c   Doosje, Bertjan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044532340     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202289004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M.T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
3. Dittes, J. E., & Kelley, H. (1956). Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 100-107.
4. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
5. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 4 (pp. 27-57.). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
6. Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
7. Ellemers, N., Van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198.
8. Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Click, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
9. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage Ltd.
10. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
11. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Jackson, J. M., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1958). The effect of person-group relationships on conformity processes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 17-24.
13. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Spears, R. (2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204-1213.
14. Lee, Y. T., & Ottati, V. (1995). Perceived in-group homogeneity as a function of group membership salience and stereotype threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 610-619.
15. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Selfevaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
16. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
17. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
18. Noel, J., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137.
19. Ouwerkerk, J. W., de Gilder, D., & de Vries, N. K. (2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550-1559.
20. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination in disadvantaged and privileged social groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, 12, 167-199.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
22. Seta, C. E.,&Seta, J.J. (1992). Observers and participants in an intergroup setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 629-643.
23. Seta, J. J., & Seta, C. E. ( 1996). Big fish in small ponds: A social hierarchy analysis of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1210-1221.
24. Sigelman, L., & Welch, S. (1991). Black Americans' views of racial inequality: The dream deferred. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Slater, P. E. (1955). Role differentiation in small groups. American Sociological Review, 20, 300-310.
26. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170.
27. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctivencss: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
28. Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.
29. Tajfel, H. (1978). The social psychology of minorities. London: Minority Rights Group.
30. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
31. Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M., & Bundy, R. P. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
32. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory' of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
33. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P.J., & Smith, P. M. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 97-111.
34. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H.J. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
35. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H.J. (1999).Justice, social identity, and group processes. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 223-264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Worchel, S., luzzini, J., Coutant, D., & Ivaldi, M. (2000). A multidimensional model of identity: Relating individual and group identities to intergroup behavior. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes (pp. 15-32). London: Sage Ltd.