Predictors of response to intervention of word reading fluency in dutch

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 212-228

  Scheltinga, Femke ^a   van der Leij, Aryan ^a   Struiksma, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b CED Groep   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Orthography; Phonology; Prediction; Reading problems; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; MEMORY; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; LEARNING DISORDERS; PSYCHOLOGY;

CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; MEMORY; NETHERLANDS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 77951619107     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219409345015     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Al-Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300-316.
2. Badian, N.A. (1998). A validation of the role of preschool phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(5), 472-481.
3. Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Zook, D., Ogier, S., Lemos-Britton, Z., & Brooksher, R. (1999). Early intervention for reading disabilities: Teaching the alphabet principle in a connectionist framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(6), 491-503.
4. Bishop, D.V.M., & Snowling, M.J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 858-886.
5. Blok, H., Otter, M.E., Overmaat, M., de Glopper, K., & Hoeksma, J.B. (2003). Literacy programs for initial reading instruction: Do they make a difference in learning outcomes? Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(4), 357-371.
6. Booth, J.R., Perfetti, C.A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 3-19.
7. Bowers, P.G. (1995). Tracing symbol naming speed's unique contributions to reading disabilities over time. Reading and Writing, 7(2), 189-216.
8. Bowers, P., Golden, J., Kennedy, A., & Young, A. (1994). Limits upon orthographic knowledge due to processes indexed by naming speed. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge, I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 173-218). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
9. Bowers, P.G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5(1), 69-85.
10. Bowey, J.A. (2005). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 155-172). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11. Burns, M.K., Appleton, J.J., & Stehouwer, J.D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 381-394.
12. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 751-774.
13. Case, L.P., Speece, D.L., & Molloy, D.E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32(4), 557-582.
14. Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 631-644.
15. Clarfield, J., & Stoner, G. (2005). Research brief: The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 246-254.
16. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing, 14(5-6), 549-568.
18. Dally, K. (2006). The influence of phonological processing and inattentive behavior on reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 420-437.
19. de Jong, P.F., & Olson, R.K. (2004). Early predictors of letter knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88(3), 254-273.
20. de Jong, P.F., & Oude Vrielink, L. (2004). Rapid automatic naming: Easy to measure, hard to improve (quickly). Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 65-88.
21. de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 450-476.
22. de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 51-77.
23. de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 22-40.
24. Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., & Francis, D.J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 447-466.
25. Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167-188.
26. Fletcher, J.M., Coulter, W.A., Reschly, D.J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(2), 304-331.
27. Foulin, J.N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129-155.
28. Fuchs, D., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, L.S., Bryant, J., & Davis, G.N. (2008). Making secondary intervention work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 413-436.
29. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99.
30. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(3), 157-171.
31. Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(3), 259-272.
32. Gathercole, S.E., Willis, C.S., Baddeley, A.D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The Children's Test of Nonword Repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2(2), 103-127.
33. Hagiliassis, N., Pratt, C., & Johnston, M. (2006). Orthographic and phonological processes in reading. Reading and Writing, 19(3), 235-263.
34. Hatcher, P.J., & Hulme, C. (1999). Phonemes, rhymes, and intelligence as predictors of children's responsiveness to remedial reading instruction: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(2), 130-153.
35. Hintikka, S., Aro, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2005). Computerized training of the correspondences between phonological and orthographic units. Written Language and Literacy, 8(2), 155-178.
36. Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 401-413.
37. Kail, R., Hall, L.K., & Caskey, B.J. (1999). Processing speed, exposure to print, and naming speed. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(2), 303-314.
38. Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150-161.
39. Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63(3), 315-334.
40. Levine, J.H. (1993). Exceptions are the rule: An inquiry into methods in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
41. Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P.T., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Determining English language learners' response to intervention: Questions and some answers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 185-195.
42. Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P.T. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 390-398.
43. Lovett, M.W., Benson, N.J., & Olds, J. (1990). Individual difference predictors of treatment outcome in the remediation of specific reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(3), 287-314.
44. Lovett, M.W., Borden, S.L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N.J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 805-822.
45. Martens, V.E.G., & de Jong, P.F. (2008). Effects of repeated reading on the length effect in word and pseudoword reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 40-54.
46. Mauer, D.M., & Kamhi, A.G. (1996). Factors that influence phoneme-grapheme correspondence learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 259-270.
47. McBride-Chang, C. (1999). The ABCs of the ABCs: The development of letter-name and letter-sound knowledge. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 45(2), 285-308.
48. McBride-Chang, C., & Manis, F.-R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 8(4), 323-339.
49. McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 445-463.
50. McNaughton, S., Glynn, T., & Robinson, V. (1987). Pause Prompt Praise: Effective remedial reading tutoring. Birmingham: Positive Product.
51. Moelands, F., Kamphuis, F., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Verantwoording Drie Minuten Toets [Justification of Three Minute Test]. Arnhem, Netherlands: Cito.
52. Näslund, J.C., & Schneider, W. (1996). Kindergarten letter knowledge, phonological skills, and memory processes: Relative effects on early literacy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62(1), 30-59.
53. Nelson, J.R., Benner, G.J., & Gonzalez, J. (2003). Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(4), 255-267.
54. Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. Reid Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243-277). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
55. O'Shaughnessy, T.E., & Swanson, H.L. (2000). A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 257-277.
56. Pennington, B.F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385-413.
57. Perfetti, C.A. (1992).The representation in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D.V.M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3), 235-257.
59. Ritchey, K.D., & Speece, D.L. (2004). Early identification of reading disabilities: Current status and new directions. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(4), 13-24.
60. Ritchey, K.D., & Speece, D.L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301-327.
61. Savage, R., & Frederickson, N. (2005). Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed. Brain and Language, 93(2), 152-159.
62. Scheltinga, F. (2003). The Dutch Nonword Repetition Test. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
63. Schneider, W., Ennemoser, M., Roth, E., & Kuspert, P. (1999). Kindergarten prevention of dyslexia: Does training in phonological awareness work for everybody? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(5), 429-436.
64. Seymour, P.H.K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J.M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174.
65. Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218.
66. Snowling, M.J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
67. Spira, E.G., Bracken, S.S., & Fischel, J.E. (2005). Predicting improvement after first-grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behavior skills. Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 225-234.
68. Stage, S.A., Abbott, R.D., Jenkins, J.R., & Berninger, V.W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word readings discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 24-33.
69. Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 24-53.
70. Stevens, J.P. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71. Struiksma, A.J.C. (1996). Wacht, Hint en Prijs [Wait, hint and praise]. Rotterdam: Pedologisch Instituut.
72. Struiksma, A.J.C. (2003). Lezen gaat voor! [Reading precedes]. Dissertation. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
73. Struiksma, A.J.C., Scheltinga, F., & van Efferen-Wiersma, E. (2006). De Rotterdamse Aanpak Dyslexie, evaluatie van een project [The Rotterdam Approach Dyslexia, Evaluation of a project]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 45, 170-180.
74. Struiksma, A.J.C., van der Leij, A., & van der Stoel, R. (in press). Response to fluency-oriented intervention of Dutch poor readers. Learning and Individual Differences.
75. Struiksma, A.J.C., van der Leij, A., & Vieijra, J.P.M. (2004). Diagnostiek van technisch lezen en aanvankelijk spellen [Diagnostics of technical reading and beginning spelling] (7th ed.). Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
76. Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(1), 55-64.
77. Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33-58.
78. Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-355). Parkton, MD: York Press.
79. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T.,et al.(1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 579-593.
80. Uhry, J.K., & Shepherd, M.J. (1997). Teaching phonological recoding to young children with phonological processing deficits: The effect on sight-vocabulary acquisition. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 104-125.
81. van den Bos, K.P., Zijlstra, B.J.H., & Lutje Spelberg, H.C. (2002). Life-span data on continuous-naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects, and word-reading speed. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 25-49.
82. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to intervention: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 137-146.
83. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to intervention as a means of identifying students with reading/ learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 391-409.
84. Vaughn, S., Mathes, P.G., Linan-Thompson, S., & Francis, D.J. (2005). Teaching English language learners at risk for reading disabilities to read: Putting research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 58-67.
85. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 223-238.
86. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R.,et al.(1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601-638.
87. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D.P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 157-169.
88. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Tanzman, M.S. (1998). The case for early intervention in diagnosing specific reading disability. Journal of School Psychology, 36(4), 367-397.
89. Verhoeven, L. (1995). Drie Minuten Toets: Handleiding [Three Minute Test: Manual]. Arnhem: CITO.
90. Wile, T.L., & Borowsky, R. (2004). What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 47-62.
91. Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(1), 1-33.
92. Wimmer, H. (1996). The early manifestation of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from German children. Reading and Writing, 8(2), 171-188.
93. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill-automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(4), 321-340.
94. Wise, B.W., Ring, J., & Olson, R.K. (2000). Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(3), 197-235.
95. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415-438.
96. Yap, R., & van der Leij, A. (1993). Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit? Reading and Writing, 5(3), 261-279.
97. Yoder, P., & Compton, D. (2004). Identifying predictors of treatment response. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(3), 162-168.
98. Zoccolotti, P., De Luca, M., Di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme phoneme correspondences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(2), 191-216.