Measuring participation among persons with spinal cord injury: Comparison of three instruments

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 49-62

  Noonan, Vanessa K ^a   Kopec, Jacek A ^a   Noreau, Luc ^b   Singer, Joel ^a   Mĝsse, Louise C ^a   Zhang, Hongbin ^a   Dvorak, Marcel F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION   (Canada)

Author keywords

Functioning; Participation; Spinal cord injury; Validity; World Health Organization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; IMPACT ON PARTICIPATION AND AUTONOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTICIPATION MEASURE POST ACUTE CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE II;

EID: 77951466125     PISSN: 10820744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/sci1504-49     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to Consequences of Diseases. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
3. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Post M, Asano M. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29:147-156.
4. Cardol M, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, et al. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:27-35. (Pubitemid 34100548)
5. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:170-180. (Pubitemid 30184616)
6. Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Dvorak MF. A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1883-1901.
7. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:210-216. (Pubitemid 32147890)
8. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE Jr. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post- Acute Care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;86:57-71.
9. World Health Organization. WHODAS II. Available at: http://www.who.int/ icidh/whodas. Revised November 2001. Accessed March 10, 2006.
10. Magasi SR, Heinemann AW, Whiteneck GG. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:145-156.
11. Noonan VK, Miller WC, Noreau L. A review of instruments assessing participation in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:435-446.
12. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning and Disability Beta-2 Draft Full Version. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
13. Lund ML, Fisher AG, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:156-162.
14. Lund ML, Nordlund A, Bernspang B, Lexell J. Perceived participation and problems in participation are determinants of life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1417-1422. (Pubitemid 47343370)
15. Hoenig H, McIntyre L, Sloane R, et al. The reliability of a self-reported measure of disease, impairment, and function in persons with spinal cord dysfunction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:378-387. (Pubitemid 28204615)
16. Hoenig H, Branch LG, McIntyre L, Hoff J, Horner RD. The validity in persons with spinal cord injury of a self-reported functional measure derived from the functional independence measure. Spine. 1999;24:539-543. (Pubitemid 29136045)
17. Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:239-246.
18. Hudson M, Steele R, Taillefer S, Baron M. Quality of life in systemic sclerosis: psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:270-278. (Pubitemid 351272965)
19. Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich MT, et al. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:855-864.
20. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:156-163. (Pubitemid 36418272)
21. Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S50-S56.
22. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34-42.
23. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193-205.
24. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr., Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF- 36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-263.
25. Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD et al. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:793-803. (Pubitemid 46940504)
26. Pösl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:1521-1531. (Pubitemid 47566327)
27. Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif. 2005;9:111-126. (Pubitemid 41566993)
28. van Baalen B, Odding E, van Woensel MP, Roebroeck ME. Reliability and sensitivity to change of measurement instruments used in a traumatic brain injury population. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:686-700. (Pubitemid 44295106)