A review of instruments assessing participation in persons with spinal cord injury

Spinal Cord

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 435-446

  Noonan, V K ^a,d   Miller, W C ^a   Noreau, L ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION   (Canada)

^d NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Measurement; Participation; Reliability; Spinal cord injury; Validity

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT OF LIFE HABITS SCALE; CANADA; CINAHL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRAIG HANDICAP ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING TECHNIQUE; EMBASE; HUMAN; IMPACT ON PARTICIPATION AND AUTONOMY QUESTIONNAIRE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; MEDLINE; OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE HISTORY INTERVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY RECALL ASSESSMENT FOR PEOPLE WITH SPINAL CORD; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCINFO; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REINTEGRATION TO NORMAL LIVING INDEX; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD INJURY; VALIDITY;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 67651100930     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: 14765624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2008.171     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. World Health Organization. World report on Disability and Rehabilitation: Concept Note. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2006.
2. Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB (ed). Sociology and Rehabilitation. American Sociological Association: Washington, DC, 1965, pp 100-113.
3. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2001.
4. World Health Organization. International Classification ofImpair- ments, Disabilities and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to Consequences of Diseases. World Health Organization: Geneva, 1980.
5. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of longterm rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 519-526.
6. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Post M, Asano M. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005; 29: 147-156.
7. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210-216.
8. Carr AJ, Thompson PW. Towards a measure of patient-perceived handicap in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1994; 33: 378-382.
9. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 577-587.
10. Reinhardt JD, Stucki G. Rheumatoid arthritis and participation-the social animal revisited. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1214-1216.
11. Messick S. Validty of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performance as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol 1995; 50: 741-749.
12. Streiner DL, Norman GR. 'Precision' and 'accuracy': two terms that are neither. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 327-330.
13. Miller WC, Curt A, Elliott S, Hsieh JTC, Mortenson WB, Noonan VK et al. Outcome measures. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Aubut J et al. (eds). Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. ICORD: Vancouver, BC, 2006, chapter 22, pp 1-89.
14. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). ICF Australian User Guide. Version 1.0. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra, 2003.
15. Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT et al. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord 2007; 45: 275-291.
16. Post MW, de BA, de WL, Schrijvers A. The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 440-445.
17. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: S15-S20.
18. Tasiemski T, Kennedy P, Gardner BP, Blaikley RA. Athletic identity and sports participation in people with spinal cord injury. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2004; 21: 364-378.
19. Murphy G, McDonald L, McDonald S. Test re-test reliability of information about employment provided in surveys by people with spinal cord injuries. Psychol Rep 1997; 81: 25-26.
20. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion SA, St-Michel G. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res 1998; 21: 127-141.
21. Kielhofner G, Henry AD. Development and investigation of the occupational performance history interview. Am J Occup Ther 1988; 42: 489-498.
22. Ginis KA, Latimer AE, Hicks AL, Craven BC. Development and evaluation of an activity measure for people with spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 1099-1111.
23. Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, Marchand B, Spitzer WO. Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 583-590.
24. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 411-419.
25. Whiteneck GG, Brooks CA, Charlifue S, Gerhart KA, Mellick D, Overholser JD et al Guide for use ofthe Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Craig Hospital: Englewood, CO, 1998.
26. Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD, White B, Mehta R, George S. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 793-803.
27. Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Krause JS. The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998; 4: 16-30.
28. Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol 2007; 46: 1-18.
29. Walker N, Mellick D, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. Measuring participation across impairment groups using the Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 936-941.
30. Tozato F, Tobimatsu Y, Wang CW, Iwaya T, Kumamoto K, Ushiyama T. Reliability and validity of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique for Japanese individuals with spinal cord injury. Tohoku J Exp Med 2005; 205: 357-366.
31. Cusick CP, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. The use of proxies in community integration research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1018-1024.
32. Lund ML, Fisher AG, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 156-162.
33. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C. The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation. Technol Disabil 2002; 14: 113-118.
34. Dumont C, Bertrand R, Fougeyrollas P, Gervais M. Rasch modeling and the measurement of social participation. J Appl Meas 2003; 4: 309-325.
35. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Labbe A, Laramee MT. Comparison of 2 measurement tools assessing the concept of handicap: CHART and LIFE-H. J Spinal Cord Med 1998; 21: 192.
36. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 170-180.
37. Lynch KB, Bridle MJ. Construct validity of the Occupational Performance Interview. Occup Ther J Res 1993; 13: 231-240.
38. Latimer AE, Ginis KA, Craven BC, Hicks AL. The physical activity recall assessment for people with spinal cord injury: validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 208-216.
39. May LA, Warren S. Measuring quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury: external and structural validity. Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 341-350.
40. Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. In: MJ Field, AM Jette, L Martin (eds). Workshop on Disability in America: A New Look. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2006, pp 50-66.
41. Nordenfelt L. Action theory, disability and ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 1075-1079.
42. Jette AM, Tao W, Haley SM. Blending activity and participation sub-domains of the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1742-1750.
43. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. JRehabil Med 2002; 34: 205-210.
44. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 212-218.
45. Dijkers MPJM, Yavuzer G, Ergin S, Weitzenkamp D, Whiteneck GG. A tale of two countries: Environmental impacts on social participation after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40: 351-362.
46. Fuhrer MJ. Subjective well-being: implications for medical rehabilitation outcomes and models of disablement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73: 358-364.
47. Magasi SR, Heinemann AW, Whiteneck GG. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31: 145-156.
48. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation Survey/Mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 189-197.
49. Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 459-481.
50. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware Jr JE. Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 86: 57-71.
51. Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, Roberts P, Burgos L, Martinkewiz P et al. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1043-1051.
52. Pallant JF, Misajon R, Bennett E, Manderson L. Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual's perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 36.
53. Sandstrom M, Lundin-Olsson L. Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 833-845.
54. Van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS et al. The Participation Scale: Measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 193-203.
55. Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft PR. The Keele Assessment of Participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1889-1899.