From the 2006 NIDRR SCI measures meeting participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for research

Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 145-156

  Magasi, Susan R ^a,e   Heinemann, Allen W ^b,c   Whiteneck, Gale G ^d  

^a Center for Outcomes Research and Education   (United States)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CRAIG HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e EVANSTON NORTHWESTERN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; International classification of function; Measurement, instruments; Outcome measures; Participation; Quality of life; Rehabilitation research; Spinal cord injuries

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT OF LIFE HABITS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTENT VALIDITY; CRAIG HANDICAP ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING TECHNIQUE; DISABILITY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; ILLNESS BEHAVIOR; IMPACT ON PARTICIPATION AND AUTONOMY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF IMPAIRMENTS, DISABILITIES AND HANDICAPS; INTERVIEW; LANGUAGE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SPINAL CORD INJURY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABLED PERSON; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 46749083483     PISSN: 10790268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2008.11760705     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. Donovan WH. Donald Munro Lecture: spinal cord injury -past, present, and future. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(2): 85-100.
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability & Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
3. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Disability in America. Washington, DC: IOM; 2007.
4. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Long-range plan for fiscal years 2005-2009. Available at: http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ FedRegister/other/2006-1/021506d.html. Accessed August 20, 2007.
5. US Department of Justice. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 42 USC § 12101 (1990). Available at: http://www.ada.gov/ pubs/ada.html. Accessed August 20, 2007.
6. US Department of Health and Human Services. The New Freedom Initiative 2001. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/newfreedom/init.html. Accessed August 20, 2007.
7. Whiteneck GG. Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. In: Field MJ, Jette AM, Martin L, eds. Workshop on Disability in America: A New Look - Summary and Background Papers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006:50-66.
8. Ustun T, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:565-571.
9. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairment, Disability and Handicap. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999.
10. Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, EI-Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(suppl 2):S63-S80.
11. Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord. 2006;44: 95-105.
12. Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, Backman CL. Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:427-433.
13. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury: facts and figures at a glance. June 2006. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30:539-540.
14. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil. 2000(22):1783-1803.
15. Kennedy P, Rogers BA. Reported quality of life of people with spinal cord injuries: a longitudinal analysis of the first 6 months post-discharge. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:498-503.
16. Johnson RL, Gerhart KA, McCray J, Menconi JC, Whiteneck GG. Secondary conditions following spinal cord injury in a population-based sample. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:617-630.
17. Cox RJ, Amsters Dl, Pershouse KJ. The need for a multidisciplinary outreach service for people with spinal cord injury living in the community. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15: 600-606.
18. Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate D, Bushnik T, Forcheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1793-1803.
19. Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:829-840.
20. Johnston MV, Graves DE. Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with applications to spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31.
21. Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objects, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19(6):459-481.
22. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overhosler JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519-526.
23. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25(11-12):577-587.
24. Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, et al. Preliminary results for the PRO-PAR: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1043-1051.
25. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion SA, St-Michel G. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21(2):127-141.
26. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C. The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:113-118.
27. Dumont C, Bertrand R, Fougeyrollas P, Gervais M. Rasch modeling and the measurement of social participation. J Appl Meas. 2003;4:309-325.
28. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:411-419.
29. Dijkers M. Scoring CHART: survey and sensitivity analysis. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1991;14:85-86.
30. Segal ME, Schall RR. Assessing handicap of stroke survivors. A validation study of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74: 276-286.
31. Cusick CP, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. Use of proxies in community integration research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1018-1024.
32. Whiteneck G, Charlifue S, Gerhart K, Mellick D, Overholser J, Richardson G. Guide for Use of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique 2001. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital; 2001.
33. Tozato F, Tobimatsu Y, Wang CW, Iwaya T, Kumamoto K, Ushiyama T. Reliability and validity of the Craig handicap assessment and reporting technique for Japanese individuals with spinal cord injury. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005; 205(4):357-366.
34. Walker N, Mellick D, Brooks C, Whiteneck D. Measuring participation across impairment groups using the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Am J Med Rehabil. 2003;82(12):936-941.
35. Menter RR, Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, et al. Impairment, disability, handicap and medical expenses of persons aging with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1991;29(9):613-619.
36. Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Krause JS. The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1998;4(1):16-30.
37. Cardol M, Brandsma JW, de Groot IJ, van den Bos GA, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA. Handicap questionnaires: what do they assess? Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(3):97-105.
38. Vazirinejad R, Lilley JM, Ward CD. The 'Impact on Participation and Autonomy': acceptability of the English version in a multiple sclerosis outpatient setting. Mult Scler. 2003;9:612-615.
39. Larsonn Lund M, Nordlund A, Nygård L, Lexell J, Bernspång B. Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:3-8.
40. Lund ML, Fisher AG, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(2):156-162.
41. Cardol M, de Haan R), de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 ;82:210-216.
42. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:411-419.
43. Cardol M, Beelen A, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ, de Haan RJ. Responsiveness of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1524-1529.
44. Cardol M, de Jong BA, van den Bos GAM, Beelen A, de Groot Ij, de Haan RJ. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:27-35.
45. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Labbé A, Laramée MT. Comparison of 2 measurement tools addressing the concept of handicap: CHART and LIFE-H. [abstract], J Spinal Cord Med. 1998;21(2):192.
46. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Ace (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 86(1):57-71.
47. Gray DB, Hollinsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87: 189-197.
48. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. In press.
49. Gray DB, Hendershot GE. Applying outcomes research to disability and health. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(suppl 2):S10-S14.
50. Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26(3):287-305.
51. Lord FM. Application of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1980.
52. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1968.
53. McHorney CA. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. Ann Rev Health. 1999;20:309-335.
54. Heinemann AW. Putting outcome measurement in context: a rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;51:6-14.
55. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal: measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:857-860.
56. Wright BD, Stone MH. Making Measures. Chicago, IL: Phaneron Press; 2004.
57. Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Guglielmi V, Picco D. Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire in people with Parkinson's disease. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43:451-461.