Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): A model fruit-bearing crop

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Volumn 3, Issue 11, 2008, Pages

  Kimura, Seisuke ^a   Sinha, Neelima ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951297206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15596095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.emo105     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arumuganathan K., Earle E. 1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9: 208-218.
2. Atherton J.G., Harris G.P. 1986. Flowering. In The tomato crop: A scientific basis for improvement (ed. J.G. Atherton, J. Rudich), pp. 167-200. Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Barton D.W., Butler L., Jenkins J.A., Rick C.M., Young P.A. 1955. Rules for nomenclature in tomato genetics. J. Hered. 46: 22-26.[Free Full Text]
4. Bernacchi D., Tanksley S.D. 1997. An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum: Linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147: 861-877.[Medline]
5. Bohs L., Olmstead R.G. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ndhF sequences. Syst. Bot. 22: 5-17.
6. Chen J.J., Janssen B.J., Williams A., Sinha N. 1997. A gene fusion at a homeobox locus: Alterations in leaf shape and implications for morphological evolution. Plant Cell 9: 1289-1304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Child A. 1990. A synopsis of Solanum subgenus Potatoe (G. Don) (D'Arcy) (Tuberarium (Dun.) Bitter (s. l). Feddes Repert. 101: 209-235.
8. Darwin S., Knapp S., Peralta I. 2003. Taxonomy of tomatoes in the Galapagos Islands: Native and introduced species of Solanum section Lycopersicon (Solanaceae). Syst. Biodivers. 1: 29-53.
9. Doebley J.F., Gaut B.S., Smith B.D. 2006. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127: 1309-1321.[Medline]
10. Doganlar S., Frary A., Ku H.M., Tanksley S.D. 2002. Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome 45: 1189-1202.[Medline]
11. Eshed Y., Zamir D. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.[Medline]
12. Frary A., Nesbitt T.C., Grandillo S., Knaap E., Cong B., Liu J., Meller J., Elber R., Alpert K.B., Tanksley S.D. 2000. fw2.2: A quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Frary A., Fritz L.A., Tanksley S.D. 2004. A comparative study of the genetic bases of natural variation in tomato leaf, sepal, and petal morphology. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 523-533.[Medline]
14. Fray R.G., Grierson D. 1993. Identification and genetic analysis of normal and mutant phytoene synthase genes of tomato by sequencing, complementation and co-suppression. Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 589-602.[Medline]
15. Fridman E., Carrari F., Liu Y.S., Fernie A.R., Zamir D. 2004. Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science 305: 1786-1789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Haanstra J.P.W., Wye C., Verbakel H., Meijer-Dekens F., van den Berg P., Odinot P., van Heusden A.W., Tanksley S.D., Lindhout P., Peleman J. 1999. An integrated high-density RFLP-AFLP map of tomato based on two Lycopersicon esculentum x L. pennellii populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 254-271.
17. Holtan H.E., Hake S. 2003. Quantitative trait locus analysis of leaf dissection in tomato using Lycopersicon pennellii segmental introgression lines. Genetics 165: 1541-1550.[Medline]
18. Isaacson T., Ronen G., Zamir D., Hirschberg J. 2002. Cloning of tangerine from tomato reveals a carotenoid isomerase essential for the production of β-carotene and xanthophylls in plants. Plant Cell 14: 333-342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Kimura S., Sinha N. 2008a. How to grow tomatoes. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. (this issue). doi: 10.1101/pdb. prot5081.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Kimura S., Sinha N. 2008b. Crossing tomato plants. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. (this issue). doi: 10.1101/pdb. prot5082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Kimura S., Sinha N. 2008c. Grafting tomato plants. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. (this issue). doi: 10.1101/pdb. prot5083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Kimura S., Sinha N. 2008d. Tomato transformation. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. (this issue). doi: 10.1101/pdb. prot5084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Kimura S., Koenig D., Kang J., Yoong F.Y., Sinha N. 2008. Natural variation of leaf morphology results from mutation of a novel KNOX gene. Curr. Biol. 18: 672-677.[Medline]
24. Knapp S., Bohs L., Nee M., Spooner D.M. 2005. Solanaceae--A model for linking genomics with biodiversity. Comp. Funct. Genomics 5: 285-291.
25. Linnaeus C. 1753. Species plantarum. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholm.
26. Lippman Z.B., Semel Y., Zamir D. 2007. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17: 545-552.[Medline]
27. Liu J., Van Eck J., Cong B., Tanksley S.D. 2002. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 13302-13306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Meissner R., Jacobson Y., Melamed S., Levyatuv S., Shalev G., Ashri A., Elkind Y., Levy A. 1997. A new model system for tomato genetics. Plant J. 12: 1465-1472.
29. Menda N., Semel Y., Peled D., Eshed Y., Zamir D. 2004. In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. Plant J. 38: 861-872.[Medline]
30. Miller P. 1754. The gardener's dictionary. C. Rivington, London.
31. Mueller L.A., Solow T.H., Taylor N., Skwarecki B., Buels R., Binns J., Lin C., Wright M.H., Ahrens R., Wang Y. et al. 2005. The SOL Genomics Network: A comparative resource for Solanaceae biology and beyond. Plant Physiol. 138: 1310-1317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Ori N., Cohen A.R., Etzioni A., Brand A., Yanai O., Shleizer S., Menda N., Amsellem Z., Efroni I., Pekker I. et al. 2007. Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato. Nat. Genet. 39: 787-791.[Medline]
33. Paran I., van der Knaap E. 2007. Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 3841-3852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Parnis A., Cohen O., Gutfinger T., Hareven D., Zamir D., Lifschitz E. 1997. The dominant developmental mutants of tomato, Mouse-ear and Curl, are associated with distinct modes of abnormal transcriptional regulation of a Knotted gene. Plant Cell 9: 2143-2158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Peralta I., Knapp S., Spooner D. 2005. New species of wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon: Solanaceae) from northern Peru. Syst. Bot. 30: 424-434.
36. Pnueli L., Carmel-Goren L., Hareven D., Gutfinger T., Alvarez J., Ganal M., Zamir D., Lifschitz E. 1998. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125: 1979-1989.[Abstract]
37. Rick C. 1980. Petroselinum (Pts), a new marker for chromosome 6. Tomato Genet. Coop. Rep. 20: 32.
38. Rick C.M. 1991a. Tomato paste: A concentrated review of genetic highlights from the beginnings to the advent of molecular genetics. Genetics 128: 1-5.[Medline]
39. Rick C.M. 1991b. Tomato. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, England.
40. Ronen G., Cohen M., Zamir D., Hirschberg J. 1999. Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit development: Expression of the gene for lycopene epsiloncyclase is down-regulated during ripening and is elevated in the mutant Delta. Plant J. 17: 341-351.[Medline]
41. Ronen G., Carmel-Goren L., Zamir D., Hirschberg J. 2000. An alternative pathway to β-carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of Beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 11102-11107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Schmitz G., Theres K. 1999. Genetic control of branching in Arabidopsis and tomato. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2: 51-55.[Medline]
43. Sinha N. 1999. Leaf development in angiosperms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 419-446.
44. Spooner D.M., Anderson G.J., Jansen R.K. 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes and pepinos (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 676-688.
45. Spooner D.M., Peralta I.E., Knapp S. 2005. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. TAXON 54: 43-61.
46. Stevens M.A., Rick C.M. 1986. Genetics and breeding. In The tomato crop (ed. J.G. Atherton, J. Rudich), pp. 35-109. Chapman and Hall, New York/London.
47. Tanksley S.D. 2004. The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 16: suppl: S181-S189.[Free Full Text]
48. Wang Y., Tang X., Cheng Z., Mueller L., Giovannoni J., Tanksley S.D. 2006. Euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin: Comparative composition in the tomato genome. Genetics 172: 2529-2540.[Medline]
49. Xiao H., Jiang N., Schaffner E., Stockinger E.J., van der Knaap E. 2008. A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319: 1527-1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Zhang J., Chen R., Xiao J., Qian C., Wang T., Li H., Ouyang B., Ye Z. 2007. A single-base deletion mutation in SlIAA9 gene causes tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) entire mutant. J. Plant Res. 120: 671-678.[Medline]