Strategic use of multiple texts for the evaluation of arguments

Reading Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 121-149

  Kobayashi, Keiichi ^a  

^a SHIZUOKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951276809     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710902754192     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Effects of personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts. Reading Psychology, 27, 457-484.
2. Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000). Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 573-604.
3. Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485-522.
4. Britt, M. A., & Gabrys, G. (2002). Implications of document-level literacy skills for Web site design. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 170-176.
5. Britt, M. A., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macrostructure focusing tasks. Reading Psychology, 25, 313-339.
6. Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000). When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1151-1164.
7. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5-24.
8. Fleming, D. B., & Weber, L. J. (1980). Recognizing point of view: A critical reading skill in the social studies. Social Education, 44, 153-156.
9. Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B., & Porat, D. (2008). Living and dormant collective memories as contexts of history learning. Learning and Instruction, 18, 223-237.
10. Hovland, C. I. (Ed.). (1957). The order of presentation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Kamota, T. (2005). Samâtaimu wa kigyou-syakai ni saigennonai tyoujikan-roudou wo motarasu dake dearu [Daylight saving time will unlimitedly promote longer working time in Japanese companies]. In Bungeishunju (Ed.), Nihon no ronten 2006 [Controversial issues in Japan, 2006] (pp. 374-377). Tokyo: Bungeishunju.
12. Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260-271.
13. Kobayashi, K. (2009a). Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: Effects of external strategy use. Instructional Science.
14. Kobayashi, K. (2009b). The influence of topic knowledge, external strategy use, and college experience on students' comprehension of controversial texts. Learning and Individual Differences.
15. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
16. Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1243.
17. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
18. MacCoun, R. J. (1998). Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 259-287.
19. Miller, A. G., McHoskey, J. W., Bane, C. M., & Dowd, T. G. (1993). The attitude polarization phenomenon: Role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 561-574.
20. Munro, G. D., & Ditto, P. H. (1997). Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotyped-relevant scientific information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 636-653.
21. Munro, G. D., Leafy, S. P., & Lasane, T. P. (2004). Between a rock and a hard place: Biased assimilation of scientific information in the face of commitment. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 431-444.
22. Murakoshi, C. (2006). Samâtaimu to syoueneruĝ-kouka [Summer time and energy saving effect]. ENERGY, 7, 27-29.
23. Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482-488.
24. Nash, J. G., Schumacher, G. M., & Carlson, B. W. (1993). Writing from sources: A structure-mapping model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 159-170.
25. Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Georgi, M. C. (1999). Towards a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 337-355). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Holt, K. (1985). Maintaining consistency between self-serving beliefs and available data: A bias in information evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 179-190.
27. Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85-106.
28. Rukavina, I., & Danenman, M. (1996). Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 272-287.
29. Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-456.
30. Wineburg, S. S. (1991a). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
31. Wineburg, S. S. (1991b). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28,495-519.
32. Wolfe, J. (2002). Marginal pedagogy: How annotated texts affect a writing-from-sources task. Written Communication, 19, 297-333.
33. Zerbe, M. J. (2007). Composition and the rhetoric of science: Engaging the dominant discourse. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
34. Zuwerink, J. R., & Devine, P. G. (1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.