Genie capture, sex linkage, and the heritability of fitness

American Naturalist

Volumn 175, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 564-576

  Connallon, Tim ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Antagonism; Female choice; Good genes; Sex chromosomes; Sexual; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; CHROMOSOME; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GOOD GENES HYPOTHESIS; HERITABILITY; MATE CHOICE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENETICS; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SEX DETERMINATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; MATE CHOICE; SEX CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHROMOSOMES;

EID: 77951062029     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/651590     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Albert, A. Y. K., and S. P. Otto. 2005. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism. Science 310:119-121.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Baer, C. F., M. M. Miyamoto, and D. Denver. 2007. Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences. Nature Reviews Genetics 8:619-631.
4. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
5. Berglund, A., A. BisazzaA. Pilastra. 1996. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58:385-399. (Pubitemid 26368427)
6. Boake, C. R. B. 1985. Genetic consequences of mate choice: a quantitative genetic method for testing sexual selection theory. Science 227:1061-1063.
7. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology 8c Evolution 24:280-288.
8. Borgia, G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Pages 19-80 in M. Blum and A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition. Academic Press, New York.
9. Brommer, J. E., M. Kirkpatrick, A. Qvarnström, and L. Gustafsson. 2007. The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implications for sexual selection. PLoS ONE 2:e744.
10. Bull, J. J. 1983. Evolution of sex determining mechanisms. Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
11. Candolin, U., and J. Heuschele. 2008. Is sexual selection beneficial during adaptation to environmental change? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:446-452.
12. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genetical Research 74:329-340.
13. Charlesworth, B., J. A. Coyne, and N. H. Barton. 1987. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. American Naturalist 130:113-146.
14. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle, and M. W Blows. 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. American Naturalist 171:22-34.
15. Chippindale, A. K., and W. R. Rice. 2001. Y chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:5677-5682.
16. Chippindale, A. K., J. R. Gibson, and W. R. Rice. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:1671-1675.
17. Clark, A. G. ?. Natural selection and Y-linked polymorphism. Genetics 115:569-577.
18. Clark, A. G., D. J. Begun, and T. Prout. 1999. Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283:217-220.
19. Connallon, T., and E. Jakubowski. 2009. Association between sex ratio distortion and sexually antagonistic fitness consequences of female choice. Evolution 63:2179-2183.
20. Cowley, D. E., and W. R. Atchley. 1988. Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Heritabilities and genetic correlations between sexes for head and thorax traits. Genetics 119:421-433.
21. Cox, R. M., and R. Cdsbeek. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. American Naturalist 173:176-187.
22. Devlin, R. H., and Y. Nagahama. 2002. Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmentd. influences. Aquaculture 208:191-364.
23. Ellegren, H. 2007. Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274:1-10. (Pubitemid 47055489)
24. Ellegren, H.J. Parsch. 2007. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 8:689698. (Pubitemid 47281991)
25. Fairbairn, D. J., and D. A. Roff. 2006. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism: assessing the importance of sex-linkage. Heredity 97:319-328.
26. Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau. 2004. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429:65-67.
27. Fisher, R. A. 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review 7:184-192.
28. Fitzpatrick, M. J. 2004. Pleiotropy and the genomic location of sexually selected genes. American Naturalist 163:800-808.
29. Foerster, K., T. Coulson, B. C. Sheldon, J. M. Pemberton, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and L. E. B. Kruuk. 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447:1107-1110. (Pubitemid 47014431)
30. Forsman, A.M. Hagman. 2006. Calling is an honest indicator of paternal genetic qudity in poison frogs. Evolution 60:21482157. (Pubitemid 44808224)
31. Fry, J. D. 2009. The genomic location of sexual antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution, doi:10.1111/j/15585646.2009.00898.x.
32. Gibson, J. R., A. K. Chippindale, and W. R. Rice. 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:499-505.
33. Gillespie, J. 2004. Population genetics: a concise guide. 2nd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
34. Haag-Liautard, C., M. Dorris, X. Maside, S. Macaskill, D. L. Halligan, B. CharlesworthP. D. Keightley. 2007. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445:82-85. (Pubitemid 46067305)
35. Haldane, J. B. S. 1937. The effect of variation on fitness. American Naturalist 71:337-349.
36. Hastings, I. M. 1994. Manifestations of sexual selection may depend on the genetic basis of sex determination. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 258:83-87.
37. Head, M. L., J. Hunt, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biology 3:e33.
38. Hedrick, P. W. 2007. Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift. Evolution 61:2750-2771.
39. Hedrick, P. W., and J. D. Parker. 1997. Evolutionary genetics and genetic variation of haplodiploids and X-linked genes. Annud Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:55-83.
40. Hollis, B., J. L. Fierst, and D. Houle. 2009. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 63:324-333.
41. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
42. Houle, D., B. Morikawa, and M. Lynch. 1996. Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143:1467-1483.
43. James, T. W. 1973. Covariances between relatives due to sex-linked, genes. Biometrics 29:584-588.
44. Jennions, M. D., A. P. MollerM. Petrie. 2001. Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Quarterly Review of Biology 76:3-36. (Pubitemid 32235227)
45. Jones, T. M., R. J. Quinnell, and A. Balmford. 1998. Fisherian flies: benefits of femde choice in a lekking sandfly. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265:1651-1657.
46. Kidwell, J. F., M. T. Clegg, F. M. Stewart, and T. Prout. 1977. Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in two sexes under random mating. Genetics 85:171-183.
47. Kirkpatrick, M. 2009. Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions. Genetica 136:271-284.
48. Kirkpatrick, M., and D. W. Hall. 2004. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58:683-691.
49. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M. Jennions, and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:653-664. (Pubitemid 36359742)
50. Kotiaho, J. S., and M. Puurtinen. 2007. Mate choice for indirect genetic benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm. Functional Ecology 21:638-644. (Pubitemid 47052341)
51. Kruuk, L. E. B., J. Slate, and A. J. Wilson. 2008. New answers to old questions: the evolutionary quantitative genetics of wild animal populations. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39:525-548.
52. Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New York.
53. Long, T. A. F., and W. R. Rice. 2007. Adult locomotory activity mediates intrdocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274:3105-3112.
54. Lynch, M., and J. B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
55. Mackay, T. F. C. 2001. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annud Review of Genetics 35:303-339.
56. Mank, J. E. 2009a. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: lessons from the genome. American Naturdist 173: 141-150.
57. - 2009b. The W, X, Y and Z of sex-chromosome dosage compensation. Trends in Genetics 25:226-233.
58. Mank, J. E., D. W Hall, M. Kirkpatrick, and J. C. Avise. 2006. Sex chromosomes and male ornaments: a comparative evaluation in ray-finned fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:233-236. (Pubitemid 46768097)
59. Mitchell-Olds, T., J. H. Willis, and D. B. Goldstein. 2007. Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nature Reviews Genetics 8:845-856.
60. Møller, A. P., and R. V. Alatalo. 1999. Good, genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royd Society B: Biological Sciences 266:85-91.
61. Morrow, E. H., A. D. Stewart, and W. R. Rice. 2008. Assessing the extent of genome-wide intralocus sexual conflict via experimentally enforced gender-limited selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:1046-1054.
62. Neff, B. D., and T. E. Pitcher. 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology 14:19-38.
63. Oneal, E., T. Connallon, and L. L. Knowles. 2007. Conflict between direct and indirect benefits of female choice in desert Drosophila. Biology Letters 3:29-32.
64. Organ, L., and D. E. Janes. 2008. Evolution of sex chromosomes in Sauropsida. Integrative and Comparative Biology 48:512-519.
65. Pamilo, P. 1979. Genetic variation at sex-linked loci: quantification of regular selection models. Hereditas 91:129-133. (Pubitemid 10235778)
66. Partridge, L. 1980. Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies. Nature 283:290-291.
67. Patten, M. M., and D. Haig. 2009. Maintenance or loss of genetic variation under sexual and parental, antagonism at a sex-linked locus. Evolution 63:2888-2895.
68. Petrie, M. 1994. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371:598-599. (Pubitemid 24315738)
69. Pischedda, A., and A. K. Chippindale. 2006. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PLoS Biology 4:20992103. (Pubitemid 44760023)
70. Pitnick, S. 1991. Male size influences mate fecundity and remating interval in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 41:735-745.
71. Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Møller. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 26:21-29.
72. Presgraves, D. C. 2008. Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila. Trends in Genetics 24:336-343.
73. Presgraves, D. C, and H. A. Orr. 1998. Haldane's rule in taxa lacking a hemizygous X. Science 282:952-954.
74. Prout, T. 1999. How well does opposing selection maintain variation? Pages 157-181 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
75. Qvarnström, A., J. E. Brommer, and L. Gustafsson. 2006. Testing the genetics underlying the coevolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441:84-86. (Pubitemid 43827955)
76. Reeve, H. K., and D. W. Pfennig. 2003. Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especidly conducive to sexual selection? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100:1089-1094.
77. Reinhold, K. 1998. Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 44:1-7. (Pubitemid 28514639)
78. Reynolds, J. D., and M. R. Gross. 1992. Femde mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 250:57-62.
79. Rice, W R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742. (Pubitemid 16277746)
80. - 1988. Heritable variation, in fitness as a prerequisite for adaptive female choice: the effect of mutation-selection balance. Evolution 42:817-820.
81. Rowe, L.D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition-dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:1416-1421. (Pubitemid 27178059)
82. Rosenthal, R. 1994. Parametric measures of effect size. Pages 231-244 in H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges, eds. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
83. Rundle, H. D., A. Odeen, and A. O. Mooers. 2007. An experimental test for indirect benefits in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7:e36.
84. Schaeffer, S. W., C. J. Brown, and W. W. Andersson. 1984. Does mate choice affect fitness? Genetics 107:s94.
85. Shabalina, S. A., L. Yu, and A. S. Kondrashov. 1997. Rapid dedine of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94:13034-13039.
86. Solari, A. J. 1994. Sex chromosomes and sex determination in vertebrates. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
87. Taylor, C. E., A. D. Pereda, and J. A. Ferrari. 1987. On the correlation between mating success and offspring quality in Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturdist 129:721-729.
88. Taylor, M. L., N. Wedell, and D. J. Hosken. 2007. The heritability of attractiveness. Current Biology 17:R959-R960.
89. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 136-179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Aldine, Chicago.
90. Wayne, M. L., M. Tdonis-Scott, L. M. Bono, L. Harshman, A. Kopp, S. V. Nuzhdin, and L. M. McIntyre. 2007. Simpler mode of inheritance of transcriptional variation in male Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104:18577-18582.
91. Wedell, N., and T. Tregenza. 1999. Successful fathers sire successful sons. Evolution 53:620-625.
92. White, M. J. D. 1973. Animal cytology and evolution. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
93. Whitlock, M. C., and A. F. Agrawal. 2009. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load, through selection in males. Evolution 63:569-582.
94. Wilkinson, G. S.P. R. Reillo. 1994. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biologicd Sciences 255:1-6. (Pubitemid 24044165)
95. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
96. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection-selection for a handicap. Journd of Theoretical Biology 53:205-214.
97. - 1977. Cost of honesty: further remarks on the handicap principle. Journd of Theoreticd Biology 67:603-605.
98. Zeh, J. A., and D. W Zeh. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royd Society B: Biologicd Sciences 263:1711-1717. (Pubitemid 27055566)