Doped graphene as tunable electron?phonon coupling material

Nano Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1172-1176

  Attaccalite, Claudio ^a,b   Wirtz, Ludger ^c   Lazzeri, Michele ^d   Mauri, Francesco ^d   Rubio, Angel ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c INSTITUT D ELECTRONIQUE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^e FRITZ HABER INSTITUT DER MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electron phonon coupling; Graphene; Raman spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

D LINES; DEFORMATION POTENTIAL; DOPING DEPENDENCE; DOPING LEVELS; ELECTRON PHONON COUPLINGS; ELECTRON-PHONON COUPLING; ELECTRONIC DEVICE; EXTERNAL CONTROL; HIGH-SYMMETRY POINTS; LASER ENERGIES; MEAN FIELD APPROACH; PHONON COUPLING;

DOPING (ADDITIVES); ELECTRON CORRELATIONS; ELECTRON-PHONON INTERACTIONS; GRAPHENE; GRAPHITE; RAMAN SCATTERING; RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY;

ELECTRONS;

GRAPHITE; NANOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRON; INSTRUMENTATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; VIBRATION;

ELECTRONS; GRAPHITE; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; VIBRATION;

EID: 77951044900     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: 15306992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl9034626     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Castro Neto, A. H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N. M. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109
2. Tsang Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 725
3. Yao, Z. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 2941
4. Javey, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 106804
5. Lazzeri, M.; Piscanec, S.; Mauri, F.; Ferrari, A. C.; Robertson, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 236802
6. LeRoy, B. J.; Lemay, S. G.; Kong, J.; Dekker, C. Nature (London) 2004, 432, 371
7. Barreiro, A.; Lazzeri, M.; Moser, J.; Mauri, F.; Bachtold, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103 076601
8. Kuzmenko, A. B.; Benfatto, L.; Cappelluti, E.; Crassee, I.; van der Marel, D.; Blake, P.; Novoselov, K. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 116804
9. Grüneis, A.; Attaccalite, C.; Rubio, A.; Vyalikh, D. V.; Molodtsov, S. L.; Fink, J.; Follath, R.; Eberhardt, W.; Büchner, B.; Pichler, T. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 205106
10. Grüneis, A.; Serrano, J.; Bosak, A.; Lazzeri, M.; Molodtsov, S. L.; Wirtz, L.; Attaccalite, C.; Krisch, M.; Rubio, A.; Mauri, F.; Pichler, T. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80 085423
11. Li, Guohong; Luican, Adina; Andrei, Eva Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 176804
12. Das, A. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 210
13. Das, A. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 155417
14. Ferrari, A. C.; Meyer, J. C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K. S.; Roth, S.; Geim, A. K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401
15. Graf, D.; Molitor, F.; Ensslin, K.; Stampfer, C.; Jungen, A.; Hierold, C.; Wirtz, L. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 238
16. Pisana, S.; Lazzeri, M.; Casiraghi, C.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Ferrari, A. C.; Mauri, F. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 198
17. Yan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, P.; Pinczuk, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 166802
18. Casiraghi, C.; Pisana, S.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Ferrari, A. C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 233108
19. Stampfer, C.; Molitor, F.; Graf, D.; Ensslin, K.; Jungen, A.; Hierold, C.; Wirtz, L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 241907
20. Basko, D. M.; Piscanec, S.; Ferrari, A. C. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 165413
21. Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 266407
22. Casiraghi, C.; Hartschuh, A.; Qian, H.; Piscanec, S.; Georgi, C.; Novoselov, K. S.; Basko, D. M.; Ferrari, A. C. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1433
23. Matteo, Calandra; Francesco, Mauri Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 205411
24. Thomsen, C.; Reich, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 5214
25. 2).
26. Piscanec, S.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Ferrari, A. C.; Robertson, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 185503
27. Ishikawa, K.; Ando, T. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 75 084713
28. Saha, S. K.; Waghmare, U. V.; Krishnamurthy, H. R.; Sood, A. K. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 201404
29. Tse, W. K.; Das Sarma, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 236802
30. Lazzeri, M.; Attaccalite, C.; Wirtz, L.; Mauri, F. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78 081406(R)
31. Basko, D. M.; Aleiner, I. L. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77 041409(R)
32. Grüneis, A.; Attaccalite, C.; Rubio, A.; Vyalikh, D. V.; Molodtsov, S. L.; Fink, J.; Follath, R.; Eberhardt, W.; Büchner, B.; Pichler, T. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80 075431
33. In all DFT calculations the distance between the graphene planes was 20 a.u., the Brillouin zone integration was performed using an uniform k-point grid 36 - 36 - 1, with the functional of ref 47, plane waves (60 Ry cut-off) and pseudopotentials, (48) using the PWSCF code. (49) An electronic smearing of 0.02 Ry with the Fermi?Dirac distribution was employed.
34. Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 266407
35. Park, C. H.; Giustino, F.; Cohen, M. L.; Louie, S. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99 086804
36. Grüneis, A. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 205425
37. Non-self-consistent GW calculations have been performed starting from DFT-LDA wavefunctions, using a plasmon pole approximation, following the scheme of Hybertsen and Louie, (35) with the code YAMBO. (50) We use a 36 - 36 - 1 k-point grid for the primitive cell and an equivalent one for the supercell. Convergence in the number of bands and size of the dielectric constant has been carefully checked.
38. Hybertsen, M. S.; Louie, S. G. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 34, 5390
39. Zhou, S. Y. Nat. Phys. 2006, 2, 595-599
40. Grüneis, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100 037601
41. Notice that nonadiabatic corrections, not considered here, are though to be important for the G phonon but not for the K phonon, see ref 31.
42. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648
43. For the B3LYP calculat ions we used the code CRYSTAL (Saunders, V. R.; Dovesi, R.; Roetti, C.; Orlando, R.; Zicovich-Wilson, C. M.; Harrison, N. M.; Doll, K.; Civalleri, B.; Bush, I. J.; D'Arco, Ph.; Llunell, M. CRYSTAL03 User's Manual: University of Torino: Torino, 2003)
44. using the TZ basis by Dunning (without the diffuse P-function). K-point sampling and thermal smearing are the same as in the GW calculations.
45. Polini, M.; Asgari, R.; Barlas, Y.; Pereg-Barnea, T.; MacDonald, A. H. Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 58
46. Attaccalite, C.; Rubio, A. Phys. Status Solidi B 2009, 246, 2523
47. We suppose that is the case also in multilayer graphene, althougt the band structure is different from that graphene, a result similar to the one we found for graphen holds, as we found for graphite. (27)
48. Faugeras, C.; Amado, M.; Kossacki, P.; Orlita, M.; Sprinkle, M.; Berger, C.; de Heer, W. A.; Potemski, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 186803
49. Park, C. H.; Giustino, F.; Cohen, M. L.; Louie, S. G. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4229
50. Perebeinos, V.; Avouris, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101 057401
51. Ceperley, D. M.; Alder, B. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980, 45, 566
52. Troullier, N.; Martins, J. L. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993
53. Giannozzi, P. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 395502 (http://www.quantum-espresso.org)
54. Marini, A.; Hogan, C; Gruning, M.; Varsano, D. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009, 180, 1392 (http://www.yambo-code.org)