Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism

Anatomical Sciences Education

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 64-72

  Camp, Christopher L ^a   Gregory, Jeremy K ^a   Lachman, Nirusha ^a   Chen, Laura P ^a   Juskewitch, Justin E ^a   Pawlina, Wojciech ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Formative feedback; Gross anatomy; Group feedback; Individual feedback; Peer evaluation; Professionalism

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CURRICULUM; DISSECTION; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PEER GROUP; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEACHING;

ANATOMY; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; DISSECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PEER GROUP; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TEACHING;

EID: 77950933511     PISSN: 19359772     EISSN: 19359780     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ase.142     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ABIM. 1999.American Board of Internal Medicine. Professional Associate Ratings (PARs) Form. In: ABIM. Project Professionalism. 1st Ed. Philadelphia, PA: ABIM Communications. p 23-34.
2. ACGME. 1999. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Outcome Project. General Competencies: Minimum program requirements language. Chicago, IL. URL: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compMin.asp [accessed 6 January 2010].
3. Arnold EL, Blank LL, Race KE, Cipparrone N. 1998. Can professionalism be measured? The development of a scale for use in the medical environment. Acad Med 73: 1119-1121. (Pubitemid 28483865)
4. Arnold L, Shue CK, Kritt B, Ginsburg S, Stern DT. 2005. Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalism. J Gen Intern Med 20: 819-824. (Pubitemid 41725696)
5. Blackall GF, Shoop GH, George J, Lerner SM, Wilson PK, Pees RC, Kreher M. 2007. Professionalism in medical education: The development and validation of a survey instrument to assess attitudes toward professionalism. Med Teach 29: e58-e62. (Pubitemid 47272756)
6. Bryan RE, Krych AJ, Carmichael SW, Viggiano TR, Pawlina W. 2005. Assessing professionalism in early medical education: Experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course. Ann Acad Med Singapore 34: 486-491. (Pubitemid 41499726)
7. Chen DT, Mills AE, Werhane PH. 2008. Tools for tomorrow's health care system: A systems-informed mental model, moral imagination, and physicians' professionalism. Acad Med 83: 723-732.
8. Chen LP, Gregory JK, Camp CL, Juskewitch JE, Pawlina W, Lachman N. 2009. Learning to lead: Self- and peer evaluation of team leaders in the human structure didactic block. Anat Sci Educ 2: 210-217.
9. Christianson CE, McBride RB, Vari RC, Olson L, Wilson HD. 2007. From traditional to patient-centered learning: Curriculum change as an intervention for changing institutional culture and promoting professionalism in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med 82: 1079-1088. (Pubitemid 350035792)
10. Coulehan J, Williams PC. 2003. Conflicting professional values in medical education. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 12: 7-20. (Pubitemid 36877546)
11. Cruess SR, Cruess RL. 1997. Professionalism must be taught. BMJ 315:1674-1677.
12. Derstine PL. 2002. Implementing goals for non-cognitive outcomes within a basic science course. Acad Med 77: 931-932.
13. Elliott DD, May W, Schaff PB, Nyquist JG, Trial J, Reilly JM, Lattore P. 2009. Shaping professionalism in pre-clinical medical students: Professionalism and the practice of medicine. Med Teach 31: e295-e302.
14. Escobar-Poni B, Poni ES. 2006. The role of gross anatomy in promoting professionalism: A neglected opportunity! Clin Anat 19: 461-467. (Pubitemid 43883196)
15. Frohna A, Stern D. 2005. The nature of qualitative comments in evaluating professionalism. Med Educ 39: 763-768. (Pubitemid 41076147)
16. Google Docs. 2009. Google Inc. Mountain View, CA. URL: http://docs.google. com [Accessed 15 December 2009].
17. Gregory JK, Lachman N, Camp CL, Chen LP, Pawlina W. 2009. Restructuring a basic science course for core competencies: An example from anatomy teaching. Med Teach 31: 855-861.
18. Jones WS, Hanson JL, Longacre JL. 2004. An intentional modeling process to teach professional behavior: Students' clinical observations of preceptors. Teach Learn Med 16: 264-269.
19. Krych EH, Vande Voort JL. 2006. Medical students speak: A two-voice comment on learning professionalism in medicine. Clin Anat 19: 415-418.
20. Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2006. Integrating professionalism in early medical education: The theory and application of reflective practice in the anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat 19: 456-460. (Pubitemid 43883195)
21. Macpherson C, Kenny N. 2008. Professionalism and the basic sciences: An untapped resource. Med Educ 42: 183-188.
22. Mueller PS. 2009. Incorporating professionalism into medical education: The Mayo clinic experience. Keio J Med 58: 133-143.
23. Netterstrøm I, Kayser L. 2008. Learning to be a doctor while learning anatomy! Anat Sci Educ 1: 154-158.
24. Nofziger AC, Naumburg EH, Davis BJ, Mooney CJ, Epstein RM. 2010. Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: A qualitative study. Acad Med 85: 140-147.
25. Pangaro LN. 2006. A shared professional framework for anatomy and clinical clerkships. Clin Anat 19: 419-428.
26. Pangaro LN, McGaghie WC. 2005.Evaluation and grading of students. In: Fincher RME (Editor). Guidebook for Clerkship Directors. 3rd Ed. Omaha, NE: Alliance for Clinical Education. p 133-250. URL: http://familymed.uthscsa.edu/ ACE/guidebook.htm [Accessed 10 December 2009].
27. Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. 2004. Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 79: 244-249. (Pubitemid 38269455)
28. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT, Veloski JJ, Hodgson CS. 2005. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Eng J Med 353: 2673-2682. (Pubitemid 41817716)
29. Pawlina W. 2006. Professionalism and anatomy: How do these two terms define our role? Clin Anat 19: 391-392. (Pubitemid 43883186)
30. Pearson WG Jr, Hoagland TM. 2010. Measuring change in professionalism attitudes during the gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 3: 12-16.
31. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfor JP. 1993. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 269: 1655-1660. (Pubitemid 23093951)
32. Reed DA, West CP, Mueller PS, Ficalora RD, Engstler GJ, Beckman TJ. 2008. Behaviors of highly professional resident physicians. JAMA 300: 1326-1333.
33. Rosenstein AH, O'Daniel M. 2008. A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 34: 464-471.
34. Steinert Y, Cruess S, Cruess R, Snell L. 2005. Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: From programme design to curriculum change. Med Educ 39: 127-136 (Pubitemid 40278538)
35. Steinert Y, Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Fuks A. 2007. Faculty development as an instrument of change: A case study on teaching professionalism. Acad Med 82: 1057-1064. (Pubitemid 350035790)
36. Stern DT. 2006.A framework for measuring professionalism. In: Stern DT (Editor). Measuring Medical Professionalism. 1st Ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p 3-13.
37. Stern DT, Papadakis M. 2006. The developing physician-Becoming a professional. N Engl J Med 355: 1794-1799.
38. Swartz WJ. 2006. Using gross anatomy to teach and assess professionalism in the first year of medical school. Clin Anat 19: 437-441.
39. Swick HM. 2000. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med 75: 612-616.
40. Swick HM. 2006. Medical professionalism and the clinical anatomist. Clin Anat 19: 393-402.
41. Teherani A, Hodgson CS, Banach M, Papadakis MA. 2005. Domains of unprofessional behavior during medical school associated with future disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 80: S17-S20. (Pubitemid 41383267)
42. Weber DO. 2004. Poll results: Doctors' disruptive behavior disturbs physician leaders. Physician Exec 30: 6-14.