Access all areas: Identity issues and researcher responsibilities in workplace settings

Text and Talk

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 105-124

  Dickinson, Jules ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

British Sign Language (BSL); Collaboration; Deaf Deaf community; Interpreter; Positionality; Practitioner researcher

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950788897     PISSN: 18607330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2010.006     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alzouebi, Khadeegha. 2006. The splintering selves: A reflective journey. Paper presented at Methodological Issues in Linguistic Ethnography, Open University, Milton Keynes, 4 March
2. Angelelli, Claudia. 2003. The visible co-participant: The interpreter's role in doctor-patient encounters. In Melanie Metzger, Steven Collins, Valerie Dively & Rita Shaw (eds.), From topic boundaries to omission: New research on interpretation, 3-26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
3. Baker, Carol & Carol Padden. 1978. American Sign Language. A look at its history, structure and community. Silver Spring: Linstock Press
4. Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1985. Characteristics of oppressed and oppressor peoples: Their effect on the interpreting context. In Marina L. McIntire (ed.), Interpreting: The art of cross cultural mediation, 43-53. Silver Spring, MD: RID
5. Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1991. The interpreter: Machine, advocate, or ally? In Expanding horizons: Proceedings of the 1991 RID Convention, 120-140. Silver Spring, MD: RID
6. Baker-Shenk, Charlotte & Jim G. Kyle. 1990. Research with Deaf people: Issues and conflicts. Disability, Handicap & Society 5(1). 49-61
7. Baynton, Douglas C. 1996. Forbidden signs: American culture and the campaign against sign language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
8. Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press
9. Branson, Jan & Don Miller. 1995. Sign language and the discursive construction of power over the Deaf through education. In David Corson (ed.), Discourse and power in educational organisations, 167-189. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
10. Brennan, Mary, Martin D. Colville & Lillian K. Lawson. 1984. Words in hand: A structural analysis of the signs of British Sign Language. Carlisle: British Deaf Association
11. Brien, David (ed.). 1992. Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Faber and Faber
12. Cicourel, Aaron V. 1987. The interpenetration of communicative contexts: Examples from medical encounters. Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2). 217-226
13. Cokely, Dennis. 2005. Shifting positionality: A critical examination of the turning point in the relationship of interpreters and the Deaf community. In Mark Marschark, Rico Peterson & Elizabeth A. Winston (eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice, 3-28. New York: Oxford University Press
14. Collins, Judith M. & John Walker. 2006. What is a deaf interpreter? In Rachel M. McKee (ed.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the World Association of Sign Language Interpreters, 79-90. Coleford, Gloucestershire: Douglas McLean
15. Creese, Angela. 2008. Linguistic ethnography. In K. A. King & N. H. Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd edition, vol.10: Research methods in language and education, 229-241. Boston, MA: Springer
16. Cronin, Michael. 2002. The empire talks back: Orality, heteronomy and the cultural turn in interpreting studies. In Franz Pöchhacker & Miriam Shlesinger (eds.), The interpreting studies reader, 387-397. London: Routledge
17. Davidson, Brad. 1998. Interpreting medical discourse: A study of cross-linguistic communication in the hospital clinic. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation
18. Dean, Robyn K. & Robert Q. Pollard Jr. 2005. Consumers and service effectiveness in interpreting work: A practice profession perspective. In Mark Marschark, Rico Peterson & Elizabeth A. Winston (eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice, 259-282. New York: Oxford University Press
19. Denscombe, Martyn. 1998. The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. Berkshire, England: Open University Press
20. Drew, Paul & John Heritage. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 3-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
21. Edwards, Rosalind, Bogusia Temple & Claire Alexander. 2005. User's experiences of interpreters: The critical role of trust. Interpreting 7(1). 77-95
22. Erikson, Frederick. 2004. Talk and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press
23. Foster, Susan. 1996. Doing research in deafness: Some considerations and strategies. In Paul C. Higgins & Jeffrey E. Nash (eds.), Understanding deafness socially: Continuities in research and theory, 2nd edn., 3-20. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas
24. Goffman, Erving. 1961. Encounters-Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis & New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company
25. Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
26. Hale, Sandra. 1997. The treatment of register variation in court interpreting. The Translator 3(1). 39-54
27. Hammersley, Martyn & Paul Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London & New York: Routledge
28. Harris, Jennifer & Patricia Thornton. 2005. Barriers to labour market participation: The experience of Deaf and hard of hearing people. In Alan Roulstone & Colin Barnes (eds.), Working futures? Disabled people, policy and social inclusion. Bristol University, Bristol: The Policy Press
29. Janzen, Terry. 2005. Introduction to the theory and practice of signed language interpreting. In Terry Janzen (ed.), Topics in signed language interpreting, 3-24. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins
30. Kendall, Norma. 1999. Unequal to work: A brief review of literature on deafness and employment. Deaf Worlds 15(2). 16-20
31. Kyle, Jim G. & Alexy Dury. 2005. Sign of employment: Experiences and aspirations of Deaf people in employment. In D. Watson & V. Williams (eds.), A valued part of the Workforce? Employment and disabled people, 86-130. SEQUAL Development Partnership (DP)
32. Kyle, Jim G. & Gloria Pullen. 1988. Cultures in contact: Deaf and hearing people. Disability, Handicap & Society 3(1). 49-61
33. Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
34. Ladd, Paddy. 2003. Understanding Deaf culture: In search of Deafhood. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
35. Lane, Harlan. 1984. When the mind hears: A history of the Deaf. New York: Random House
36. Lane, Harlan. 1985. Keynote address-On language, power and the Deaf. In Marina L. McIntire (ed.), Interpreting: The art of cross cultural mediation, 1-12. Silver Spring, MD: RID
37. Leonard, Annette, Deb Duren & John Reiman. 2002. Considerations for mediating with people who are culturally Deaf. CADRE (Consortium for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education)
38. Marschark, Mark, Patricia Sapere, Carol Convertino & Rosemarie Seewagen. 2005. Educational interpreting: Access and outcomes. In Mark Marschark, Rico Peterson & Elizabeth A. Winston (eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice, 57-83. New York, USA: Oxford University Press
39. Mason, Ian. 2000. Models and methods in dialogue interpreting research. In Maeve Olohan (ed.), Intercultural faultlines: Research models in translation studies. I. Textual and cognitive aspects, 215-231. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome Publishing
40. McEntee-Atalianis, Lisa J. 2006. Minority rights in a supra-national era: The case of the Deaf community in the UK. BISAL 1. 20-40
41. Metzger, Melanie. 1995. The paradox of neutrality: A comparison of interpreter's goals with the reality of interactive discourse. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation
42. Metzger, Melanie. 1999. Sign language interpreting. Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington: Gallaudet University Press
43. Mindess, Anna. 1999. Reading between the signs: Intercultural communication for sign language interpreters. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press
44. Moody, Bill. 2007. Literal vs. liberal: What is a faithful interpretation? The Sign Language Translator and Interpreter 1(2). 179-220
45. Napier, Jemina. 2005. Linguistic features and strategies of interpreting: From research to education to practice. In Mark Marschark, Rico Peterson & Elizabeth A. Winston (eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice, 84-111. New York: Oxford University Press
46. Padden, Carol & Tom Humphries. 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
47. Punch, Maurice. 1993. Observation and the police: The research experience. In Martyn Hammersley (ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice, 181-199. London: Sage
48. Rampton, Ben K. 2007. Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5). 584-607
49. Rampton, Ben, Karin Tusting, Janet Maybin, Richard Barwell, Angela Creese & Vally Lytra. 2004. UK linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. www.ling-ethnog.org.uk (accessed 30 January 2006)
50. Rayman, Jennifer. 2007. Visions of equality: Translating power in a deaf sermonette. The Sign Language Translator and Interpreter 1(1). 73-114
51. Robson, Colin. 2002. Real world research. Malden, MA: Blackwell
52. Rose, Petra & Gary Kiger. 1995. Intergroup relations: Political action and identity in the Deaf community. Disability and Society 10(4). 521-528
53. Roy, Cynthia. 1989. A sociolinguistic analysis of the interpreter's role in the turn exchanges of an interpreted event. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation
54. Roy, Cynthia B. 2000. Interpreting as a discourse process. New York: Oxford University Press
55. Sanheim, Laura M. 2003. Turn exchange in an interpreted medical encounter. In Melanie Metzger, Steven Collins, Valerie Dively & Rita Shaw (eds.), From topic boundaries to omission: New research on interpretation, 27-54. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
56. Sarangi, Srikant. 2007. Editorial. The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst's paradox in professional discourse studies. Text & Talk 27. 567-584
57. Sarangi, Srikant & Celia Roberts. 1999. The dynamics of interactional and institutionalorders in work-related settings. In Srikant Sarangi & Celia Roberts (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, 1-57. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyer
58. Scollon, Ron & Suzanne Wong Scollon. 2001. Intercultural communication, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell
59. Scott-Gibson, Liz. 1991. Sign language interpreting: An emerging profession. In Susan Gregory & Gillian M. Hartley (eds.) Constructing deafness, 253-258. London: Pinter inassociation with the Open University
60. Skelton, Tracey & Gill Valentine. 2000. Living on the edge: Understanding the marginalisation and resistance of vulnerable youth. Report for Economic and Social Research Council, University of She‰eld
61. Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. 1993. Decolonising applied social sciences. In Martyn Hammersley (ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice, 52-63. London: Sage
62. Stone, Christopher. 2005. Towards a Deaf translation norm. Bristol, UK: Bristol University dissertation
63. Stone, Christopher. 2007. Deaf translators/interpreters' rendering processes: The translation of oral languages. The Sign Language Translator and Interpreter 1(1). 53-72
64. Thornton, Patricia. 2003. What works and looking ahead: UK policies and practices facilitating employment of disabled people. Report prepared for UK/US Pathways to Work in the 21st Century Seminar and Workshop, Washington DC. York: Social Policy Research Unit
65. Thornton, Patricia, Michael Hirst & Hilary Arksey. 2001. Users views of access to work: Final report of a study for the employment service (summary). Report ref: ESR72. R&D publications
66. Trowler, Paul & Graham H. Turner. 2002. Exploring the hermeneutic foundations of university life: Deaf academics in a hybrid "community of practice". Higher Education 43. 227-256
67. Turner, Graham H. 2005. Toward real interpreting. In Mark Marschark, Rico Peterson & Elizabeth A. Winston (eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice, 29-56. New York: Oxford University Press
68. Turner, Graham H. 2006. I'll tell you later: On institutional audism. Deaf Worlds 22(3). 50-70
69. Turner, Graham H., Jen K. Dodds & Lisa Richardson. 2002. "Always the last to know": Institutionalised audism and linguistic exclusion of Deaf people from workplace communities. Preston, England: University of Central Lancashire
70. Turner, Graham H. & Frank Harrington. 2000. Issues of power and method in interpreting research. In Maeve Olohan (ed.), Intercultural faultlines: Research models in translation studies. I. Textual and cognitive aspects, 253-265. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome Publishing
71. Tusting, Karin & Janet Maybin. 2007. Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5). 575-583
72. Wadensjö, Cecilia. 1992. Interpreting as interaction: On dialogue-interpreting in immigration hearings and medical encounters. Linköping: Linköping University dissertation
73. Wadensjö, Cecilia. 1998. Interpreting as interaction. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman
74. Ward Schofield, Janet. 1993. Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In Martyn Hammersley (ed.), In social research: Philosophy, politics and practice, 200-225. London: Sage
75. Woodward, James C. 1972. Implications for sociolinguistics research among the deaf. Sign Language Studies (1). 1-7
76. Wurm, Svenja. 2007. Intralingual and interlingual subtitling: A discussion of the mode and medium in film translation. The Sign Language Translator and Interpreter 1(1). 115-141