Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: Performance of radiologist and technologists

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 499-506

  Van Den Biggelaar, Frank J H M ^a   Kessels, Alphons G H ^a   Van Engelshoven, Jos M A ^a   Boetes, Caria ^a   Flobbe, Karin ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; Digital mammography; Performance; Radiologist; Sensitivity; Specificity; Technologist

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIST; RADIOLOGIST; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950691534     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0409-y     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. 1. Collins MJ, Hoffmeister J, Worrell SW (2006) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 27:351-355. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2006.05.009 (Pubitemid 44067369)
2. 2. Taylor PM, Champness J, Given-Wilson RM et al (2004) An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms. Br J Radiol 77:21-27. doi:10.1259/bjr/34203805 (Pubitemid 38219929)
3. 3. Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N et al (2007) Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 244:104-111. doi: 10.1148/radio.l.2441060756 (Pubitemid 46981963)
4. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG et al (2008) Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 359:1675-1684. doi:10.1056/NEJM.oa0803545
5. 5. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA et al (2007) Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 356:1399-1409. doi:10.1056/NEJM oa066099 (Pubitemid 46556325)
6. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12, 860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220:781-786. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2203()01282
7. 7. Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E et al (2007) Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 189:1135-1141. doi:1.02214/AJR.07.2393 (Pubitemid 350033006)
8. Gromet M (2008) Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231, 221 mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:854-859. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.07.2812
9. 9. Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Helvie MA et al (2006) Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms. Radiology 240:343-356. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2401042099 (Pubitemid 44098630)
10. 10. Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Verbeek AL et al (2003) Computeraided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 227:192-200. doi: 10.1148/radiol. 2271011962 (Pubitemid 36384199)
11. 11. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM (2005) Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 237:444-449, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2372041362 (Pubitemid 41507878)
12. 12. Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N et al (2008) Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology 246:71-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol. 2461062072 (Pubitemid 350305028)
13. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB et al (2006) Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1483-1491. doi.:102214/AJR.05.1582
14. Malich A, Schmidt S, Fischer DR et al. (2009) The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection. Eur J Radiol 69:574578. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.038
15. Taylor P, Potts HW (2008) Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on. cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 44:798-807. doi:10.1016/j,ejca..2008.02.016
16. Haiart DC, Henderson J (1991) A comparison of interpretation of screening mammograms by a radiographer, a doctor and a radiologist: results and implications. Br J Clin Pract 45:43-45
17. Hillman BJ, Fajardo LL, Hunter TB et al (1987) Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 149:907-912
18. 18. Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J et al (1996) Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions. Br J Radiol 69:10-14 (Pubitemid 26043494)
19. 19. Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J et al (1996) Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 3:18-22 (Pubitemid 126736069)
20. 20. Sumkin JH, Klaman HM, Graham M et al (2003) Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:253-256 (Pubitemid 36008721)
21. Wivell G, Denton ER, Eve CB et al (2003) Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Clin Radiol 58:63-67. doi: 1.0.1053/crad.2002.1087
22. 22. van den Biggelaar FJ, Nelemans PJ, Flobbe K (2008) Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. Breast 17:85-90. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.035 (Pubitemid 351228791)
23. van den Biggelaar FJHM, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population, (submitted for publication)
24. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-Mammography. American College of Radiology (ACR), Reston
25. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH et al (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129-1135. doi: 10.1.016/S0895-4356(03)00177-X
26. 26. Barlow WE, Lehman CD, Zheng Y et al (2002) Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1151-1159 (Pubitemid 34919052)
27. Poplack SP, Tosteson AN, Grove MR et al (2000) Mammography in 53, 803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. Radiology 217:832-840
28. 28. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL et al (2003) Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA 290:2129-2137. doi:10.1001/jama.290. 16.2129 (Pubitemid 37432973)
29. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, New York
30. Dean JC, Ilvento CC (2006) Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:20-28. doi:.10.2214/AJ.R.05.0111
31. 31. Flobbe K, Bosch AM, Kessels AG et al (2003) The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 163:1194-1199. doi:10.1001/archinte, 163,10.1194 (Pubitemid 36613072)
32. 32. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J et al (1999) Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 213:413-422 (Pubitemid 29510587)
33. 33. Wei. J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B et al (2007) Computer-aided detection, systems for breast masses: comparison, of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Acad Radiol 14:659-669. doi: 10.1016/j.acra. 2007.02.017 (Pubitemid 46900805)
34. Brancato B, Houssami N, Francesca D et al (2008) Does computer-aided detection (CAD) contribute to the performance of digital mammography in a self-referred population? Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:373-376. doi: 10.1007/s 10549-007-9786-9792
35. 35. Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA et al (2004) Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1840-1850 (Pubitemid 40081321)
36. Moss SM, Blanks RG, Bennett RL (2005) Is radiologists' volume of mammography reading related to accuracy? A critical review of the literature. Clin Radiol 60:623-626. doi:10.1016/j.crad. 2005.01.011