Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 94, Issue 15, 2002, Pages 1151-1159

  Barlow, William E ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^c   Zheng, Yingye ^b   Ballard Barbash, Rachel ^d   Yankaskas, Bonnie C ^e   Cutter, Gary R ^f   Carney, Patricia A ^g   Geller, Berta M ^h   Rosenberg, Robert ⁱ   Kerlikowske, Karla ^j   Weaver, Donald L ^h   Taplin, Stephen H ^a,c  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^g DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER REGISTRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SCREENING TEST; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

EID: 0037036668     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.15.1151     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. The New Mexico Mammography Project. Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993
2. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network
3. Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: A meta-analysis
4. Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: Comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently
5. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database
6. Current medico-legal and confidentiality issues in large multi-center research programs
7. Effect of variations in operational definitions on performance estimates for screening mammography
8. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS™ to report the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease
9. The mammography audit: A primer for the mammography quality standards act (MQSA)
10. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes
11. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging
12. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation
13. Symptomatic women with normal screening mammograms: Is assessment by the breast screening programme justifiable?
14. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer
15. The accuracy of "one-stop" diagnosis for 1110 patients presenting to a symptomatic breast clinic
16. Diagnostic value of radiological breast imaging in a non-screening population
17. Breast imaging
18. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography
19. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography
20. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings
21. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers
22. The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations
23. Variation in mammographic breast density by time in menstrual cycle among women aged 40-49 years
24. Screening mammography: Sensitivity and specificity in relation to hormone replacement therapy
25. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: Review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico
26. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers
27. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists
28. How experience and training influence mammography expertise
29. The additional value of US to mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. A prospective study
30. Diagnosis of breast cancer: Contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography
31. How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?
32. A study on the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography for screening women with dense breasts for breast cancer