Integrating technology into field-based experiences: a model that fosters change

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 286-302

  Judge, Sharon ^a   O'Bannon, Blanche ^b  

^a Health and Human Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Integration; Teacher education; Technology use

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTEGRATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TEACHING;

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; STUDENT LEARNING; TEACHER EDUCATION; TECHNOLOGY USE;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 33748049109     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barnett H. Assessing the effects of technology in a standards-driven world. Learning & Leading with Technology 27 7 (2000)
2. Becker H.J. How exemplary computer using teachers differ from other teachers: Implication for realizing the potential of computer in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26 (1994) 291-321
3. Becker, H. J., & Reil, M. (2000). Teacher professional engagement and constructivist compatible computer use (Report No. 7). Irvine: University of California, Irvine Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrived July 25, 2004. Available from www.crito.uci.edu/tlcfindings/report_7/TEXT.html.
4. CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (1999). Professional development: A link to better learning (Year Two Report). Washington, DC: CEO Forum on Education and Technology.
5. Consortium for School Networks (2004, June). Digital leadership divide: Without visionary leadership, disparities in school technology budgets increase. Retrieved August 26, 2004, from the Consortium for School Networks. Available from http://www.cosn.org.
6. Cummings L.E. Educational technology: A faculty resistance view. Part I: Incentives and understanding. Educational Technology 4 (1995) 13-18
7. Dawson K., and Nonis A. Preservice teachers' experiences in a K-12/university technology-based field initiative. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 17 1 (2000) 4-12
8. Dyrli O., and Kinnaman D. Gaining access to technology: The first step in making a difference for your students. Technology and Learning 14 4 (1994) 1 16-20, 48-50
9. Faison C.L. Modeling instructional technology use in teacher preparation: Why we can't wait. Educational Technology 36 (1996) 57-59
10. Glaser B.G., and Strauss A.L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (1967), Aldine Press, Chicago
11. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology standards for students: Connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR: Author. Available from http://cnets.iste.org.
12. International Society for Technology in Education. (2002). National educational technology standards for teachers: Preparing teachers to use technology. Eugene, OR: Author.
13. Kirk R.E. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (1982), Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, CA
14. Lee J.R., and Johnson C. Helping higher education faculty clear instructional technology hurdles. Educational Technology Review 10 (1998) 13-17
15. Lieberman A., and Miller L. Revisiting the social realities of teaching. In: Lieberman A., and Miller L. (Eds). Staff development for education in the '90s: New demands, new realities, new perspectives (1991), Teachers College Press, New York 92-109
16. McLaughlin R.T. Infusing technology in teacher education. Hands On 21 2 (1998) 16-18
17. Mann, D. (1999). Documenting the effects of instructional technology: A flyover of policy questions. Secretary's Conference on Education Technology (as cited in Ringstaff & Kelley, 2002).
18. Milken Exchange on Educational Technology. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology.
19. Moursund D., and Bielefeldt T. Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a information age? (1999), Milken Exchange on Education Technology, Santa Monica, CA
20. Munday R., Windham R., and Stamper J. Technology for learning: Are teachers being prepared?. Educational Technology 31 3 (1991) 29-32
21. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on teacher preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
22. Oliver H. Book review. Education and informatics worldwide: The state of the art and beyond. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 26 2 (1994) 285-290
23. OTA (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-HER-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. Ringstaff C., and Kelley L. The learning return on our education technology investment: A review of findings from research (2002), WestEd, San Francisco. www.WestEd.org/online_ppubs/learning_return.pdf
25. Ringstaff C., and Yocam K. Creating an alternative context for teacher development: The ACOT teacher report (H#18) (1995), Apple Computer, Inc., Cupertino, CA
26. Roblyer M.D., and Erlanger W. Preparing Internet-ready teachers: Which methods work best?. Learning and Leading with Technology 26 4 (1998) 59-61
27. Sandholtz J.H. Learning to teach with technology: A comparison of teacher development programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 9 3 (2001) 349-374
28. Schrum L. Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development 47 4 (1999) 83-90
29. Sheingold K. Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan 73 1 (1991) 17-27
30. Siegel J. The state of teacher training. Electronic Learning 14 8 (1995) 43-53
31. Smith S.J., and O'Bannon B.W. Faculty members infusing technology across teacher education: A mentorship model. Journal of Teacher Education and Special Education 22 2 (1999) 123-135
32. Smylie M. Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In: Guskey T.R., and Huberman M. (Eds). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (1995), Teachers College Press, New York 92-113
33. Sprague D., Kopfman K., and Dorsey S.L. Faculty development in the integration of technology in teacher education courses. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 14 2 (1998) 24-28
34. Statham, D. S., & Torell, C. R. (1999). Technology in public education in the United States (as cited in Ringstaff & Kelley, 2002).
35. Steinberg A. Will teachers open their doors to change?. In: Tovey R. (Ed). Professional development (1998), The Harvard Educational Letter Focus Series No. 4, Cambridge, MA 22-25
36. Strudler N., and Grove K.J. Integrating technology into teacher candidates' field experiences: A two-pronged approach. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 19 20 (2002) 33-39
37. Strudler N.B., and Wetzel K. Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development 47 4 (1999) 63-81
38. Thompson A., Hansen D., and Reinhart P. One-on-one technology mentoring for teacher education faculty: Case study reports. In: Robin B., Price J.D., Willis J., and Willis d. (Eds). Technology and teacher educational annual, 1996 (1996), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA 495-498
39. U.S. Department of Energy. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on preparation and qualifications of public school teachers (NCES 1999-080). Washington DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
40. Valdez, G. (2002). Learning through technology: A planning and implementation guide. Retrieved August 26, 2004, from the Teaching, Learning, and Curriculum Center of North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Available from http://www.ncrel.org/tandl/plan1.htm.
41. Vannatta R., and O'Bannon B. Beginning to put the pieces together: A technology infusion model for teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 18 4 (2001) 112-123
42. Wetzel K., and Strudler N. Experiencing technology. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 19 2 (2002) 30-32
43. Wetzel K., Zambo R., and Padgett H. A picture of change in technology-rich K-8 classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 18 1 (2001) 5-11
44. Willis E.M., and Sujo de Montes L. Does requiring a technology course in preservice teacher education affect student teacher's technology use in the classroom?. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 18 3 (2002) 76-80