The hybrid cochlear implant: A review

Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 67, Issue , 2010, Pages 125-134

  Woodson, Erika A ^a   Reiss, Lina A J ^a   Turner, Christopher W ^a   Gfeller, Kate ^a,b   Gantz, Bruce J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; REVIEW;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 77950348070     PISSN: 00653071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1159/000262604     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Hogan C, Turner CW: High-frequency amplification: benefits for hearingimpaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:432-441.
2. Ching T, Dillon H, Bryne D: Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:1128-1140.
3. Turner CW: Hearing loss and the limits of amplification. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11(Suppl 1):2-5.
4. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electric hearing. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1726-1730.
5. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/ Nucleus Hybrid Implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;24:344-347.
6. James CJ, Helbig S, Maier N, Kiefer J, Radeloff A, Adunka OF: Ipsilateral electric- acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation. Audiol Neurotol 2006:11(Suppl 1):49-56.
7. James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, Burdo S: Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:481-491.
8. Fraysse B, Macias AR, Sterkers O, et al: Residual hearing conservation and electro- acoustic stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:624-633.
9. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W-D, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O: Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:348-352.
10. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW: Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802.
11. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE: Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11(Suppl 1):63-68.
12. Reiss LA, Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:160-167.
13. Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, Oleson JJ, Reiss LA, Parkinson AJ: Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol Neurootol 2009;14(Suppl 1):32-38.
14. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A: Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1729-1735.
15. Turner C, Gantz BJ, Reiss L: Integration of acoustic and electric hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:769-778.
16. Ching TYC, Incerti P, Hill M, van Wanrooy E: An overview of binaural advantages for children and adults who use binaural/bimodal hearing devices. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11(Suppl 1):6-11.
17. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, McKarns SA, Spahr AJ: Combined electric and acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear 2007;50:835-843.
18. Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner C, Gantz B, Oleson J: Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neuroootol 2006;11(Suppl 1):12-15.
19. Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, Parisi ES, Clark GM: Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear Res 1996;99:139-150.
20. Boex C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kos MI, Pelizzone M: Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;7:110-124.
21. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ: Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:241-257.
22. Greenwood D: A cochlear frequencyposition function for several species - 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-2605.
23. Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BM, Leake PA: Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:220-233.
24. Kong Y-L, Stickney G, Zeng F-G: Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:1351-1361.
25. Dorman MF, Loizou PC, Rainey D: Simulating the effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:2993-2996.
26. Faulkner A, Rosen S, Stanton D: Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:1073-1080.
27. Rosen S, Faulkner A, Wilkinson L: Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;106:3629-3636.
28. Fu QJ, Nogaki G, Galvin JJ 3rd: Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005;6:180-189.