Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: Implications for cochlear implants

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 220-233

  Stakhovskaya, Olga ^a   Sridhar, Divya ^a   Bonham, Ben H ^a   Leake, Patricia A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Basal turn diameter; Critical bands

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTI ORGAN; DENDRITE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MICRODISSECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIRAL GANGLION; TEMPORAL BONE;

COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES; HUMANS; ORGAN OF CORTI; RADIAL NERVE; ROTATION; SPIRAL GANGLION;

EID: 34247468300     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. BASKENT D, SHANNON R. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2064-2076, 2003.
2. BASKENT D, SHANNON R. Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116(5):3130-3140, 2004.
3. BAUMANN U, NOBBE A. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Hear. Res. 213(1-2):34-42, 2006.
4. BLAMEY PJ, DOOLEY GJ, PARISI ES, CLARK GM. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear. Res. 99(1-2):139-150, 1996.
5. BOEX C, BAUD L, COSENDAI G, SIGRIST A, KOS MI, PELIZZONE M. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 7:110-124, 2006.
6. BREDBERG G. Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 236:1-135, 1968.
7. BRIAIRE JJ, FRIJNS JHM. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear. Res. 205(1-2):143-156, 2005.
8. BRIAIRE JJ, FRIJNS JHM. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach. Hear. Res. 214(1-2):17-27, 2006.
9. COHEN LT, XU J, XU SA, CLARK GM. Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Am. J. Otol. 17(6):859-865, 1996.
10. COHEN LT, RICHARDSON LM, SAUNDERS E, COWAN RSC. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear. Res. 179:72-87, 2003.
11. DIMOPOULOS P, MUREN C. Anatomic variations of the cochlea and relations to other temporal bone structures. Acta Radiol. 31:439-444, 1990.
12. DORMAN MF, LOIZOU PC, RAINEY D. Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:2993-2996, 1997.
13. ESCUDE B, JAMES C, DEGUINE O, COCHARD N, ETER E, FRAYSSE B. The size of the cochlea and prediction of the insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol. Neurootol. 11(Suppl):27-33, 2006.
14. FAYAD J, LINTHICUM FH, GALEY FR, OTTO S, HOUSE W. Cochlear implants: histopathologic findings related to performance in 16 human temporal bones. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 100:807-811, 1991.
15. FINLEY CC, BLAKE S, WILSON S, WHITE MW. Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: Miller JM and Spellman FA (eds) Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
16. FRIJNS JH, DE SNOO SL, SCHOONHOVEN R. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear. Res. 87(1-2):170-186, 1995.
17. FRIJNS JH, BRIAIRE JJ, GROTE JJ. The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 22(3):340-349, 2001.
18. FU QJ, SHANNON RV. Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1889-1900, 1999.
19. FU QJ, NOGAKI G, GALVIN JJ. Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6:180-189, 2005.
20. GLUECKERT R, PFALLER K, KINNEFORS A, RASK-ANDERSEN H, SCHROTTFISCHER A. The human spiral ganglion: new insights into ultrastructure, survival rate and implications for cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 10:258-273, 2005.
21. GREENWOOD DD. Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33:1344-1356, 1961.
22. GREENWOOD DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87(6):2592-2605, 1990.
23. GREENWOOD DD. Critical bandwidth and consonance in relation to cochlear frequency-position coordinates. Hear. Res. 54:164-208, 1991.
24. HARDY M. The length of the organ of Corti in man. Am. J. Anat. 62:291-311, 1968.
25. HINOJOSA R, MARION M. Histopathology of profound sensorineural deafness. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 405:459-483, 1983.
26. HOCHMAIR I, ARNOLD W, NOPP P, JOLLY C, MULLER J, ROLAND P. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol. 123:612-617, 2003.
27. KAWANO A, SELDON HL, CLARK GM. Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: measurement of the lengths of organ of Corti, outer wall, inner wall, and Rosenthal_s canal. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 105(9):701-709, 1996.
28. KETTEN D, SKINNER MW, WAND G, VANNIER MW, GATES GA, NEELY JG. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 107:1-16, 1998.
29. KHAN A, HANDZEL O, DAMIAN D, EDDINGTON DK, NADOL JB. Effect of cochlear implantation on residual spiral ganglion cell count as determined by comparison with the contralateral nonimplanted inner ear in humans. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 114(5):381-385, 2005.
30. LEAKE P, HRADEK G. Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hear. Res. 33(1):11-33, 1988.
31. MARSH MA, XU J, BLAMEY PJ, WHITFORD LA, XU SA, SILVERMAN JM, CLARK GM. Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. Am. J. Otol. 14(4):386-391, 1993.
32. MCFADDEN SL, DING D, JIANG H, SALVI RJ. Time course of efferent fiber and spiral ganglion cell degeneration following complete hair cell loss in the chinchilla. Brain Res. 997(1):40-51, 2004.
33. MINO H, RUBINSTEIN JT, MILLER CA, ABBAS PJ. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51(1):13-20, 2004.
34. NADOL JBJ. Degeneration of cochlear neurons as seen in the spiral ganglion of man. Hear. Res. 49(1-3):141-154, 1990.
35. NADOL JB. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117:220-228, 1997.
36. NADOL JB, YOUNG YS, GLYNN RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 98(6):411-416, 1989.
37. OTTE J, CHILE S, SCHUKNECHT H, KERR AG. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 88:1231-1246, 1978.
38. PFINGST BE, FRANCK KH, XU L, BAUER EM, ZWOLAN TA. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2(2):87-103, 2001.
39. RICHTER B, JAEKEL K, ASCHENDORFF A, MARANGOS N, LASZIG R. Cochlear structures after implantation of a perimodiolar electrode array. Laryngoscope 111(5):837-843, 2001.
40. ROSEN S, FAULKNER A, WILKINSON L. Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:3629-3636, 1999.
41. SATO H, SANDO I, TAKAHASHI H. Sexual dimorphism and development of the human cochlea. Computer 3-D measurement. Acta Otolaryngol. 111(6):1037-1040, 1991.
42. SHANNON RV, ZENG FG, WYGONSKI J. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:2467-2476, 1998.
43. SKINNER MW, KETTEN DR, HOLDEN LK, HARDING GW, SMITH PG, GATES GA, NEELY JG, KLETZKER GR, BRUNSDEN B, BLOCKER B. CT-derived estimation of cochlearmorphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3:332-350, 2002.
44. SRIDHAR D, STAKHOVSKAYA O, LEAKE P. A frequency-position function for the human cochlear spiral ganglion. Audiol. Neurootol. 11(Suppl):16-20, 2006.
45. STICKNEY GS, LOIZOU PC, MISHRA LN, ASSMANN PF, SHANNON RV, OPIE JM. Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions. Hear. Res. 211(1-2):33-45, 2006.
46. TYKOCINSKI M, COHEN LT, PYMAN BC, ROLAND T JR, TREABA C, PALAMARA J, DAHM MC, SHEPHERD RK, XU J, COWAN RS, COHEN NL, CLARK GM. Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays. Am. J. Otol. 21(2):205-211, 2000.
47. ULEHLOVA L, VOLDRICH L, JANISCH R. Correlative study of sensory cell density and cochlear length in humans. Hear. Res. 28:149-151, 1987.
48. WARDROP P, WHINNEY D, REBSCHER SJ, ROLAND JT JR, LUXFORD W, LEAKE PA. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contouri electrodes. Hear. Res. 203:54-67, 2005a.
49. WARDROP P, WHINNEY D, REBSCHER SJ, LUXFORD W, LEAKE PA. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: comparison of Spiral Clarioni and HiFocus IIi electrodes. Hear. Res. 203:68-79, 2005b.
50. WRIGHT A, DAVIS A, BREDBERG G, ULEHLOVA L, SPENCER H. Hair cell distributions in the normal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 444:1-48, 1987.
51. XU J, XU SA, COHEN LT, CLARK GM. Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am. J. Otol. 21(1):49-56, 2000.
52. YOO SK, WANG G, RUBINSTEIN JT, VANNIER MW. Three-dimensional geometric modeling of the cochlea using helico-spiral approximation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47(10):1392-1402, 2000.
53. YUKAWA K, COHEN L, BLAMEY P, PYMAN B, TUNGVACHIRAKUL V, O'LEARY S. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol Neurootol. 9:163-172, 2004.