Integration of acoustic and electrical hearing

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 769-778

  Turner, Christopher ^a,b   Gantz, Bruce J ^b   Reiss, Lina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Combined acoustic and electrical hearing; Frequency selectivity; Hearing aid; Hearing loss; High frequency hearing loss; Rehabilitation; Residual hearing; Sensorineural hearing loss; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

COCHLEAR IMPLANT; COMBINED ACOUSTIC AND ELECTRICAL HEARING; FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HIGH-FREQUENCY HEARING LOSS; REHABILITATION; RESIDUAL HEARING; SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS;

ACOUSTICS; DIGITAL FILTERS; HEARING AIDS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); PATIENT REHABILITATION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

AUDITION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DEVICE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FOLLOW UP; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COHORT STUDIES; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEARING LOSS, HIGH-FREQUENCY; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SAMPLING STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 59649105054     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.05.0065     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pavlovic CV. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;75(4):1253-1258
2. Kamm CA, Dirks DD, Bell TS. Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1985;77(1):281-288
3. Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 104(1):432-441
4. Ching TY, Dillon H, Bryne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103(2):1128-1140
5. Schmiedt RA, Lang H, Okamura HO, Schulte BA. Effects of furosemide applied chronically to the round window: A model of metabolic presbyacusis. J Neurosci. 2002;22(21):9643-9650
6. Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res. 1984;16(1):55-74.
7. Dooley GJ, Blamey PJ, Seligman PM, Alcantara JI, Clark GM, Shallop JK, Arndt P, Heller JW, Menapace CM. Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal prosthesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(1):55-60.
8. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;117(3 Pt 1):1351-1361
9. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M, Van Wanrooy E. An overview of binaural advantages for children and adults who use binaural/ bimodal hearing devices. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:6-11.
10. Gantz BJ, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004;124(4):344-347
11. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:63-68.
12. Reiss LA, Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(2):160-167
13. Trees DA, Turner CW. Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. Audiology. 1986;25(2):70-83.
14. Glasberg BR, Moore BC. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986;79(4):1020-1033
15. Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Wang X. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104(6):3586-3596
16. Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110(2):1150-1163
17. Qin MK, Oxenham AJ. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(1):446-454
18. Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens A. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: Normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118(2):1111-1121
19. Henry BA, Turner CW. The role of spectral resolution in cochlear implant speech recognition in competing backgrounds. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses; 2005 Aug; Asilomar (CA).
20. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115(4):1729-1735
21. Qin MK, Oxenham AJ. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119(4): 2417-2426
22. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: Effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol. 1999;20(4): 445-452
23. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Turner C, Gantz B, Oleson J. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:12-15.
24. Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: Implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;8(2):220-233
25. Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;87(6):2592-2605.
26. Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Galvin JJ 3rd. Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112(4):1664-1674
27. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007;8(2):241-257
28. Lippman RP. Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Proc. 1996;4(1):66-69.
29. Fu QJ, Shannon RV. Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;105(3):1889-1900.