Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 137, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  White, Aaron J ^a   Fallis, Drew W ^a   Vandewalle, Kraig S ^a  

^a WILFORD HALL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGINIC ACID; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COPPER; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PILOT STUDY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGINATES; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; COPPER; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; JAW RELATION RECORD; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES;

EID: 77950130916     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Rheude B., Sadowsky P.L., Ferriera A., and Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 300-304
2. Joffe L. OrthoCAD™: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod 31 (2004) 1-4
3. Garino F., and Garino G. Digital treatment objectives: procedure and clinical application. Prog Orthod 5 (2004) 248-256
4. Peluso M., Josell S., Levine S., and Lorei B. Digital models: an introduction. Semin Orthod 10 (2004) 226-238
5. Garino F., and Garino G. From digital casts to digital occlusal set-up: an enhanced diagnostic tool. World J Orthod 4 (2003) 162-166
6. Stewart M. Dental models in 3D. Orthod Prod 2 (2001) 21-24
7. Marcel T. Our digital model experience: a six-month Orthocad™ user report. PCSO Bull 73 (2001) 1,4
8. Marcel T. Three-dimensional on-screen virtual models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 (2001) 666-668
9. Redmond W. Digital models: a new diagnostic tool. J Clin Orthod 35 (2001) 386-387
10. Lemay M. Logistics in digital orthodontic models. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 18 (2007) 25-28
11. Tomassetti J.J., Taloumis L.J., Denny J.M., and Fischer Jr. J.R. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly-used method. Angle Orthod 71 (2001) 351-357
12. Stevens D.R., Flores-Mir C., Nebbe B., Raboud D.W., Heo G., and Major P.W. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006) 794-803
13. Mok C.W., Zhou L., McGrath C., Hägg U., and Bendeus M. Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need. Acta Odontol Scand 65 (2007) 362-368
14. Whetton J.L., Williamson P.C., Heo G., Varnhagen C., and Major P.W. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 (2006) 485-491
15. Zilberman O., Huggare J., and Parikakis K. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73 (2003) 301-306
16. Santoro M., Galkin S., Teredesai M., Nicolay O., and Cangialosi T. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 101-105
17. Quimby M., Vig K., Rashid R., and Firestone A. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 74 (2004) 298-303
18. Garino F., and Garino G. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 3 (2002) 250-254
19. Cha B.K., Choi J.I., Jost-Brinkman P.G., and Jeong Y.M. Applications of three-dimensionally scanned models in orthodontics. Int J Comput Dent 10 (2007) 41-52
20. Asquith J., Gillgrass T., and Mossey P. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 29 (2007) 517-522
21. Gracco A., Buranello M., Cozzani M., and Siciliani G. Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and time. Prog Orthod 8 (2007) 252-259
22. Redlich M., Weinstock T., Abed Y., Schneor R., Holdstein Y., and Fischer A. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res 11 (2008) 90-95
23. Hayasaki H., Martins R.P., Gandini L.G., Saitoh I., and Nonaka K. A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 128-132
24. Mayers M., Firestone A., Rashid R., and Vig K. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 431-434
25. Okunami T., Kusnoto B., BeGole E., Evans C., Sadowsky C., and Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 (2007) 51-56
26. Costalos P., Sarraf K., Cangialosi T., and Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 624-629
27. Hildebrand J.C., Palomo J.M., Palomo L., Sivik M., and Hans M. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133 (2008) 283-289
28. Macchi A., Carrafiello G., Cacciafesta V., and Norcini A. Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006) 605-610
29. Rangel F.A., Maal T.J., Berge S.J., van Vlijmen O.J., Plooij J.M., Schutyser F., et al. Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 (2008) 820-826
30. Eames W.B., Wallace S.W., Suway N.B., and Rogers L.B. Accuracy and dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 41 (1979) 517-521
31. McCabe J.F., and Wilson H.J. Addition curing silicone rubber impression materials. An appraisal of their physical properites. Br Dent J 145 (1978) 17-20
32. Craig R.G. A review of properties of rubber impression materials. J Mich Dent Assoc 59 (1977) 254-261
33. Tjan A.H.L., Whang S.B., Tjan A.H., and Sarkissian R. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 56 (1986) 4-8
34. Lee H., Wu B., and Ting K. Preliminary studies on Invisalign tray fabrication. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 (2002) A1
35. Kuo E., and Miller R.J. Automated custom-manufacturing technology in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003) 578-581
36. O'Brien W. Dental materials and their selection. 2nd ed. (1997), Quintessence, Ann Arbor, MI p. 130-131
37. Powers J., and Sakaguchi R. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. (2006), Mosby, St Louis p. 270-8
38. Alcan T., Ceylanoglu C., and Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 79 (2009) 30-36
39. Aurum Classic Product Collection: Kromopan 100 alginate. Available at: http://aurumgroup.com. Accessed on September 5, 2007.
40. Straw J., Iuorno F., and Findauer S. Dimensional stability of Kromopan, an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Dent Res (2003) Abstr 290,82:Special Issue A
41. Choe H., Lindemuth J.S., Dossett J.M., and Shockley L.R. Surface reproduction of three irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials over time. J Dent Res (2006) Abstr 1398,85:Special Issue A.
42. Ballrick J.W., Palomo J.M., Ruch E., Amberman B.D., and Hans M.G. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 (2008) 573-582
43. Mozzo P., Procacci C., Tacconi A., Martini P.T., and Adreis I.A. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 8 (1998) 1558-1564
44. Lascala C.A., Panella J., and Marques M.M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-New Tom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 (2004) 291-294