Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 362-368

  Mok, Chung Wai ^a   Zhou, Lei ^a   McGrath, Colman ^a   Hägg, Urban ^a,b   Bendeus, Margareta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Dental; Dental models; Photography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAST APPLICATION; CHILD; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIGITAL IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTICS;

CHILD; DENTAL HEALTH SURVEYS; DENTAL MODELS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALOCCLUSION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 37049027696     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: 15023850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350701771850     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic diagnosis: the development of a problem list. In: Proffit WR, editor. Contemporary orthodontics, 4th edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007. p. 193-4.
2. Björk A, Krebbs A, Solow B. A method for epidemiological registration of malocclusion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:27-41.
3. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-20.
4. Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod 2000;27:149-62.
5. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7.
6. Code of Professional Discipline for the Guidance of Dental Practitioners in Hong Kong: The Dental Council of Hong Kong; 2007.
7. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;30:219-23.
8. Nollet PJ, Katsaros C, van't Hof MA, Bongaarts CA, Semb G, Shaw WC, et al. Photographs of study casts: an alternative medium for rating dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:646-50.
9. Costalos PA, Sarraf K, Cangialosi TJ, Efstratiadis S. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:624-9.
10. Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:51-6.
11. Cochran JA, Ketley CE, Sanches L, Mamai-Homata E, Oila AM, Arnadóttir IB, et al. A standardized photographic method for evaluating enamel opacities including fluorosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32 Suppl 1:19-27.
12. Wong HM, McGrath C, Lo EC, King NM. Photographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamel. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:438-46.
13. Sandler PJ, Murray AM, Bearn D. Digital records in orthodontics. Dent Update 2002;29:18-24.
14. Mandall NA. Are photographic records reliable for orthodontic screening? J Orthod 2002;29:125-7.
15. Cooke MS, Wei SH. Cephalometric standards for the southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:264-72.
16. Stephens CD, Bowden DEJ. Examination of the patient. In: Shaw WC, editor. Orthodontics and occlusal management. Oxford and Boston, MA: Wright; 1993. p. 83-99.
17. Mitchell D, Mitchell L. Oxford handbook of clinical dentistry, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p 136.
18. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 1899;41:248-64,350-7.
19. Girish V, Vijayalaskshmi A. Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/Image J. Indian J Cancer 2004;41:41-7.
20. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37-46.
21. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 1971;76:378-82.
22. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
24. Petrie A. Further statistics in dentistry. London: British Dental Association; 2002.
25. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Ortho Orthognath Surg 1998;13:97-106.