A censored beta mixture model for the estimation of the proportion of non-differentially expressed genes

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 640-646

  Markitsis, Anastasios ^a   Lai, Yinglei ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC DATABASE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 77949647700     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allison, D.B. et al. (2002)Amixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 39, 1-20.
2. Barrett, T. et al. (2007) NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles-database and tools update. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D760-D765.
3. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289-300.
4. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat., 29, 1165-1188.
5. Broberg, P. (2005)Acomparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 199.
6. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature, 455, 1061-1068.
7. Chen, Z. et al. (2005) Where CD4+CD25+ T reg cells impinge on autoimmune diabetes. J. Exp. Med., 202, 1387-1397.
8. Cui, X. and Churchill, G.A. (2003) Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol., 4, 210.
9. Dalmasso, C. et al. (2005) A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics, 21, 660-668.
10. Dudoit, S. et al. (2003) Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Stat. Sci., 18, 71-103.
11. Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat., 7, 1-26.
12. Efron, B. (2007) Correlation and large-scale simultaneous significance testing. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 102, 93-103.
13. Flechner, S.M. et al. (2004) De novo kidney transplantation without use of calcineurin inhibitors preserves renal structure and function at two years. Am. J. Transplant., 4, 1776-1785.
14. Guan, Z. et al. (2008) Nonparametric estimator of false discovery rate based on Bernstein polynomials. Stat. Sin., 18, 905-923.
15. Harvey, B.G. et al. (2007) Modification of gene expression of the small airway epithelium in response to cigarette smoking. J. Mol. Med., 85, 39-53.
16. Jiang, H. and Doerge, R.W. (2008) Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses for multiple comparisons. Cancer Inform., 6, 25-32.
17. Ji, Y. et al. (2005) Applications of beta-mixture models in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 21, 2118-2122.
18. Jung, S-H. (2005) Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics, 21, 3097-3104.
19. Lai, Y. (2007) A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data. Biostatistics, 8, 744-755.
20. Langaas, M. et al. (2005) Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 67, 555-572.
21. Liao, J.G. et al. (2004) A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis. Bioinformatics, 20, 2694-2701.
22. Lockhart, D. et al. (1996) Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat. Biotechnol., 14, 1675-1680.
23. Lu, X. and Perkins, D.L. (2007) Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures. BMC Bioinformatics, 18, 157.
24. McLachlan, G.J. et al. (2006) A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays. Bioinformatics, 22, 1608-1615.
25. McLachlan, G.J. and Krishnan, T. (2008) The EM algorithm and extensions, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, pp. 18-26.
26. Mootha, V.K. et al. (2003) PGC-1(-response genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet., 34, 267-273.
27. Mosig, M.O. et al. (2001) A whole genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting milk protein percentage in Israeli-Holstein cattle, by means of selective milk DNA pooling in a daughter design, using an adjusted false discovery rate criterion. Genetics, 157, 1683-1698.
28. Nagalakshmi, U. et al. (2008) The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science, 320, 1344-1349.
29. Nettleton, D. et al. (2006) Estimating the number of true null hypotheses from a histogram of p values. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat., 11, 337-356.
30. Pounds, S. and Morris, S.W. (2003) Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics, 19, 1236-1242.
31. Pounds, S. and Cheng, C. (2004) Improving false discovery rate estimation. Bioinformatics, 20, 1737-1745.
32. Pounds, S. and Cheng, C. (2005) Sample size determination for the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics, 21, 4263-4271.
33. Pounds, S. and Cheng, C. (2006) Robust estimation of the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics, 22, 1979-1987.
34. Salvatore, P. et al. (2008) Detrimental effects of Bartonella henselae are counteracted by L-arginine and nitric oxide in human endothelial progenitor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 9427-9432.
35. Scheid, S. and Spang, R. (2004) A stochastic downhill search algorithm for estimating the local false discovery rate. IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 1, 98-108.
36. Schena, M. et al. (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science, 270, 467-470.
37. Singh, D. et al. (2002) Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. Cancer Cell, 1, 203-209.
38. Storey, J.D. (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 64, 479-498.
39. Storey, J.D. and Tibshirani, R. (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 9440-9445.
40. Tsai, C-A. et al. (2003) Estimation of false discovery rates in multiple testing: application to gene microarray data. Biometrics, 59, 1071-1081.
41. Wang, S-J. and Chen, J.J. (2004) Sample size for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments. J. Comput. Biol., 11, 714-726.
42. Wilhelm, B.T. et al. (2008) Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature, 453, 1239-1243.