Applications of beta-mixture models in bioinformatics

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 2118-2122

  Ji, Yuan ^a   Wu, Chunlei ^b   Liu, Ping ^a   Wang, Jing ^a   Coombes, Kevin R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b 3M COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; GENE EXPRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 18744410117     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti318     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Akaike,H. (1973) Information theory and the extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Petrov,V. and Csaki,F. (eds), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Akailseoniai-kiudo, Budapest, pp. 267-281.
2. Beer,D. et al. (2002) Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Nat. Med., 8, 816-824.
3. Biernacki,C. et al. (1998). Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated classification likelihood. Technical Report No. 3521. INRIA, Rhone-Alpes.
4. Dempster,A. et al. (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 39, 1-38.
5. Ghosh,D. et al. (2003) Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: a case study in prostate cancer. Funct. Integr. Genomics, 4, 180-188.
6. Kuo,W. et al. (2002) Analysis of matched mRNA measurements from two different microarray technologies. Bioinformatics, 18, 405-412.
7. Leroux,B (1992). Consistent estimation of a mixing distribution. Ann. Stat., 20, 1350-1360.
8. McLachlan,G. and Peel,D. (2000) Finite Mixture Models. John Wiley and Sons, NY.
9. Parmigiani,G. et al. (2004) A cross-study comparison of gene expression studies for the molecular classification of lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 10, 2922-2927.
10. Pusztai,L. et al. (2003) Gene expression profiles obtained from single passage fine needle aspirations (FNA) of breast cancer reliably identify prognostic/predictive markers such as estrogen (er) and HER-2 receptor status and reveal large scale molecular differences between ER-negative and ER-positive tumors. Clin. Cancer Res., 9, 2406-2415.
11. Roeder,K. and Wasserman,L. (1997) Practical density estimation using mixtures of normals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 92, 894-902.
12. Sabatti,C. et al. (2002) Co-expression pattern from DNA microarray experiments as a tool for operon prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 13, 2886-2893.
13. Schwarz,G. (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat., 6, 461-464.