A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data

Biostatistics

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 744-755

  Lai, Yinglei ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Microarray; Moment estimator; Proportion of true null hypothesis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DNA MICROARRAY; EVALUATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

BIOMETRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 34848837945     PISSN: 14654644     EISSN: 14684357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ALLISON, D. B., GADBURY, G. L., HEO, M., FERNANDEZ, J. R., LEE, C.-K., PROLLA, T. A. AND WEINDRUCH, R. (2002). A mixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 39, 1-20.
2. BENJAMINI, Y. AND HOCHBERG, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57, 289-300.
3. CASELLA, G. AND BERGER, R. L. (2002). Statistical Inference, 2nd edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
4. DALMASSO, C., BROËT, P. AND MOREAU, T. (2005). A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics 21, 660-668.
5. EFRON, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7, 1-26.
6. HEDENFALK, I., DUGGAN, D., CHEN, Y., RADMACHER, M., BITTNER, M., SIMON, R., MELTZER, P., GUSTERSON, B., ESTELLER, M., KALLIONIEMI, O.P. and others (2001). Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 344, 539-548.
7. JUNG, S.-H. (2005). Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 21, 3097-3104.
8. LAI, Y. (2006). A statistical method for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes. Computational Biology and Chemistry 30, 193-202.
9. LANGAAS, M., LINDQVIST, B. H. AND FERKINGSTAD, E. (2005). Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 67, 555-572.
10. PAWITAN, Y., MICHIELS, S., KOSCIELNY, S., GUSNANTO, A. AND PLONER, A. (2005a). False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies. Bioinformatics 21, 3017-3024.
11. PAWITAN, Y., MURTHY, K. R. K., MICHIELS, S. AND PLONER, A. (2005b). Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies. Bioinformatics 20, 3865-3872.
12. POUNDS, S. AND CHENG, C. (2004). Improving false discovery rate estimation. Bioinformatics 20, 1737-1745.
13. POUNDS, S. AND MORRIS, S. W. (2003). Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 19, 1236-1242.
14. STOREY, J. D. AND TIBSHIRANI, R. (2003). Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 9440-9445.
15. TADESSE, M. G., IBRAHIM, J. G., VANNUCCI, M. AND GENTLEMAN, R. (2005). Wavelet thresholding with Bayesian false discovery rate control. Biometrics 61, 25-35.
16. TROYANSKAYA, O., CANTOR, M., SHERLOCK, G., BROWN, P., HASTIE, T., TIBSHIRANI, R., BOTSTEIN, D. AND ALTMAN, R. B. (2001). Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17, 520-525.
17. WANG, S.-J. AND CHEN, J. J. (2004). Sample size for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments. Journal of Computational Biology 11, 714-726.
18. WIESTNER, A., ROSENWALD, A., BARRY, T. S., WRIGHT, G., DAVIS, R. E., HENRICKSON, S. E., ZHAO, H., IBBOTSON, R. E., ORCHARD, J. A., DAVIS, Z. and others (2003). ZAP-70 expression identifies a chronic lymphocytic leukemia subtype with unmutated immunoglobulin genes, inferior clinical outcome, and distinct gene expression profile. Blood 101, 4944-4951.
19. WU, B., ABBOTT, T., FISHMAN, D., MCMURRAY, W., MOR, G., STONE, K., WARD, D., WILLIAMS, K. AND ZHAO, H. (2003). Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 19, 1636-1643.