Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery

Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-34

  Barnden, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contiguity; Image metaphors.; Metaphor; Metaphor metonymy distinction; Metonymy; Part whole metonymy; Representational metonymy; Resemblance metaphors; Similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949359962     PISSN: 09365907     EISSN: 16133641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/COGL.2010.001     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Barcelona, Antonio (ed.). 2000a. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
2. Barcelona, Antonio. 2000b. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 31-58. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
3. Barcelona, Antonio. 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 207-277. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
4. Barcelona, Antonio. 2004. Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly "irregular" grammatical behavior of English paragon names. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 357-374. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
5. Barnden, John A. 2001. Uncertainty and conflict handling in the ATT-Meta contextbased system for metaphorical reasoning. In Varol Akman, Paolo Bouquet, Richmond Thomason & Roger A. Young (eds.), Modeling and using context: Third International and Interdisciplinary Conference (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2116), 15-29. Berlin: Springer
6. Barnden, John A. 2006. Artificial intelligence, figurative language and cognitive linguistics. In Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibá -ñez (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives, 431-459. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
7. Barnden, John A., Sheila R. Glasbey, Mark G. Lee & Alan M. Wallington. 2004. Varieties and directions of inter-domain influence in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 19(1). 1-30
8. Black, Max. 1993 [1979]. More about metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edn., 19-41. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press
9. Cameron, Lynne. 1999a. Operationalising 'metaphor' for applied linguistic research. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 1-28. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press
10. Cameron, Lynne. 1999b. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 105-132. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press
11. Chiappe, Dan L. 1998. Similarity, relevance, and the comparison process. Metaphor and Symbol 13(1). 17-30
12. Cooper, David E. 1986. Metaphor. Oxford: Blackwell
13. Croft, William. 2002. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 161-205. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
14. Croft, William. 2006. On explaining metonymy: Comments on Peirsman and Geeraerts, "Metonymy as a prototypical category." Cognitive Linguistics 17(3). 317-326
15. Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press
16. Dirven, René. 2002. Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 75-111. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
17. Dirven, René & Ralf Pörings (eds.). 2002. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
18. Fass, Dan. 1997. Processing metaphor and metonymy. Greenwich, CN: Ablex
19. Fauconnier, Gilles. 2009. Generalized integration networks. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 147-160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
20. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2). 133-187
21. Feyaerts, Kurt. 2000. Refining the Inheritance Hypothesis: Interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 59-78. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
22. Geeraerts, Dirk. 2002. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 435-465. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
23. Gibbs, Ray W., Jr. 1990. Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16(1). 56-66
24. Gibbs, Ray W., Jr. 1999. Researching metaphor. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 29-47. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press
25. Goatly, Andrew. 1997. The language of metaphors. London & New York: Routledge
26. Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill
27. Goossens, Louis. 1990. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 323-340
28. Glucksberg, S. 2001. Understanding figurative language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press
29. Glucksberg, Sam & Boaz Keysar. 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review 97(1). 3-18
30. Grady, Joseph E. 1997. THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8(4). 267-290
31. Group m. 1981. A general rhetoric. Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press
32. Haser, Verena. 2005. Metaphor, metonymy and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
33. Indurkhya, Bipin. 1992. Metaphor and cognition: An interactionist approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer
34. Jakobson, Roman. 2002 [1956]. The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 41-47. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Reprinted with added abstract by René Dirven from Roman Jakobson & M. Halle (eds.) 1971 [1956], Fundamentals of Language 2, 90-96. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.)
35. Kittay, Eva F. 1989. Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press
36. Kövecses, Zoltán. 1990. Emotion concepts. Berlin & New York: Springer
37. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press
38. Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edn., 202-251. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press
39. Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
40. Langlotz, Andreas. 2006. Idiom creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiomrepresentation and idiom-variation in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins
41. Lodge, David. 1977. The modes of modern writing: Metaphor, metonymy and the typology of modern literature. London: Edward Arnold; Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
42. Moore, Kevin E. 2006. Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17(2). 199-244
43. Norrick, Neal R. 1981. Semiotic principles in semantic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
44. Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1978. The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club
45. Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1995. Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12(2). 109-132
46. Panther, Klaus-Uwe. 2006. Metonymy as a usage event. In Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives, 147-185. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
47. Paradis, Carita. 2004. Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19(4). 245-264
48. Peirsman, Yves & Dirk Geeraerts. 2006. Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics 17(3). 269-316
49. Pragglejaz Group 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1). 1-39.
50. Radden, Günter. 2002. How metonymic are metaphors? In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. 407-434. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
51. Radden, Günter & Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden, Metonymy in language and thought, 17-59. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins
52. Radman, Zdravko. 1997. Di‰culties with diagnosing the death of a metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 12(2). 149-157
53. Riemer, Nick. 2001. Remetonomyzing metaphor: Hypercategories in semantic extension. Cognitive Linguistics 12(4). 379-401
54. Riemer, Nick. 2002. When is a metonymy no longer a metonymy. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 379-406. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
55. Ritchie, L. David. 2006. Context and connection in metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan
56. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñ ez, Francisco J. 1999. From semantic underdetermination via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Paper No. 492, LAUD Linguistic Agency, SERIES A: General and Theoretical Papers
57. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñ ez, Francisco J. & Olga I. Díez Velasco. 2002. Patterns of conceptual interaction. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 489-532. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
58. Stern, Josef. 2000. Metaphor in context. Cambridge, MA & London, UK: Bradford Books, MIT Press
59. Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier. 1995. Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(3). 183-204
60. Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier. 2000. Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 133-145. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
61. Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier. 2002. Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 469-487. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
62. Ullmann, Stephen. 1962. Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Blackwell
63. Warren, Beatrice. 1999. Aspects of referential metonymy. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden, Metonymy in language and thought, 121-135. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins
64. Warren, Beatrice. 2002. An alternative account of the interpretation of referential metonymy and metaphor. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 113-130. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter
65. Warren, Beatrice. 2006. Referential metonymy. Scripta Minora of the Royal Society of Letters at Lund, 2003-2004: 1. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International
66. Wee, Lionel. 2006. Proper names and the theory of metaphor. Journal of Linguistics 42. 355-371