Metonymy as a prototypical category

Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 269-316

  Peirsman, Yves ^a   Geeraerts, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Metonymy; Prototypicality

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750156473     PISSN: 09365907     EISSN: 16133641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/COG.2006.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barcelona, A. 2002 Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: an update. In Dirven, R. and R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 207-278.
2. 2003 Metonymy in cognitive linguistics. An analysis and a few modest proposals. In Cuyckens, H., Th. Berg, R. Dirven and K.-U. Panther (eds.), Motivation in Language, Studies in Honor of Günter Radden. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 223-255.
3. Blank, A. 1999 Co-presence and succession: A cognitive typology of metonymy. In Panther, K.-U. and O. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 169-191.
4. Bonhomme, M. 1987 Linguistique de la métonymie. Bern: Peter Lang.
5. Brdar, M. and R. Brdar-Szabó 2004 Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In Panther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 241-266.
6. Croft, W. 2002 The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In Dirven, R. and R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 161-205.
7. Croft, W. and D. A. Cruse 2005 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cruse, D. A. 1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Dirven, R. 2002 Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualisation. In Dirven, R. and R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 75-111.
10. Eco, U. 1973 Sémantique de la métaphore. Tel Quel 55, 25-46.
11. Esnault, G. 1925 Métaphores occidentales. Essai sur les valeurs imaginatives concrètes du Français parlé en Basse-Bretagne comparé avec les patois, parlers techniques et argots français. Paris: Les presses universitaires de France.
12. Feyaerts, K. 1999 Metonymic hierarchies. The conceptualization of stupidity in German idiomatic expressions. In Panther, K.-U. and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 309-332.
13. 2000 Refining the inheritance hypothesis: interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies. In Barcelona, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 59-78.
14. Fontanier, P. 1968 Les figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion.
15. Frisson, S. and M. J. Pickering 1999 The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25, 1366-1383.
16. Geeraerts, D. 1988 Cognitive grammar and the history of lexical semantics. In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 647-677.
17. 1997 Diachronic Prototype Semantics. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
18. Goossens, L. 1995 Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In Goossens, L. et al. (eds.), By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 159-174.
19. Jakobson, R. 2002 The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In Dirven, R. and R. Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 41-47.
20. Johnson, M. 1987 The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Reason and Imagination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21. Kövecses, Z. 2002 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Kövecses, Z. and G. Radden 1998 Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 37-77.
23. Kronasser, H. 1952 Handbuch der Semasiologie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
24. Lakoff, G. 1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
25. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson 1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Langacker, R. W. 1999 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Lapata, M. and A. Lascarides 2003 A probabilistic account of logical metonymy. Computational Linguistics 29 (2), 261-315.
28. Norrick, N. R. 1981 Semiotic Principles in Semantic Theory. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 20.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
29. Nunbert, G. D. 1978 The Pragmatics of Reference. Bloomington: The Indiana University Linguistics Club.
30. Nyrop, K. 1913 Grammaire historique de la langue française. Tome IV. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag.
31. Panther, K.-U. and L. Thornburg 1999 The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In Panther, K.-U. and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 333-357.
32. in press Metonymy. In Geeraerts, D. and H. Cuyckens (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Paul, H. 1970 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
34. Riemer, N. 2001 Remetonymizing metaphor: Hypercategories in semantic extension. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 379-401.
35. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. and J. Otal Campo 2002 Metonymy, Grammar and Communication. Granada: Editorial Comares.
36. Schmid, H.-J. 1993 Cottage und Co., idea, start vs. begin: die Kategorisierung als Grundprinzip einer differenzierten Bedeutungsbeschreibung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
37. Schofer, P. and D. Rice 1977 Metaphor, metonymy and synecdoche revis(it)ed. Semiotica 21, 121-149.
38. Seto, K. 1999 Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In Panther, K.-U. and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 91-120.
39. Sinclair, J. et al. 1995 Collins Cobuild English Dictionary. London: HarperCollins Publishers.
40. Taylor, J. R. 2002 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Tversky, B. and K. Hemenway 1984 Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 113, 169-193.
42. Ullmann, S. 1967 The Principles of Semantics. (Glasgow University Publications 84.) Oxford: Blackwell.
43. Vandeloise, C. 1986 L'espace en français. Paris: Seuil.
44. Waag, A. 1901 Bedeutungsentwicklung unseres Wortschatzes. Lahr i, B.: Moritz Schauenburg.