Generalized integration networks

Human Cognitive Processing

Volumn 24, Issue , 2009, Pages 147-160

  Fauconnier, Gilles ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190114071     PISSN: 13876724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/hcp.24.12fau     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Alac, M. 2006. How Brain Images Reveal Cognition: An Ethnographic Study of Meaning-Making in Brain Mapping Practice. PhD Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
2. Cook, A. 2006. Shakespeare, the Illusion of Depth, and the Science of Parts: An Integration of Cognitive Science and Performance Studies. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
3. Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Coulson, S. & Oakley, T. (eds). 2000. Conceptual Blending. Special Issue of Cognitive Linguistics 11 (3-4).
5. Coulson, S. & Oakley, T. (eds). 2005. Special Issue of Journal of Pragmatics 37 (10).
6. Dancygier, B. 2005. Blending and narrative viewpoint: Jonathan Raban's travels through mental spaces. Language and Literature 14 (2): 99-127.
7. Evans, V., Bergen, B. & Zinken, J. (eds). In press. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox Publishing Company.
8. Fauconnier, G. 2001. Conceptual integration and analogy. In The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak & B. N. Kokinov (eds), 255-286. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Fauconnier, G. 2003. Compressions de relations vitales dans les réseaux d'intégration conceptuelle. In Le Sens et la Mesure, J.-L. Aroui (ed.), 419-427. Paris: Honoré Champion.
10. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 1994. Conceptual projection and middle spaces. University of California, San Diego Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401. [Compressed (Unix) postscript version: 9401.ps.Z].
11. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22 (2): 133-187. [updated version in Evans, Bergen & Zinken, 2007].
12. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
13. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, R. Gibbs (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Feldman, J. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Freeman, M. 1997. Grounded spaces: Deictic-self anaphors in the poetry of Emily Dickinson. Language and Literature 6 (1): 7-28.
16. Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. & Kokinov, B. (eds). 2001. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Hiraga, M. K. 2005. Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to Analyzing Text. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Hougaard, A. & Oakley, T. (eds). In press. Mental Spaces Approaches to Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Hutchins, E. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1555-1577.
20. Imaz, M. & Benyon, D. 2007. Designing with Blends - Cognitive Foundations of Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
23. Liddell, S. 1998. Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (3): 283-314.
24. Liddell, S. K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Mandelblit, N. 1997. Grammatical Blending: Creative and Schematic Aspects in Sentence Processing and Translation. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
26. Núñez, R. 2005. Creating mathematical infinities: Metaphor, blending, and the beauty of transfinite cardinals. Journal of Pragmatics. 37: 1717-1741.
27. Oakley, T. 1998. Conceptual blending, narrative discourse, and rhetoric. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 321-360.
28. Pascual, E. 2002. Imaginary Trialogues: Conceptual Blending and Fictive Interaction in Criminal Courts. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series, 68.
29. Robert, A. 1998. Blending in the interpretation of mathematical proofs. In Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, J.-P. Koenig (ed.). Stanford: CSLI publications.
30. Sorensen, J. 1999. Essence, Schema, and Ritual Action. PhD Dissertation, University of Aarhus.
31. Sørensen, J. 2007. A Cognitive Theory of Magic. Altamira Press. (Cognitive Science of Religion Series).
32. Sweetser, E. 2000. Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics 11 (3/4): 305-333.
33. Sweetser, E. 2006. Whose rhyme is whose reason? Sound and sense in Cyrano de Bergerac. Language and Literature 15 (1): 29-54.
34. Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Williams, R. 2005. Material anchors and conceptual blends in time-telling. PhD Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.