Metonymy as a usage event

Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 147-185

  Panther, Klaus Uwe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conceptual prominence; Domain; Generic prompt; Iconic relation; Indexical relation; Meaning elaboration; Pragmatic inference

Indexed keywords

EID: 85119316972     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Barcelona, Antonio (ed.) 2000 Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. (Topics in English Linguistics 30.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Barcelona, Antonio 2002 Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: an update. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, René Dirven, and Ralf Pöhrings (eds.), 207-277. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Barcelona, Antonio 2003 The case for a metonymic basis for pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Linda L. Thornburg (eds.), 81-102. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
4. Barcelona, Antonio 2004 Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly "irregular" grammatical behavior of English paragon names. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden, and Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), 357-374. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 28.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
5. Bergman, Mats, and Sami Paavola (eds.) 2003ff. The Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms: Peirce's Terminology in His Own Words. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. [Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/science/commens/terms/index2.html. Retrieved April 23, 2006.]
6. Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław 2005 On the neural and conceptual basis of semantic relations. In Metonymy-Metaphor Collage, Elz˙bieta Górska, and Günter Radden (eds.), 11-36. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
7. Brdar, Mario, and Rita Brdar-Szabó 2003 Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Linda L. Thornburg (eds.), 241-266. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
8. Brdar-Szabó, Rita and Mario Brdar 2002 Manner-for-activity metonymy in cross-linguistic perspective. In Cognitive Linguistics Today, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, and K. Turewicz (eds.), 235-257. Frankfort am Main: Peter Lang.
9. Buchler, Justus (ed.) 1955 Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
10. Croft, William 2002 The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, René Dirven, and Ralf Pöhrings (eds.), 161-205. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Cruse, D. Alan 2000 Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Dirven, René, and Ralf Pörings (eds.) 2002 Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
13. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner 2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
14. Fillmore, Charles 1982 Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin.
15. Geeraerts, Dirk 2005 Lectal variation and empirical data in Cognitive Linguistics. In Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, and M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), 163-189. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Grady, Joseph E. 1998 The conduit metaphor revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for communication. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language 2, JeanPierre Koenig (ed.), 205-218. Stanford: CSLI.
18. Haser, Verena 2005 Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. (Topics in English Linguistics 49.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
19. Hiraga, Masako K. 1998 Metaphor-icon link in poetic texts: A cognitive approach to iconicity. The University of the Open Air 16: 95-23. [Available at: http://www.con-knet.com/~mmagnus/SSArticles/hiraga/hiraga.html. Retrieved May26, 2006]
20. Hiraga, Masako K. 2005 Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach to Analyzing Texts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Jakobson, Roman 2002 The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, Dirven, René, and Ralf Pörings (eds.), 41-47. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Kempson, Ruth M. 1975 Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lakoff, George 1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson 1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson 1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
26. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27. Langacker, Ronald W. 2000 Grammar and Conceptualization. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 14.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Leezenberg, Michiel 2001 Context of Metaphor. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Levinson, Stephen C. 2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
30. Panther, Klaus-Uwe 2005 The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, and M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), 353-386. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg 1998 A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 755-769.
32. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg 1999 The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In Metonymy in Language and Thought, Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Günter Radden (eds.), 333-357. (Human Cognitive Processing 4.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
33. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg 2001 A conceptual analysis of English -er nominals. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier, and René Dirven (eds.), 149-200. (Cognitive Linguistic Research 19.2.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg 2002 The roles of metaphor and metonymy in English -er nominals. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, René Dirven, and Ralf Pörings (eds.), 279-319. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg 2003 Introduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Linda L. Thornburg (eds.), 1-20. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113.) Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins.
36. In press Metonymy (Chapter 10). In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Paradis, Carita 2004 Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19: 245-264.
38. Radden, Günter 2002 How metonymic are metaphors? In Metaphor in Comparison and Contrast, René Dirven, and Ralf Pörings (eds.), 407-434. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
39. Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses 1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. In Metonymy in Language and Thought, Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Günter Radden (eds.), 17-59. (Human Cognitive Processing 4.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
40. Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses 2006 Towards a theory of metonymy. Ms. Hamburg University. [Revised version of Radden and Kövecses (1999)]
41. Radden, Günter, and Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.) 2004 Studies in Linguistic Motivation. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 28.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
42. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. 2000 The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, Antonio Barcelona (ed.), 109-132. (Topics in English Linguistics 30.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
43. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J., and Olga J. Díez Velasco 2002 Patterns of conceptual interaction. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, René Dirven, and Ralf Pöhrings (eds.), 489-532 (Cognitive Linguistics Research 20.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
44. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáiez, Francisco J., and José Luis Otal Campo 2002 Metonymy, Grammar, and Communication. Granada: Comares.
45. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáiez, Francisco J., and Lorena Pérez Hernández 2003 Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Linda L. Thornburg (eds.), 23-49 (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113.) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
46. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáiez, Francisco J., and M. Sandra Peia 2005 Conceptual interaction, cognitive operations, and projection spaces. In Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáiez, and M. Sandra Peia Cervel (eds.), 249-280. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
47. Wilson, Deirdre 1975 Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. London: Academic Press.