On explaining metonymy: Comment on Peirsman and Geeraerts, "metonymy as a prototypical category"

Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 317-326

  Croft, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750182162     PISSN: 09365907     EISSN: 16133641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/COG.2006.008     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Clausner, Timothy C. and William Croft 1997 The productivity and schematicity of metaphor. Cognitive Science 21, 247-282.
2. 1999 Domains and image-schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10, 1-31.
3. Croft, William 1993 The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 335-370.
4. 2002 The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In Dirven, René and Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 161-205.
5. Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse 2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Fayaerts, K. 1999 Metonymic hierarchies. The conceptualization of stupidity in German idiomatic expressions. In Panther, K.-U. and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 309-332.
7. Langacker, Ronald W. 1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8. Talmy, Leonard 1978 The relation of grammar to cognition: A synopsis. In Waltz, David (ed.), Proceedings of TINLAP-2: Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Urbana: University of Illinois Coordinated Science Laboratory, 14-24.
9. 1988 The relation of grammar to cognition. In Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165-205.
10. Taylor, J. R. 2002 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.