Informatics approaches for identifying biologic relationships in time-series data

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 60-68

  Mckinney, Brett A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS METHODS; BIOLOGIC SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL METHODS; PREDICTIVE MODELS; SINGLE MOLECULE LEVEL; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALE; TIME COURSE DATUM; TIME-SERIES DATA;

BIOINFORMATICS; GENES; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77949332439     PISSN: 19395116     EISSN: 19390041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wnan.12     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Baranzini SE, Mousavi P, Rio J, Caillier SJ, Stillman A, et al. Transcription-based prediction of response to IFNbeta using supervised computational methods. PLoS Biol 2005, 3:e2.
2. Wen X, Fuhrman S, Michaels GS, Carr DB, Smith S, et al. Large-scale temporal gene expression mapping of central nervous system development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:334-339.
3. Banerjee B, Balasubramanian S, Ananthakrishna G, Ramakrishnan TV, Shivashankar GV. Tracking operator state fluctuations in gene expression in single cells. Biophys J 2004, 86:3052-3059.
4. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 2002, 297:1183-1186.
5. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5:101-113.
6. Ramoni MF, Sebastiani P, Kohane IS. Cluster analysis of gene expression dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:9121-9126.
7. Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, Pe'er D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. Annual Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB). Tokyo: ACM Press; 2000, 127-135.
8. De Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comput Biol 2002, 9:67-103.
9. Kim SY, Imoto S, Miyano S. Inferring gene networks from time series microarray data using dynamic Bayesian networks. Brief Bioinform 2003, 4:228-235.
10. Ong IM, Glasner JD, Page D. Modelling regulatory pathways in E. coli from time series expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(suppl 1):S241-S248.
11. Smith VA, Jarvis ED, Hartemink AJ. Evaluating functional network inference using simulations of complex biological systems. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(suppl 1):S216-S224.
12. Smith VA, Jarvis ED, Hartemink AJ. Influence of network topology and data collection on network inference. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003, 11:164-175.
13. Kalman RE. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 1960, 82:35-45.
14. Perrin BE, Ralaivola L, Mazurie A, Bottani S, Mallet J, et al. Gene networks inference using dynamic Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(suppl 2):II138-II148.
15. Julier S, Uhlmann J, Durrant-Whyte HF. A new approach for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators. IEEE Trans Autom Control 2000, 45:477-482.
16. Voss HU, Timmer J, Kurths J. Nonlinear dynamical system identification from uncertain and indirect measurements. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 2004, 14:1905-1933.
17. Mckinney BA, Crowe JE, Voss HU, Crooke PS, Barney N, et al. Hybrid grammar-based approach to nonlinear dynamical system identification from biological time series. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2006, 73:021912.
18. Mckinney BA, Tian D. Grammatical immune system evolution for reverse engineering dynamic Bayesian models. Cancer Informatics 2008, 6:433-447.
19. Goodwin BC Temporal Organization in Cells. New York: Academic Press; 1963.
20. Tyson JJ, Othmer HG. The dynamics of feedback control circuits in biochemical pathways. Prog Theor Biol 1978, 5:1-62.
21. Savageau MA. Biochemical systems analysis. I. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. J Theor Biol 1969, 25:365-369.
22. Savageau MA. Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the performance of biochemical systems. Nature 1971, 229:542-544.
23. Savageau MA Biochemical Systems Analysis: a Study of Function and Design inMolecular Biology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1976.
24. Voit EO Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems: a Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
25. Voit EO, Almeida J. Decoupling dynamical systems for pathway identification from metabolic profiles. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1670-1681.
26. Kikuchi S, Tominaga D, Arita M, Takahashi K, Tomita M. Dynamic modeling of genetic networks using genetic algorithm and S-system. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:643-650.
27. Shin A, Iba H. Construction of genetic network using evolutionary algorithm and combined fitness function. Genome Inform 2003, 14:94-103.
28. Crampin EJ, Schnell S, McSharry PE. Mathematical and computational techniques to deduce complex biochemical reaction mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2004, 86:77-112.
29. Chavent G Identifiability of parameters in the output least square formulation. In: Walter E: ed. Identifiability of Parametric Models. Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon; 1987.
30. Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
31. Bevington PR, Robinson DK Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill; 1992.
32. D'haeseleer P, Liang S, Somogui R. Genetic network inference: from co-expression clustering to reverse engineering. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:707-726.
33. Veflingstad SR, Almeida J, Voit EO. Priming nonlinear searches for pathway identification. Theor Biol Med Model 2004, 1:8.
34. Kremling A, Fischer S, Gadkar K, Doyle FJ, Sauter T, et al. A benchmark for methods in reverse engineering and model discrimination: problem formulation and solutions. Genome Res 2004, 14:1773-1785.
35. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Wilson ID. The challenges of modeling mammalian biocomplexity. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:1268-1274.
36. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction: New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.
37. Hua F, Hautaniemi S, Yokoo R, Lauffenburger DA. Integrated mechanistic and data-driven modelling for multivariate analysis of signalling pathways. J R Soc Interface 2006, 3:515-526.
38. Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Gerami-Nejad M, Yanai I, McClellan M, et al. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 2005, 309:938-940.
39. VonDassow G, Meir E, Munro EM, Odell GM. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 2000, 406:188-192.
40. Kubinyi H. Drug research: myths, hype and reality. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003, 2:665-668.
41. McKinney BA, Reif DM, Rock MT, Edwards KM, Kingsmore SF, et al. Cytokine expression patterns associated with systemic adverse events following smallpox immunization. J Infect Dis 2006, 194:444-453.
42. Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 1999, 402:C47-C52.
43. Isaacs FJ, Blake WJ, Collins JJ. Molecular biology. Signal processing in single cells. Science 2005, 307:1886-1888.
44. Rosenfeld N, Young JW, Alon U, Swain PS, Elowitz MB. Gene regulation at the single-cell level. Science 2005, 307:1962-1965.
45. Kaern M, Elston TC, Blake WJ, Collins JJ. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6:451-464.
46. Kepler T, Elston TC. Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. Biophys J 2001, 81:3116-3136.
47. McAdams HH, Arkin A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:814-819.
48. Wolkenhauer O, Ullah M, Kolch W, Cho K-W.Modeling and simulation of intracellular dynamics: choosing an appropriate framework. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 2004, 3:200-207.
49. Gillespie DT. A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation. Physica A 1992, 188:404-425.
50. McAdams HH, Arkin A. It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet 1999, 15:65-69.
51. Cook DL, Gerber AN, Tapscott SJ. Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:15641-15646.
52. Kemkemer R, Schrank S, Vogel W, Gruler H, Kaufmann D. Increased noise as an effect of haploinsufficiency of the tumor-suppressor gene neurofibromatosis type 1 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:13783-13788.
53. Whitelaw NC, Whitelaw E. How lifetimes shape epigenotype within and across generations. Hum Mol Genet 2006, 15(Spec No 2):R131-R137.