Glaucoma diagnostic performance of humphrey matrix and standard automated perimetry

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 482-485

  Nam, Yoon Pyo ^a   Park, Seong Bae ^b   Kang, Sung Yong ^a   Sung, Kyung Rim ^a   Kook, Michael S ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b CHA University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Humphrey Matrix; Standard automated perimetry

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STAGING;

AREA UNDER CURVE; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LOW TENSION GLAUCOMA; MALE; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ROC CURVE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77749255354     PISSN: 00215155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-009-0717-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. H.A. Quigley G.R. Dunkelberger W.R. Green 1988 Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers Ophthalmology 95 357 363 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FhsFKltA%3D%3D 3174003
2. Brusini P, Busatto P. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma early diagnosis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1998;(227):23-24.
3. K.E. Cello J.M. Nelson-Quigg C.A. Johnson 2000 Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss Am J Ophthalmol 129 314 322 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00414-6 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c7ntVOnug%3D%3D 10704546 (Pubitemid 30126076)
4. A.J. White H. Sun W.H. Swanson, et al. 2002 An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 54 63
5. Y. Burnstein N.J. Ellish M. Magbalon, et al. 2000 Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice Am J Ophthalmol 129 328 333 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00364-5 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c7ntVOmsg%3D%3D 10704548 (Pubitemid 30126078)
6. C.A. Johnson S.J. Samuels 1997 Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38 413 425 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7pt1yrsQ%3D%3D 9040475
7. H.A. Quigley 1998 Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology Am J Ophthalmol 125 819 829 10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00046-4 1:STN:280: DyaK1czgslKmsw%3D%3D 9645719 (Pubitemid 28283743)
8. W.E. Sponsel S. Arango Y. Trigo, et al. 1998 Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry Am J Ophthalmol 125 830 836 10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00047-6 1:STN:280:DyaK1czgslKmsA%3D%3D 9645720 (Pubitemid 28286083)
9. M.F. Delgado N.T. Nguyen T.A. Cox, et al. 2002 Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmology 109 2362 2374 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01726-8 12466186 (Pubitemid 35417126)
10. P.A. Sample C.F. Bosworth E.Z. Blumenthal, et al. 2000 Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 1783 1790 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgt1ahsA%3D%3D 10845599
11. C. Bowd L.M. Zangwill C.C. Berry, et al. 2001 Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 1993 2003 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjtlKhug%3D%3D 11481263
12. J.A. Paczka D.S. Friedman H.A. Quigley, et al. 2001 Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage Am J Ophthalmol 131 188 197 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00644-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7lvFOjsA%3D%3D 11228294 (Pubitemid 32157032)
13. P.H. Artes D.M. Hutchison M.T. Nicolela, et al. 2005 Threshold and variability properties of Matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2451 2457 10.1167/iovs.05-0135 15980235 (Pubitemid 43119493)
14. N. Leeprechanon A. Giangiacomo H. Fontana, et al. 2007 Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma Am J Ophthalmol 143 263 271 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.033 17178091 (Pubitemid 46136169)
15. L. Racette F.A. Medeiros L.M. Zangwill, et al. 2008 Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 954 960 10.1167/iovs.07-0493 18326718
16. Z. Burgansky-Eliash G. Wollstein A. Patel, et al. 2007 Glaucoma detection with Matrix and standard achromatic perimetry Br J Ophthalmol 91 933 938 10.1136/bjo.2006.110437 17215267 (Pubitemid 47013108)
17. A. Patel G. Wollstein H. Ishikawa, et al. 2007 Comparison of visual field defects using Matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry Ophthalmology 114 480 487 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.009 17123623 (Pubitemid 46299100)
18. P.G. Spry H.M. Hussin J.M. Sparrow 2005 Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy Br J Ophthalmol 89 1031 1035 10.1136/bjo.2004.057778 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2MzmsF2jsQ%3D%3D 16024860 (Pubitemid 41081419)
19. P. Brusini M.L. Salvetat M. Zeppieri, et al. 2006 Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test J Glaucoma 15 77 83 10.1097/00061198-200604000-00001 16633218 (Pubitemid 43754619)
20. L. Mastropasqua P. Brusini P. Carpineto, et al. 2006 Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects J Glaucoma 15 328 335 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212230.65545.d3 16865011 (Pubitemid 44126909)
21. S. Hong H. Ahn S.J. Ha, et al. 2007 Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography Ophthalmology 114 210 215 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.021 17270671 (Pubitemid 46161808)
22. B. Bozkurt P.T. Yilmaz M. Irkec 2008 Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients J Glaucoma 17 203 210 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815a3493 18414106 (Pubitemid 351543545)
23. C.I. Clement I. Goldberg S. Graham, et al. 2009 Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma Br J Ophthalmol 93 582 588 10.1136/bjo.2007.119909 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M3pvV2msw%3D%3D 18669543
24. R.N. Weinreb C. Bowd L.M. Zangwill 2003 Glaucoma detection using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal polarization compensation Arch Ophthalmol 121 218 224 12583788 (Pubitemid 36184035)
25. R.N. Weinreb S. Shakiba L. Zangwill 1995 Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes Am J Ophthalmol 119 627 636 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ltVyltQ%3D%3D 7733188
26. Q. Zhou R.N. Weinreb 2002 Individualized compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 2221 2228 12091420
27. S. Da Pozzo P. Iacono R. Marchesan, et al. 2005 Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation and detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243 774 779 10.1007/s00417-004-1118-1 15756574 (Pubitemid 41300418)
28. D.S. Smith J. Katz H.A. Quigley, et al. 1996 Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37 1419 1428 1:STN:280:DyaK283ksFaitA%3D%3D 8641844
29. E.R. DeLong D.M. DeLong D.L. Clarke-Pearson 1988 Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach Biometrics 44 837 845 10.2307/2531595 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2Fns12ksQ%3D%3D 3203132 (Pubitemid 18243017)
30. N.J. Reus H.G. Lemij 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx VCC for glaucoma Ophthalmology 111 1860 1865 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.024 15465547 (Pubitemid 39311837)
31. F.A. Medeiros L.M. Zangwill C. Bowd, et al. 2004 Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 122 827 837 10.1001/archopht.122.6.827 15197057 (Pubitemid 38736241)