Frequency-Doubling Perimetry: Comparison With Standard Automated Perimetry to Detect Glaucoma

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Leeprechanon, Narakorn ^a   Giangiacomo, Annette ^a   Fontana, Hector ^a   Hoffman, Douglas ^a   Caprioli, Joseph ^a  

^a JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING PERIMETRY:; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDIZATION; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 33846346559     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.033     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Glovinsky Y., Quigley H.A., and Dunkelberger G.R. Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32 (1991) 484-491
2. Johnson C.A. Selective vs nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 3 (1994) S32-S44
3. Johnson C.A., and Samuels S.J. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38 (1997) 413-425
4. Maddess T., and Henry G. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vision Sci 7 (1992) 371-383
5. Anderson A.J., and Johnson C.A. Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 398-401
6. Kaplan E., and Shapley R.M. X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. J Physiol 330 (1982) 125-143
7. Osborne N.N., Wood J.P., Chidlow G., Bae J.H., Melena J., and Nash M.S. Ganglion cell death in glaucoma: what do we really know?. Br J Ophthalmol 83 (1999) 980-986
8. Morgan J.E., Uchida H., and Caprioli J. Retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 84 (2000) 303-310
9. Cello K.E., Nelson-Quigg J.M., and Johnson C.A. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 129 (2000) 314-322
10. Boden C., Pascual J., Medeiros F.A., Aihara M., Weinreb R.N., and Sample P.A. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 2433-2439
11. Fukushima A., Shirakashi M., Yaoeda K., et al. Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 13 (2004) 114-119
12. Bayer A.U., Maag K.P., and Erb C. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 1350-1361
13. Quigley H.A. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency-doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 125 (1998) 819-829
14. Trible J.R., Schultz R.O., Robinson J.C., and Rothe T.L. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 129 (2000) 740-745
15. Casson R., James B., Rubinstein A., and Ali H. Clinical comparison of frequency-doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 85 (2001) 360-362
16. Burnstein Y., Ellish N.J., Magbalon M., and Higginbotham E.J. Comparison of frequency-doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 129 (2000) 328-333
17. Serguhn S., and Spiegel D. Comparison of frequency-doubling perimetry and standard achromatic computerized perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239 (2001) 351-355
18. Patel S.C., Friedman D.S., Varadkar P., and Robin A.L. Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 129 (2000) 323-327
19. Soliman M.A., de Jong L.A., Ismaeil A.A., van den Berg T.J., and de Smet M.D. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 444-454
20. Anderson A.J., and Johnson C.A. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 16 (2003) 213-225
21. Kamantigue M.E., Joson P.J., and Chen P.P. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency-doubling technology perimetry. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 35-39
22. Kogure S., Toda Y., and Tsukahara S. Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 90 (2006) 347-352
23. Maddess T., James A.C., Goldberg I., Wine S., and Dobinson J. Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 3827-3832
24. Medeiros F.A., Sample P.A., and Weinreb R.N. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 137 (2004) 863-871
25. Johnson C.A., Cioffi G.A., and van Buskirk E.M. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 76 (1999) 571-581
26. Anderson D., and Patella V. Automated static perimetry. 2nd ed. (1992), CV Mosby, St Louis, Missouri 143-153
27. Caprioli J. Automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 111 (1991) 235-239
28. Asman P., and Heijl A. Glaucoma hemifield test. Automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 110 (1992) 812-819
29. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
30. Artes P.H., Hutchison D.M., Nicolela M.T., LeBlanc R.P., and Chauhan B.C. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 2451-2457
31. Brusini P., Salvetat M.L., Zeppieri M., and Parisi L. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 77-83
32. Spry P.G., Hussin H.M., and Sparrow J.M. Clinical evaluation of frequency-doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1031-1035
33. Artes P.H., Nicolela M.T., LeBlanc R.P., and Chauhan B.C. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total vs pattern deviation analyses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4600-4606
34. Spry P.G., Johnson C.A., McKendrick A.M., and Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 (2001) 1404-1410
35. Quigley H.A., Addicks E.M., and Green W.R. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 100 (1982) 135-146
36. Harwerth R.S., Carter-Dawson L., Shen F., Smith III E.L., and Crawford M.L. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40 (1999) 2242-2250
37. Anderson R.S., and O'Brien C. Psychophysical evidence for a selective loss of M ganglion cells in glaucoma. Vision Res 37 (1997) 1079-1083
38. Horikoshi N., Osako M., Tamura Y., Okano T., and Usui M. Comparison of detectability of visual field abnormality by frequency doubling technology in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 45 (2001) 503-509
39. Thomas R., Bhat S., Muliyil J.P., Parikh R., and George R. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 11 (2002) 46-50
40. Landers J., Goldberg I., and Graham S. A comparison of short wavelength automated perimetry with frequency doubling perimetry for the early detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 28 (2000) 248-252
41. Spry P.G., Johnson C.A., Mansberger S.L., and Cioffi G.A. Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 11-19
42. Wadood A.C., Azuara-Blanco A., Aspinall P., Taguri A., and King A.J. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 133 (2002) 327-332
43. Paczka J.A., Friedman D.S., Quigley H.A., Barron Y., and Vitale S. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol 131 (2001) 188-197
44. Cioffi G.A., Mansberger S., Spry P., Johnson C., and van Buskirk E.M. Frequency-doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 98 (2000) 195-202
45. Yamada N., Chen P.P., Mills R.P., et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 117 (1999) 1479-1484
46. Heeg G.P., Stoutenbeek R., and Jansonius N.M. Strategies for improving the diagnostic specificity of the frequency-doubling perimeter. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83 (2005) 53-56
47. Chauhan B.C., and Johnson C.A. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40 (1999) 648-656
48. Brush M.B., and Chen P.P. Learning effect among perimetric novices with screening C-20-1 frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 137 (2004) 551-552
49. White A.J., Sun H., Swanson W.H., and Lee B.B. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 3509-3590
50. Landers J.A., Goldberg I., and Graham S.L. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (2003) 1705-1710
51. Bengtsson B., Heijl A., Olsson J., and Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76 (1998) 165-169
52. Bengtsson B., and Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76 (1998) 268-272
53. Turpin A., McKendrick A.M., Johnson C.A., and Vingrys A.J. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 709-715