Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 1419-1428

  Smith, Scott D ^a   Katz, Joanne ^a,b   Quigley, Harry A ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

glaucoma; linear regression; perimetry; visual field progression

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA SURGERY; HUMAN; LASER SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRABECULOTOMY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; CHILD; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0030013973     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;1544-1549.
2. Flammer J, Drance SM, Schulzer M. Covariates of the long-term fluctuation of the differential light threshold. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:880-882.
3. Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Whelan JH, Mohondas RN. Variability of normal visual fields in a prospective study. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update. 1994/ 95. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1995:27-30.
4. Katz J, Sommer A. A longitudinal study of the age-adjusted variability of automated visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1083-1086.
5. Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M. Differential light threshold: Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984; 102:704-706.
6. Starita RJ, Piltz JR, Lynn JR, Fellman RL. Total variance of serial Octopus visual fields in glaucomatous eyes. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:85-90.
7. Heijl A, Lendgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:130-135.
8. Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:396-400.
9. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G, Patella M. Intertest threshold variability in glaucoma: Importance of censored observations and general field status. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1990/91. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1991:189-192.
10. Hoskins HD, Magee SD, Drake MV, Kidd MN. A system for the analysis of automated visual fields using the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:145-151.
11. Hoskins HD, Magee SD, Drake MV, Kidd MN. Confidence intervals for change in automated visual fields. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988;72:591-597.
12. Schulzer M, Anderson DR, Drance SM. Sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test determined by repeated observations in the absence of an external standard. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1167-1179.
13. Schulzer M. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1589-1594.
14. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Lindgren A, et al. Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields in glaucoma: Statpac 2. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1990/91. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1991:303-315.
15. Bebie H, Fankhauser F. Ein statistisches Programm zur Beurteilung von Gesichtsfeldern. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1980;177:417-422.
16. Gloor BP, Vögt BA. Long-term fluctuations versus actual field loss in glaucoma patients. Dev Ophthalmol. 1985;12:48-69.
17. Hills JF, Johnson CA. Evaluation of the t test as a method of detecting visual field changes. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:261-266.
18. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:619-623.
19. Holmin C, Krakau CET. Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases. Acta Ophthalmol. 1982;60:267-274.
20. Krakau CET. Separation of background and defect in automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol. 1984;62:210-216.
21. Schwartz B, Nagin P. Probability maps for evaluating automated visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1985;42:39-48.
22. Wu DC, Schwartz B, Nagin P. Trend analyses of automated visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987; 49:175-189.
23. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990; 31:512-520.
24. Wild JM, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Point-wise analysis of serial fields in glaucoma. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1990/91. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1991:193-199.
25. Noureddin BN, Poinoosawmy D, Fietzke FW, Hitchings RA. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991; 75:493-495.
26. O'Brien C, Schwartz B, Takamoto T, Wu DC. Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:491-500.
27. Wild JM, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Point-wise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1907-1916.
28. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Group. Advanced glaucoma intervention study: II: Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1445-1455.
29. Henson DB, Spenceley SE, Bull DR. Assessing progressive field loss in glaucoma using a self-organizing feature map. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 1994/95. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1995:3-11.
30. Birch MK, Wishart PK, O'Donnell NP. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1227-1235.
31. Asman P, Heijl A. Glaucoma hemifield test: Automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:812-819.
32. Haas A, Flammer J, Schneider U. Influence of age on the visual fields of normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:199-203.
33. Werner EB, Adelson A, Krupin T. Effect of patient experience n the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:764-767.
34. Kulze JC, Stewart WC, Sutherland SE. Factors associated with a learning effect in glaucoma patients using automated perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol. 1990;68:681-686.
35. Marchini G, Pisano F, Bertagnin F, Marraffa M, Bonomi L. Perimetric learning effect in glaucoma patients. Glaucoma. 1991;13:102-106.
36. Wild JM, Searle AET, Dengler-Harles M, O'Neill EC. Long-term follow-up of baseline learning and fatigue effects in the automated perimetry of glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 1991; 69:210-216.