Phylogenetic systematics of ipomopsis (polemoniaceae): Relationships and divergence times estimated from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences

Systematic Botany

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 181-200

  Porter, J Mark ^a   Johnson, Leigh A ^b   Wilken, Dieter ^c  

^a RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

CpDNA; Ipomopsis; Maximum likelihood; Nonparametric rate smoothing; NrITS; Polemoniaceae

Indexed keywords

DAYIA; ELAPHOCERA; ERIASTRUM; GILISENIUM; IPOMOPSIS; IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA; IPOMOPSIS DEPRESSA; IPOMOPSIS EFFUSA; IPOMOPSIS HAVARDII; IPOMOPSIS MACROSIPHON; IPOMOPSIS MINUTIFLORA; IPOMOPSIS MULTIFLORA; IPOMOPSIS PINNATA; IPOMOPSIS POLYANTHA; IPOMOPSIS POLYCLADON; IPOMOPSIS TENUIFOLIA; LANGLOISIA; LOESELIASTRUM; POLEMONIACEAE;

EID: 77749248974     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364410790862542     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. Baldwin, B.G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 3-16.
3. Baldwin, B.G., M.J. Sanderson, J.M. Porter, M.F. Wojciechowski, C.S. Campbell, and M.J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
4. Brand, A. 1907. Polemoniaceae. Pp. 1-203 in Das Pflanzenreich vol. 4: 250, ed Engler A. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
5. Campbell, D.R. and N.M. Waser. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55: 669-676.
6. Campbell, D.R., N.M. Waser, and P.G. Wolf. 1998. Pollen transfer by natural hybrids and parental species in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52: 1602-1611.
7. Campbell, D.R., N.M. Waser, and G.T. Pederson. 2002. Predicting patterns of mating and potential hybridization from pollinator behavior. American Naturalist 159: 438-450.
8. Constance, L. and R.C. Rollins. 1936. A revision of Gilia congesta and its allies. American Journal of Botany 23: 433-440.
9. Cronquist, A. 1984. Polemoniaceae. Pp. 86-155 in Intermountain flora: vascular plants of the intermountain west vol. 4 subclass Asteridae (except Asteraceae), ed. A. Cronquist, A.H. Holmgren, N.H. Holmgren, J.L. Reveal, and P.K. Holmgren. Bronx: New York Botanical Garden.
10. Day, A.G. 1980. Nomenclatural changes in Ipomopsis congesta (Polemoniaceae). Madroño 27: 111-112.
11. Day, A.G. and R. Moran. 1986. Acanthogilia, a new genus of Polemoniaceae from Baja California, Mexico. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 44: 111-126.
12. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
14. Felsenstein, J. and H. Kashino. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? a reply to Hillis and Bull. Systematic Biology 42: 193-199.
15. Freeman, E. and D. Wilken. 1987. Variation in nectar-sugar composition at the intra-plant level in Ipomopsis longiflora (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 74: 1681-1689.
16. Freeman, C.C. and R.E. Brooks. 1988. Documented plant chromosome numbers 1988: 1. Chromosome counts for North American plants-I. Sida 13: 241-250.
17. Gielly, L. and P. Taberlet. 1994. Chloroplast DNA polymorphism at the intrageneric level and plant phylogenies. Les Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences (Paris) 317: 685-692.
18. Gielly, L. and P. Taberlet. 1996. A phylogeny of the European gentians inferred from chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 120: 57-75.
19. Gielly, L., Y.-M. Yuan, P. Kupfer, and P. Taberlet. 1996. Phylogenetic use of noncoding regions in the genus Gentiana L.: chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron versus nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 460-466.
20. Goldman, N., D.R. Anderson, and A.G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 652-670.
21. Grant, V.E. 1956. A synopsis of Ipomopsis. Aliso 3: 351-362.
22. Grant, V.E. 1959. Natural history of the phlox family. Volume 1. Systematic botany. The Hague: Martinus Ninjhoff.
23. Grant, V.E. 1981. Plant speciation, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
24. Grant, V.E. 1992a. Floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingo-philous species of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89: 11828-11831.
25. Grant, V.E. 1992b. Systematics and phylogeny of the Ipomopsis aggregata group (Polemoniaceae): traditional and molecular approaches. Systematic Botany 17: 683-691.
26. Grant, V.E. 1997. Nomenclature of subfamilies and tribes in the Polemoniaceae. Phytologia 83: 385-389.
27. Grant, V.E. 1998a. Classification of the genus Gilia (Polemoniaceae). Phytologia 84: 69-86.
28. Grant, V.E. 1998b. Primary classification and phylogeny of the Polemoniaceae, with comments on molecular cladistics. American Journal of Botany 85: 741-752.
29. Grant, V.E. 2004. Taxonomy of the Polemoniaceae: Gilia and Lathrocasus Sida 21: 531-546.
30. Grant, V.E. and K. Grant. 1965. Flower pollination in the phlox family. New York: Columbia University Press.
31. Grant, V.E. and D. Wilken. 1986. Taxonomy of the Ipomopsis aggregata group (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.) 147: 359-371.
32. Grant, V.E. and D. Wilken. 1987. Secondary intergradation between Ipomopsis aggregata ssp. candida and I. a. collina (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.) 148: 372-378.
33. Grant, V.E. and D. Wilken. 1988a. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.) 149: 213-221.
34. Grant, V.E. and D. Wilken. 1988b. Racial variation in Ipomopsis tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.) 149: 443-449.
35. Gray, A. 1870. A revision of the North American Polemoniaceae. Proceedings of the Academy of Arts and Sciences 8: 247-282.
36. Gray, A. 1876. Miscellaneous botanical contributions. Proceedings of the Academy of Arts and Sciences 11: 71-105.
37. Henrickson, J. 1987. New species, combinations, and notes in Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae). Aliso 11: 589-598.
38. Hillis, D.M. and J.J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
39. Ho, S.Y., M.J. Phillips, A.J. Drummond, and A. Coope. 2005. Accuracy of rate estimation using relaxed-clock models with a critical focus on the early metazoan radiation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1355-1363.
40. Huelsenbeck, J.P.H. and F.R. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
41. Johnson, L.A. and D.E. Soltis. 1995. Phylogenetic inferencein Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
42. Johnson, L.A., J.L. Schultz, D.E. Soltis, and P.S. Soltis. 1996. Monophyly and generic relationships of Polemoniaceae based on matK sequences. American Journal of Botany 83: 1207-1224.
43. Johnson, L.A., K.H. Huish, and J.M. Porter. 2004. Seed surface sculpturing and its systematic significance in Gilia (Polemoniaceae) and segregate genera. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 153-172.
44. Johnson, L.A., L.M. Chan, T.L. Weese, L.D. Busby, and S. McMurry. 2008. Nuclear and cpDNA sequences combined provide strong inference of higher phylogenetic relationships in the phlox family (Polemoniaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48: 997-1012.
45. Juenger, T. and J. Bergelson. 2002. The spatial scale of genotype by environment interaction (GEI) for fitness in the loose-flowered gilia, Ipomopsis laxiflora (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 613-618.
46. Kearney, T.H. and R.H. Peebles. 1943. Gilia multiflora Nutt. and its nearest relatives. Madroño 7: 59-63.
47. Lepage, T., D. Bryant, H. Philippe, and N. Lartillot. 2007. A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 2669-2680.
48. Lott, T., S. Manchester, and D. Dilcher. 1998. A unique polemoniaceous plant from the middle Eocene of Utah, USA. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 104: 39-49.
49. Mau, B. and M. Newton. 1997. Phylogenetic inference for binary data on dendrograms using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 6: 122-131.
50. Mau, B., M. Newton, and B. Larget. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55: 1-12.
51. Melendez-Ackerman, E. and D.R. Campbell. 1998. Adaptive significance of flower color and inter-trait correlations in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52: 1293-1303.
52. Michaux, A. 1803. Flora Boreali-Americana. Paris: Biblopola Jouanaux Junior.
53. Michel, F. and E. Westhof. 1990. Modelling of the three-dimentional architecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative sequence analysis. Journal of Molecular Biology 216: 585-610.
54. Moran, R. 1977. New or renovated Polemoniaceae from Baja California, Mexico (Ipomopsis, Linanthus, Navarretia). Madroño 24: 141-159.
55. Nuttall, T. 1818. The genera of North American plants, and catalogue of the species, to the year 1817. Philadelphia: D. Heartt.
56. Porter, J.M. 1993. Phylogeny of Gilia sect. Giliandra (Polemoniaceae). Ph. D. dissertation. Tucson: University of Arizona.
57. Porter, J.M. 1996. Phylogeny of Polemoniaceae based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer DNA sequences. Aliso 15: 57-77.
58. Porter, J.M. and L.A. Johnson. 2000. A phylogenetic classification of Polemoniaceae. Aliso 19: 55-91.
59. Posada, D. and K.A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
60. Posada, D. and K.A. Crandall. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Systematic Biology 50: 580-601.
61. Prather, L.A., C. Ferguson, and R.K. Jansen. 2000. Polemoniaceae phylogeny and classification: implications of sequence data from the chloro-plast gene ndhF. American Journal of Botany 87: 1300-1308.
62. Pulquério, M.J.F. and R.A. Nichols. 2007. Dates from the molecular clock: how wrong can we be? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 180-184.
63. Raven, P. and D. Axelrod. 1978. Origin and relationships of the California flora. University of California Publications in Botany 72: 1-134.
64. Rambaut, A. and M. Charleston. 2001. TreeEdit: phylogenetic tree editor. .
65. Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
66. Ronquist, F. and J.P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylo-genetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
67. Ronquist, F., J.P. Huelsenbeck, and P. van der Mark. 2005. MrBayes 3.1 Manual (http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/manual.php).
68. Sanderson, M.J. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: a critique. Systematic Biology 44: 299-320.
69. Sanderson, M.J. 1997. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 1218-1231.
70. Sanderson, M.J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 101-109.
71. Sanderson, M.J. and M.F. Wojciechowski. 2000. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (Leguminosae). Systematic Biology 49: 671-685.
72. Shimodaira, H. and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of loglikelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
73. Steele, K.P. and R. Vilgalys. 1994. Phylogenetic analyses of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126-142.
74. Stuchlik, L. 1967. Pollen morphology in the Polemoniaceae. Grana Palynologica 7: 146-240.
75. *and Other Methods). Version 4b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
76. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
77. Taylor, R.L. and S. Taylor. 1977. Chromosome numbers of the vascular plants of British Columbia. Syesis 10: 125-138.
78. Thompson, J.D., D.G. Higgins, and T.J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressing multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
79. Ward, D.E. 1983a. Chromosome counts from New Mexico and southern Colorado. Phytologia 54: 302-364.
80. Ward, D.E. 1983b. In: IOPB chromosome number reports LXX. Taxon 32: 510-511.
81. Ward, D.E. 1984. Chromosome counts from New Mexico and Mexico. Phytologia 56: 55-60.
82. Ward, D.E. and R.W. Spellenberg. 1986. Chromosome counts of angio-sperms of western North America. Phytologia 61: 119-125.
83. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L.C. Higgins. 1993. A Utah Flora. Ed. 2. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.
84. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, S. Goodrich, and L.C. Higgins. 2003. A Utah Flora. Ed. 3. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.
85. Wherry, E. 1936. Miscellaneous eastern Polemoniaceae. Bartonia 18: 52-59.
86. Wherry, E. 1946. The Gilia aggregata group. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 73: 194-202.
87. White, T.J., T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315 - 322 in PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications, eds. M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, and T. White. San Diego: Academic Press.
88. Wilken, D. 1986. Chromosome number reports 93. Taxon 35: 899-900.
89. Wilken, D. 2001. A new Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) from the southwest USA and adjacent Mexico. Madroño 48: 116-122.
90. Wilken, D. and S. Allard. 1986. Intergradation among populations of the Ipomopsis aggregata complex in the Colorado Front Range. Systematic Botany 11: 1-13.
91. Wilken, D. and R. Fletcher. 1988. Ipomopsis sancti-spiritus (Polemoniaceae), a new species from northern New Mexico. Brittonia 40: 48-51.
92. Wilken, D. and R.L. Hartman. 1991. A revision of the Ipomopsis spicata complex (Polemoniaceae). Systematic Botany 16: 143-161.
93. Wolf, P.G. and P.S. Soltis. 1992. Estimates of gene flow among populations, geographic races, and species in the Ipomopsis aggregata complex. Genetics 130: 639-647.
94. Wolf, P.G., P.S. Soltis and D.E. Soltis. 1991. Genetic relationships and patterns of allozymic divergence in the Ipomopsis aggregata complex and related species (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 515-526.
95. Wolf, P.G., P.S. Soltis, and D.E. Soltis. 1993. Phylogenetic significance of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in the Ipomopsis aggregata complex and related species (Polemoniaceae). Systematic Botany 18: 652-662.
96. Wolf, P.G., R.A. Murray, and S.D. Sipes. 1997. Species-independent, geographical structuring of chloroplast DNA haplotypes in a montane herb Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae). Molecular Ecology 6: 283-291.
97. Wolf, P.G., D.R. Campbell, N.M. Waser, S.D. Sipes, T.R. Toler, and J.K. Archibald. 2001. Tests of pre- and post-pollination barriers to hybridization between sympatric species of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 213-219.
98. Wood, T.E. and T. Nakazato. 2009. Investigating species boundaries in the Giliopsis group of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae): strong discordance among molecular and morphological markers. American Journal of Botany 96: 853-861.