Investigating species boundaries in the Giliopsis group of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae): Strong discordance AMONG MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL MARKERS

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 853-861

  Wood, Troy E ^a,b,c   Nakazato, Takuya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Aflp; Giliopsis group; Introgression; Ipomopsis; Polemoniaceae; Selection; Species; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; GENE FLOW; GENEALOGY; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC ISOLATION; GENETIC MARKER; INTROGRESSION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYLOGENETICS; SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY; TAXONOMY;

IPOMOPSIS; IPOMOPSIS EFFUSA; IPOMOPSIS TENUIFOLIA; POLEMONIACEAE;

EID: 65249169264     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800153     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ARCHIBALD, J. K., D. J. CRAWFORD, A. SANTOS-GUERRA, AND M. E. MORT. 2006b. The utility of automated analysis of inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) loci for resolving relationships in the Canary Island species of Tolpis (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 1154-1162.
2. ARCHIBALD, J. K., M. E. MORT, D. J. CRAWFORD, AND A. SANTOS-GUERRA. 2006a. Evolutionary relationships within recently radiated taxa: Comments on methodology and analysis of inter-simple sequence repeat data and other hypervariable, dominant markers. Taxon 55: 747-756.
3. ARCHIBALD, J. K., A. D. WOLFE, AND S. D. JOHNSON. 2004. Hybridization and gene flow between a day- and night-flowering species of Zaluzianskya (Scrophulariaceae S.S., Tribe Manuleeae). American Journal of Botany 91: 1333-1344.
4. AVISE, J. C., AND K. WOLLENBERG. 1997. Phylogenetics and the origin of species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94: 7748-7755.
5. BARRETO, F. S., AND M. A. MCCARTNEY. 2008. Extraordinary AFLP fingerprint similarity despite strong assortative mating between reef fish color morphospecies. Evolution 62: 226-233.
6. BAUM, D. A., AND K.L. SHAW. 1995. Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In P. C. Hoch and A. C. Stephenson [eds.], Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics, 289-303. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
7. CAMPBELL, D. R. 2004. Natural selection in Ipomopsis hybrid zones: Implications for ecological speciation. New Phytologist 161: 83-90.
8. CAMPBELL, D.R., N.M. WASER, M.V. PRICE, E.A. LYNCH, AND R. J. MITCHELL. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: Pollen export and lower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45: 1458-1467.
9. CHASE, M. W., N. SALAMIN, M. WILKINSON, J. M. DUNWELL, R. P. KESANAKURTHI, N. HAIDAR, AND V. SAVOLAINEN. 2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes: Short-term and long-term goals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 360: 1889-1895.
10. COYNE, J. A., AND H. A. ORR. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
11. CRONQUIST, A. 1988. The evolution and classifcation of flowering plants. New York Botanical Garden, New York, New York, USA.
12. CURRAT, M., M. RUEDI, R. J. PETIT, AND L. EXCOFFIER. 2008. The hidden side of invasions: Massive introgression by local genes. Evolution 62: 1908-1920.
13. DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. J. Murray, London, UK.
14. DOBZHANSKY, T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
15. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees - Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany 17: 144-163.
16. FARRIS, J. S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. American Naturalist 106: 645-668.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1984. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies - Ajus-tification. Evolution 38: 16-24.
18. FORD, V. S., J. LEE, B. G. BALDWIN, AND L. D. GOTTLIEB. 2006. Species divergence and relationships in Stephanomeria (Compositae): PgiC phylogeny compared to prior biosystematic studies. American Journal of Botany 93: 480-490.
19. FUTUYMA, D. 1998. Evolutionary biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
20. GRANT, V. 1949. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angio-sperms. Evolution 3: 82-97.
21. GRANT, V. 1956. A synopsis of Ipomopsis. Aliso 3: 351-362.
22. GRANT, V. 1957. The plant species in theory and practice. In E. Mayr [ed.], The species problem. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., USA.
23. GRANT, V., AND K. GRANT. 1965. Flower pollination in the phlox family. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
24. GRANT, V., AND D. H. WILKEN. 1988. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and Ipomopsis tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette (Chicago, Ill.) 149: 213-221.
25. GRAY, A. 1876. Miscellaneous botanical contributions. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 11: 71-104.
26. GRAY, A. 1885. Contributions to the botany of North America. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 20: 257-310.
27. HENRICKSON, J. 1987. New species, combinations, and notes in Ipomopsis. Aliso 11: 589-598.
28. HEY, J. 2001. Genes, categories, and species. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
29. HUDSON, R. R., AND J. A. COYNE. 2002. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56: 1557-1565.
30. ISAAC, N. J. B., J. MALLET, AND G. M. MACE. 2004. Taxonomic inflation: Its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 464-469.
31. KIANG, Y. T., AND J. L. HAMRICK. 1978. Reproductive isolation in the Mimulus guttatus-M. nasutus complex. American Midland Naturalist 100: 269-276.
32. KIM, S. C., AND L. H. RIESEBERG. 1999. Genetic architecture of species differences in annual sunflower: Implications for adaptive trait introgression. Genetics 153: 965-977.
33. KOOPMAN, W. J. M. 2005. Phylogenetic signal in AFLP data sets. Systematic Biology 54: 197-217.
34. LAHAYE, R., M. VAN DER Bank, D. BOGARIN, J. WARNER, F. PUPULIN, G. GIGOT, O. MAURIN, ET AL. 2008. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 2923-2928.
35. LEXER, C., AND A. WIDMER. 2008. The genic view of plant speciation: Recent progress and emerging questions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 363: 3023-3036.
36. MALLET, J. 1995. A species definition for the Modern Synthesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 294-299.
37. MAYR, E. 1957. The species problem. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., USA.
38. MEUDT, H. M., AND A. C. CLARKE. 2007. Almost forgotten or latest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances. Trends in Plant Science 12: 106-117.
39. MICHENER, C. D. 1970. Diverse approaches to systematics. In T. Dobzhansky, M. K. Hecht, and W. C. Steere [eds.] Evolutionary biology, vol. 4. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, New York, USA.
40. MINDER, A. M., AND A. WIDMER. 2008. A population genomic analysis of species boundaries: Neutral processes, adaptive divergence and introgression between two hybridizing plant species. Molecular Ecology 17: 1552-1563.
41. MINNICH, R. A., AND E. FRANCO-V IZCAINO. 1998. Land of chamise and pines: historical accounts and current status of vegetation in northern Baja California. University of California Publications in Botany 80: 1-166.
42. MITCHELL, R. J., AND N. M. WASER. 1992. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: Pollination success of single flowers. Ecology 73: 633-638.
43. MORAN, R. 1977. New or renovated Polemoniaceae from Baja California, Mexico (Ipomopsis, Linanthus, Navarretia). Madroño 24: 141-159.
44. MUELLER, U., AND L. WOLFENBARGER. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 389-394.
45. O'HANLON, P. C., AND R. PEAKALL. 2000. A simple method for the detection of size homoplasy among amplified fragment length polymorphism fragments. Molecular Ecology 9: 815-816.
46. PEAKALL, R., AND P. E. SMOUSE. 2006. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
47. POLLARD, D.A., V.N. IYER, A.M. MOSES, AND M.B. EISEN. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: Evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. Public Library of Science Genetics 2: 1634-1647.
48. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. STEPHENS, AND P. J. DONNELLY. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
49. RIESEBERG, L. H., AND L. BROUILLET. 1994. Are many plant species para-phyletic? Taxon 43: 21-32.
50. RIESEBERG, L. H., T. E. WOOD, AND E. J. BAACK. 2006. The nature of plant species. Nature 440: 524-527.
51. ROKAS, A., B. L. WILLIAMS, N. KING, AND S. B. CARROLL. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
52. ROKAS, A., AND S. B. CARROLL. 2006. Bushes in the tree of life. Public Library of Science Biology 4: 1899-1904.
53. SAS Institute. 1989-2002. JMP, version 5. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
54. SCOTTI-SAINTAGNE, C., S. MARIETTE, I. PORTH, P. G. GOICOECHEA, T. BARRENECHE, K. BÓDENÈS, K. BURG, AND A. KREMER. 2004. Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Lieble.]. Genetics 168: 1615-1626.
55. STADLER, T., U. ARUNYAWAT, AND W. STEPHAN. 2008. Population genetics of speciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersion). Genetics 178: 339-350.
56. STREISFELD, M. A., AND J. R. KOHN. 2005. Contrasting patterns of floral and molecular variation across a cline in Mimulus auranticus. Evolution 59: 2548-2559.
57. * and other methods), version 40b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
58. SYSTAT SOFTWARE. 2004. Sigma Plot 9.0 for Windows. Systat Software, Point Richmond, California, USA.
59. TREMETSBERGER, K., T. F. STUESSY, G. KADLEC, E. URTUBEY, C. M. BAEZA, S. G. BECK, H. A. VALDEBENITO, ET AL. 2006. AFLP phylogeny of South American species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Systematic Botany 31: 610-626.
60. VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. VANDELEE, M. HORNES, A. FRIJTERS, ET AL. 1995. AFLP - A new technique for DNA-fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414.
61. WILKEN, D. H. 1982. A simple method for estimating anthocyanin concentrations in tissue extracts. Phytochemical Bulletin 15: 7-13.
62. YATABE, Y., N. C. KANE, C. SCOTTI- SAINTAGNE, AND L. H. RIESEBERG. 2007. Rampant gene exchange across a strong reproductive barrier between the annual sunflowers, Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris. Genetics 15: 1883-1893.