Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild

Evolution

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 669-676

  Campbell, Diane R ^a,b   Waser, Nickolas M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Genotype by environment interaction; Hybrid fitness; Hybrid zone; Ipomopsis; Tension zone; Transplant experiment

Indexed keywords

CROSS BREEDING; ENVIRONMENT; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENCE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HETEROSIS; HYBRID; HYBRID ZONE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; SEED WEIGHT; SURVIVAL; UNITED STATES;

GENOTYPE; HYBRID; HYBRID ZONE; SELECTION;

IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA; IPOMOPSIS TENUITUBA;

EID: 0034996057     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00802.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andersen, E. 1948. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2:1-9.
2. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
3. Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:67-71.
4. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1989. Adaptation, speciation, and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497-503.
5. Burke, J. M., T. J. Voss, and M. L. Arnold. 1998. Genetic interactions and natural selection in Louisiana Iris hybrids. Evolution 52:1304-1310.
6. Campbell, D. R. 1997. Genetic and environmental variation in life-history traits of a monocarpic perennial: a decade-long field experiment. Evolution 51:373-382.
7. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and E. J. Meléndez-Ackerman. 1997. Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. Am. Nat. 149:295-315.
8. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and P. G. Wolf. 1998. Pollen transfer by natural hybrids and parental species in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52:1602-1611.
9. Clausen, J., D. D. Keck, and W. M. Hiesey. 1940. Experimental studies of the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Institute Washington Publication no. 520. Washington, D.C.
10. Ellstrand, N. C., R. Whitkus, and L. H. Rieseberg. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5090-5093.
11. Emms, S. K., and M. L. Arnold. 1997. The effect of habitat on parental and hybrid fitness: transplant experiments with Louisiana irises. Evolution 51:1112-1119.
12. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
13. Galloway, L. F., and C. B. Fenster. 1999. The effect of nuclear and ctyoplasmic genes on fitness and local adaptation in an annual legume, Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 53:1734-1743.
14. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193-197.
15. Grant, V., and D. H. Wilken. 1988. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Bot. Gaz. 149:213-221.
16. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex-ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
17. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London, U.K.
18. Harrison, R. G. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56:337-349.
19. Hatfield, T., and D. Schluter. 1999. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53: 866-873.
20. Key, K. H. L. 1968. The concept of stasipatric speciation. Syst. Zool. 17:14-22.
21. Langlet, O. 1971. Two hundred years genecology. Taxon 20: 653-721.
22. Levin, D. A., and K. P. Schmidt. 1985. Dynamics of a hybrid zone in Phlox: an experimental demographic investigation. Am. J. Bot. 72:1404-1409.
23. Levy, F. 1991. A genetic analysis of reproductive barriers in Phacelia dubia. Heredity 67:331-345.
24. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
25. Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J. 1997. Patterns of color and nectar variation across an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Am. J. Bot. 84:41-47.
26. Meléndez-Ackerman, E., and D. R. Campbell. 1998. Adaptive significance of flower color and inter-trait correlations in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52:1293-1303.
27. Moore, W. S. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Q. Rev. Biol. 52:263-277.
28. Rieseberg, L. H., and S. E. Carney. 1998. Plant hybridization. New Phytol. 140:599-624.
29. Shoemaker, D. D., V. Katju, and J. Jaenike. 1999. Wolbachia and the evolution of reproductive isolation between Drosophila recens and Drosophila subquinaria. Evolution 53:1157-1164.
30. Slatkin, M. 1973. Gene flow and selection in a cline. Genetics 75: 733-756.
31. Wang, H., E. D. McArthur, S. C. Sanderson, J. H. Graham, and D. C. Freeman. 1997. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). IV. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51:95-102.
32. Waser, N. M., and M. V. Price. 1989. Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43: 1097-1109.