Subcellular dynamics of T cell immunological synapses and kinapses in lymph nodes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3675-3680

  Azar, Georges A ^a,b   Lemaître, Fabrice ^a,b   Robey, Ellen A ^c   Bousso, Philippe ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^b INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

B cells; LAT; T cell activation; Two photon imaging

Indexed keywords

HYBRID PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELL; ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; ARTICLE; CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL JUNCTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MIGRATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; KINAPSE; LYMPH NODE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; STEADY STATE; SYNAPSE;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ANIMALS; CD4-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOLOGICAL SYNAPSES; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; PHOSPHOPROTEINS;

UROPODA;

EID: 77649255627     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905901107     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Dustin ML (2008) Hunter to gatherer and back: Immunological synapses and kinapses as variations on the theme of amoeboid locomotion. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24: 577-596.
2. Billadeau DD, Nolz JC, Gomez TS (2007) Regulation of T-cell activation by the cytoskeleton. Nat Rev Immunol 7:131-143.
3. Das V, et al. (2002) Membrane-cytoskeleton interactions during the formation of the immunological synapse and subsequent T-cell activation. Immunol Rev 189:123-135.
4. Geiger B, Rosen D, Berke G (1982) Spatial relationships of microtubule-organizing centers and the contact area of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and target cells. J Cell Biol 95: 137-143.
5. Kupfer A, Dennert G (1984) Reorientation of the microtubule-organizing center and the Golgi apparatus in cloned cytotoxic lymphocytes triggered by binding to lysable target cells. J Immunol 133:2762-2766.
6. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Sciaky N, Kupfer A (1998) Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395:82-86.
7. Grakoui A, et al. (1999) The immunological synapse: A molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285:221-227.
8. Gaus K, Chklovskaia E, Fazekas de St Groth B, JessupW, Harder T (2005) Condensation of the plasma membrane at the site of T lymphocyte activation. J Cell Biol 171: 121-131.
9. Krummel MF, Sjaastad MD, Wülfing C, Davis MM (2000) Differential clustering of CD4 and CD3zeta during T cell recognition. Science 289:1349-1352.
10. Bunnell SC, et al. (2002) T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J Cell Biol 158:1263-1275.
11. Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML (2005) Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J ExpMed 202:1031-1036.
12. Yokosuka T, et al. (2005) Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol 6:1253-1262.
13. Douglass AD, Vale RD (2005) Single-molecule microscopy reveals plasma membrane microdomains created by protein-protein networks that exclude or trap signaling molecules in T cells. Cell 121:937-950.
14. Trautmann A, Valitutti S (2003) The diversity of immunological synapses. Curr Opin Immunol 15:249-254.
15. Reichardt P, et al. (2007) Naive B cells generate regulatory T cells in the presence of a mature immunologic synapse. Blood 110:1519-1529.
16. Singleton KL, et al. (2009) Spatiotemporal patterning during T cell activation is highly diverse. Sci Signal 2:ra15.
17. Brossard C, et al. (2005) Multifocal structure of the T cell - dendritic cell synapse. Eur J Immunol 35:1741-1753.
18. Hailman E, Burack WR, Shaw AS, Dustin ML, Allen PM (2002) Immature CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes form a multifocal immunological synapse with sustained tyrosine phosphorylation. Immunity 16:839-848.
19. Stoll S, Delon J, Brotz TM, Germain RN (2002) Dynamic imaging of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in lymph nodes. Science 296:1873-1876.
20. Barcia C, et al. (2006) In vivo mature immunological synapses forming SMACs mediate clearance of virally infected astrocytes from the brain. J Exp Med 203:2095-2107.
21. Reichert P, Reinhardt RL, Ingulli E, Jenkins MK (2001) Cutting edge: In vivo identification of TCR redistribution and polarized IL-2 production by naive CD4 T cells. J Immunol 166: 4278-4281.
22. McGavern DB, Christen U, Oldstone MB (2002) Molecular anatomy of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cell engagement and synapse formation in vivo. Nat Immunol 3:918-925.
23. Khanna KM, McNamara JT, Lefrançois L (2007) In situ imaging of the endogenous CD8 T cell response to infection. Science 318:116-120.
24. Miller MJ, Wei SH, Parker I, Cahalan MD (2002) Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node. Science 296:1869-1873.
25. Lin J, Miller MJ, Shaw AS (2005) The c-SMAC: Sorting it all out (or in). J Cell Biol 170: 177-182.
26. Cahalan MD, Parker I (2008) Choreography of cell motility and interaction dynamics imaged by two-photon microscopy in lymphoid organs. Annu Rev Immunol 26: 585-626.
27. Bousso P (2008) T-cell activation by dendritic cells in the lymph node: Lessons from the movies. Nat Rev Immunol 8:675-684.
28. Cahalan MD, Parker I (2005) Close encounters of the first and second kind: T-DC and T-B interactions in the lymph node. Semin Immunol 17:442-451.
29. Dustin ML (2008) T-cell activation through immunological synapses and kinapses. Immunol Rev 221:77-89.
30. Zhang W, Sloan-Lancaster J, Kitchen J, Trible RP, Samelson LE (1998) LAT: The ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase substrate that links T cell receptor to cellular activation. Cell 92:83-92.
31. ZhangW, Trible RP, Samelson LE (1998) LAT palmitoylation: Its essential role inmembrane microdomain targeting and tyrosine phosphorylation during T cell activation. Immunity 9: 239-246.
32. Shogomori H, et al. (2005) Palmitoylation and intracellular domain interactions both contribute to raft targeting of linker for activation of T cells. J Biol Chem 280:18931-18942.
33. Bonello G, et al. (2004) Dynamic recruitment of the adaptor protein LAT: LAT exists in two distinct intracellular pools and controls its own recruitment. J Cell Sci 117:1009-1016.
34. Houtman JC, et al. (2006) Oligomerization of signaling complexes by the multipoint binding of GRB2 to both LAT and SOS1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:798-805.
35. Mempel TR, Henrickson SE, Von Andrian UH (2004) T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature 427:154-159.
36. Miller MJ, Safrina O, Parker I, Cahalan MD (2004) Imaging the single cell dynamics of CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J Exp Med 200:847-856.
37. Garcia Z, et al. (2007) Competition for antigen determines the stability of T cell-dendritic cell interactions during clonal expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4553-4558.
38. Hugues S, et al. (2004) Distinct T cell dynamics in lymph nodes during the induction of tolerance and immunity. Nat Immunol 5:1235-1242.
39. Sinclair LV, et al. (2008) Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase and nutrient-sensing mTOR pathways control T lymphocyte trafficking. Nat Immunol 9:513-521.
40. Wei SH, et al. (2007) Ca2+ signals in CD4+ T cells during early contacts with antigen-bearing dendritic cells in lymph node. J Immunol 179:1586-1594.
41. Celli S, Garcia Z, Beuneu H, Bousso P (2008) Decoding the dynamics of T cell-dendritic cell interactions in vivo. Immunol Rev 221:182-187.
42. Tibaldi EV, Salgia R, Reinherz EL (2002) CD2 molecules redistribute to the uropod during T cell scanning: Implications for cellular activation and immune surveillance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7582-7587.
43. Gómez-Móuton C, et al. (2001) Segregation of leading-edge and uropod components into specific lipid rafts during T cell polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 9642-9647.
44. Friedl P, Entschladen F, Conrad C, Niggemann B, Zänker KS (1998) CD4+ T lymphocytes migrating in three-dimensional collagen lattices lack focal adhesions and utilize beta1 integrin-independent strategies for polarization, interaction with collagen fibers and locomotion. Eur J Immunol 28:2331-2343.
45. Nieto M, et al. (1997) Polarization of chemokine receptors to the leading edge during lymphocyte chemotaxis. J Exp Med 186:153-158.
46. Faroudi M, et al. (2003) Lytic versus stimulatory synapse in cytotoxic T lymphocyte/ target cell interaction: manifestation of a dual activation threshold. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:14145-14150.
47. Okada T, et al. (2005) Antigen-engaged B cells undergo chemotaxis toward the T zone and form motile conjugates with helper T cells. PLoS Biol 3:e150.
48. Gunzer M, et al. (2004) A spectrum of biophysical interaction modes between T cells and different antigen-presenting cells during priming in 3-D collagen and in vivo. Blood 104:2801-2809.
49. Qi H, Cannons JL, Klauschen F, Schwartzberg PL, Germain RN (2008) SAP-controlled T-B cell interactions underlie germinal centre formation. Nature 455:764-769.
50. Sims TN, et al. (2007) Opposing effects of PKCtheta and WASp on symmetry breaking and relocation of the immunological synapse. Cell 129:773-785.
51. Friedl P, Weigelin B (2008) Interstitial leukocyte migration and immune function. Nat Immunol 9:960-969.
52. Wang Q, et al. (2001) CD4 promotes breadth in the TCR repertoire. J Immunol 167: 4311-4320.
53. Morita S, Kojima T, Kitamura T (2000) Plat-E: An efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Ther 7:1063-1066.